PS3FanMan4Life's forum posts

Avatar image for PS3FanMan4Life
PS3FanMan4Life

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 PS3FanMan4Life
Member since 2012 • 131 Posts

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-controversial-study--conservative-politics-lead-people-racist.html

Here are some facts.

  • Children with low intelligence grow up to be prejudiced
  • Right-wing views make the less intelligent feel 'safe'
  • Analysis of more than 15,000 people


Right-wingers tend to be less intelligent than left-wingers, and people with low childhood intelligence tend to grow up to have racist and anti-gay views, says a controversial new study.

Conservative politics work almost as a 'gateway' into prejudice against others, say the Canadian academics.The paper analysed large UK studies which compared childhood intelligence with political views in adulthood across more than 15,000 people.The authors claim that people with low intelligence gravitate towards right-wing views because they make them feel safe.

Crucially, people's educational level is not what determines whether they are racist or not - it's innate intelligence, according to the academics.



tenaka2
You realize the type of people who typically conduct these studies lean left most of the time? Besides, these types of social studies typically have such a broad definition of "racism" or "homophobic" or "sexist" that it could literally include almost anyone. I have seen these studies done by political sciences and psychologists, and when you look deep you can usually find several flaws in how they measure things in order to make it biased toward what they believe. I say both far right and far left people are morons. That being said, in my life I have to say left wingers are typically the less intelligent whereas businessmen and people who are successful tend to lean right.
Avatar image for PS3FanMan4Life
PS3FanMan4Life

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 PS3FanMan4Life
Member since 2012 • 131 Posts
I thought you were going to give us info... :/lbjkurono23
I can provide you with some rumors i've been hearing about from insider sources. The PS4 should feature a 12 core Cell 2 processor. 4gb of ddr3 ram Nvidia quad core graphics processor 12 usb ports low 105w power consumption DualShock 4 w/ 12 axis and 24-bit precision, as well as a new built-in rechargeable battery able to last a full 24 hours of continuous use
Avatar image for PS3FanMan4Life
PS3FanMan4Life

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 PS3FanMan4Life
Member since 2012 • 131 Posts

yep you heard me. M$'s entertainment division (GFWL, XBL, Xbox, kinect) sales figures have dipped. meanwhile windows OS sales have increased.

http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2012/04/microsoft-posts-record-3rd-quarter-revenue-windows-resumes-growth-entertainment-back-in-the-red.ars

windows OS sales are up 4%, netbook sales, consumer and buisness sales are all up by a minimum of 2%

MS's buisness division profits are up 9%

online services (bing, etc.) are struggling to make headway rising less than 1%

servers and tools are up 14%

the entertainment division has dropped a whopping 16% with xbox sales down nearly 48%

next quarter these trends are expected to continue.

as we can see.. the xbox cow is starting to run out of milk :P

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrZAVDqW2do

ionusX
With the PS3 continually gaining market share each quarter, i'm not surprised the Xbox 360 has dipped in profits as of late. Mark my words: the PS4 will DOMINATE the next gen. Xbox 360 sales right now are a sign that people simply don't want to pay for live anymore, nor do they trust the faulty hardware. Leave it to the name brand of Sony to create high end consoles with free online.
Avatar image for PS3FanMan4Life
PS3FanMan4Life

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 PS3FanMan4Life
Member since 2012 • 131 Posts

[QUOTE="PS3FanMan4Life"][QUOTE="sandbox3d"]

Buddy, I'm not sure if you're serious, but this is one of those obvious things that doesn't really call for proof.

You bit hard into marketing hype. It happens. Move on.

sandbox3d

I'll just consider that as a victory. Me - 1 Sandbox2d - 0

lol bask in your victory champion! :D

You are victorious!

Guess that's what I get for not believing my favorite console is a super computer on the sly.

I'll just have to sit here with my nose in a pile of logic, and common gamer knowledge like a loser. :(

The PS3 is in and of itself a super console. After reading your sig, i'd be bold enough to say the PS3 could probably beat out your rig on a performance test.
Avatar image for PS3FanMan4Life
PS3FanMan4Life

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 PS3FanMan4Life
Member since 2012 • 131 Posts

[QUOTE="PS3FanMan4Life"][QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"] You're an idiot.sandbox3d

Care to disprove me?

Buddy, I'm not sure if you're serious, but this is one of those obvious things that doesn't really call for proof.

You bit hard into marketing hype. It happens. Move on.

I'll just consider that as a victory. Me - 1 Sandbox2d - 0
Avatar image for PS3FanMan4Life
PS3FanMan4Life

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 PS3FanMan4Life
Member since 2012 • 131 Posts
[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"][QUOTE="PS3FanMan4Life"][QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"] Lol okay.

From what i've read, the architecture of the Cell is years ahead of its time, and if only developers had committed more energy in the first few years, we may now be enjoying Crysis 3+ graphic levels. Oh well, it's profits over quality I guess.

You're an idiot.

Care to disprove me?
Avatar image for PS3FanMan4Life
PS3FanMan4Life

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 PS3FanMan4Life
Member since 2012 • 131 Posts
[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"][QUOTE="PS3FanMan4Life"][QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"] And you aren't even close to enjoying the latest games on high settings on consoles. What is the difference?

If lazy developers would put full effort into utilizing the Cell processor, the PS3 would be able to render graphics up to, and perhaps better than, Crysis 3

Lol okay.

From what i've read, the architecture of the Cell is years ahead of its time, and if only developers had committed more energy in the first few years, we may now be enjoying Crysis 3+ graphic levels. Oh well, it's profits over quality I guess.
Avatar image for PS3FanMan4Life
PS3FanMan4Life

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 PS3FanMan4Life
Member since 2012 • 131 Posts
[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"][QUOTE="PS3FanMan4Life"][QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"] I guess those people still playing those latest games on their 5 year old PCs, aren't really playing the latest games. They are just playing an illusion.

No, but they aren't enjoying the latest games at high settings because they haven't fed their money pit in the past few years.

And you aren't even close to enjoying the latest games on high settings on consoles. What is the difference?

If lazy developers would put full effort into utilizing the Cell processor, the PS3 would be able to render graphics up to, and perhaps better than, Crysis 3
Avatar image for PS3FanMan4Life
PS3FanMan4Life

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 PS3FanMan4Life
Member since 2012 • 131 Posts
[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"][QUOTE="PS3FanMan4Life"][QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"] Lol. $200 every other year. Okay.....whatever you say.

It's true. Between upgrading CPU, GPU, ram, motherboard, hard drive, monitor, keyboards, mouse, you're looking at an average of $200 every other year if you want to play the latest games.

I guess those people still playing those latest games on their 5 year old PCs, aren't really playing the latest games. They are just playing an illusion.

No, but they aren't enjoying the latest games at high settings because they haven't fed their money pit in the past few years.
Avatar image for PS3FanMan4Life
PS3FanMan4Life

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 PS3FanMan4Life
Member since 2012 • 131 Posts
[QUOTE="PS3FanMan4Life"][QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

PCs don't have generations, they just get upgraded.

I don't think people should compare PCs and consoles.

ShadowDeathX
I agree. PC's are out of the debate here; and even if they were, you have to spend $200 every other year to keep them running the latest games at a respectable frame rate. I say PS4 will dominate next generation for a few reasons: (1) The Cell 2 (2) reliable hardware (3) exclusives (4) Sony brand new (5) Sixaxis 2 (6) free online. Wii U will come in second, only because it appeals to the ages 4+ market, but it will not win because people will recognize it for the fad that it is. Xbox 720 will flop hard, and here is why: RROD 2. The RROD killed the Microsoft name brand, and it will kill any console they make next generation. Not to mention Live is expensive as hell now.

Lol. $200 every other year. Okay.....whatever you say.

It's true. Between upgrading CPU, GPU, ram, motherboard, hard drive, monitor, keyboards, mouse, you're looking at an average of $200 every other year if you want to play the latest games.