i havent forgot about the trophies but i care about them less then 360 achievements. also owning multiple systems doesnt mean you cant be a fanboy :P
sikanderahmed
I agree with you alot :) As for me, I care abit about trophies, less about achievements, and just a bit about Steam achievements. The annoying thing with Steam achievements is that there is no universal score (total gamerscore), each game has its indiviual score. Not that I care anyways :P
I have this awesome way of controlling games!, I just think what I want to happen, make some barely perceptible movements with my thumbs and the character I'm controlling does exactly what I want! It's like I'm controlling the game with my mind!!!!Elutheria
What about for RTS games? What about golf games? Do you really want to swing a golf bat with your thumb :P
How is that a face palm? It's the truth...Zophar87
They both fall under the same genre. I completely agree with a statement made earlier saying that one could equal Serious Sam's action with Crysis's graphics. If I have something that I find to be better as far as overall gameplay goes, and something that I feel in my opinion is a better game. I'm saying, when it comes down to games in that genre, give me gameplay over graphics any day of the week.
The OP doesn't have anything offensive that may start a flame war, but you'll get flamed anyway for not bloging it. SW rules
coreybg
There is a reason why I did not blog it. I wrote in my original message: "I remember having all those debates in the past saying that the Move is better than Wiimote, and everybody was like "You have never used a PS Move before, so you cannot tell if it is better"... well I WILL have the controller in my hand soon, so that old argument can disappear." It does have some debating elements to it. I wont debate in my blog when SW is the better place to do it
Gameplay and graphics do not cancel eachother out. You can have both at the same time (look at Crysis for example). Why not take the best of both worlds?
Give me Serious Sam over Crysis any day.
Crysis is tactical while Serious Sam is really arcade like. They are pretty different in terms of FPS and not really that comparable. A better comparison would be a tactical single player game like.... I don't even know what, compared to Crysis. Or Duke Nukem(or Doom or something) compared to Serious Sam. I would say that Painkiller has similar gameplay to Serious Sam, although the visuals and settings are very different (one game has you killing aliens in broad daylight, while the other has you killing ghosts in mysterious tombs). Funny how two games that look completely different have such similar gameplay :)
Gameplay and graphics do not cancel eachother out. You can have both at the same time (look at Crysis for example). Why not take the best of both worlds?
Zophar87
Give me Serious Sam over Crysis any day.
Neither game has "better" gameplay over the other. I played both and they gameplay is very different. Both are awesome games btw.
Either way, Serious Sam's gameplay would not be any different if it had better graphics. Tell me you wouldn't love Serious Sam with Crysis-level graphics ;)
Log in to comment