I would rather have a "True Quad Core Processor" from amd, which has no FSB, it must be good because intel is trying to copy them with the nahelem or whatever it's called, In my opinion the only reason the intel had the advantage is because of their 45nm tech advantage, which the seem to value for $1000, but for some reason when amd has the true quad core intel goes after that tech immediately, so they must some how be admitting the loss, yet pretty much all of their quad cores are more expensive then the best amd, I wonder how much the nahelem will sell for when it comes out, probably billions, and they can go sell it to dell to get the millions of dollars they need to research better technology. Every where I read reviews and articles on cpu's, they say that right now clock speeds aren't important as the used to be, and thats because AMD's obsoleition of FSB. Sure when intel catches up into that crowd, speed is going to be a big issue, but I'd rather stick with amd, because it's motherboards aren't going to be costing sky high because the demand for mother boards with no fsb, as if intels processors aren't expensive enough as it is.Mike42notO
To push you off head off its pedestal, for someone with 2 weeks xp you sure know alot! Also AMD quads make no sense, when there are better intel quads availible for cheap. You could make an argument that for cheap processors amd is better but for a quality proscessor buy intel. Also atm AMD/ATI has great grafix cards and you would be smart to buy a crossfire board like the
GIGABYTE GA-X48-DQ6 LGA 775 Intel X48 ATX Intel Motherboard - Retail
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128331
$285~~~
and intel costs more because it performs better. AMD= Toyota Prius Intel=BMW way expensive intel = Ferrari
Log in to comment