Plomdidom's forum posts

Avatar image for Plomdidom
Plomdidom

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Plomdidom
Member since 2007 • 117 Posts

What I was saying about under-18s is related to the style of the posts and my own experience. It's ironic that I'd be told to grow up.

People who criticise the game tend to have a more structured, literate and argumented approach, as opposed to the "What r u talking about, the game is great!!!!" kind of comments you'd normally get from a 14-year old. Sorry if it comes across as patronising, it's not intended to be; just a caricature. As an additional point, the younger players have naturally less references to compare the new games to.

I probably would have liked that kind of action game with flashy graphics myself when I was 15, playing games like Sonic the Hedgehog on my Sega Megadrive, but at this stage in my life (not that I'm elderly or anything) I enjoy a bit of subtlety in a video game. Which is why I only play RPGs and why I find Oblivion a tedium. And again, I'm sure that there are far better FPSs around for people who prefer that, made by people who specialise in that genre.

Avatar image for Plomdidom
Plomdidom

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Plomdidom
Member since 2007 • 117 Posts
That's an interesting point. As of today I'm actually trying some Interactive Fictions, which are text-only. A completely different experience altogether.
Avatar image for Plomdidom
Plomdidom

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Plomdidom
Member since 2007 • 117 Posts
Actually, noone has compared it to a recent game, in fact most of the comparisons are drawn, naturally enough, with its predecessor, Morrowind. And I think it's games like Oblivion, which rely mostly on graphical tricks, which get old the fastest. And no, not all games get old. Have you noticed how often the title 'Baldur's Gate 2" is mentioned as a reference for comparison? An RPG with quality writing is eternal.
Avatar image for Plomdidom
Plomdidom

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Plomdidom
Member since 2007 • 117 Posts
There's another Oblivion-flaming thread called "Oblivion bad", if you're interested, for a group therapy. I think the most infuriating thing about Oblivion is that it got brilliant marks from the likes of Gamespot (9.3, above, amongst others, Baldur's Gate 2, Planescape Torment, Fallout 2... and Morrowind).
Avatar image for Plomdidom
Plomdidom

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Plomdidom
Member since 2007 • 117 Posts

It's not really a matter of taste; I, as many other people, just like to see a bit of creativity, of which Oblivion does not show an ounce. Its an "objective" fact that you won't see many creatures, buildings or landscape types in Oblivion that you haven't seen in other games before.

Take the temples in Oblivion for instance, they're all identical replicas of a typical real-life Gothic cathedral, because they couldn't come up with an original design idea. That'sthe main difference between Morrowind and Oblivion.

Avatar image for Plomdidom
Plomdidom

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Plomdidom
Member since 2007 • 117 Posts

[QUOTE="Plomdidom"]I couldn't play it because of the loading times. On my PC (which isn't particularly bad) it takes about 2 minutes to load an exterior. For this reason alone you should definitely not buy it unless you have at least 2 GB of memory and some patience.RK-Mara

Your PC sounds really bad. Loading times are about 10 seconds for me. 2Gb is pretty much a must for any new game.

I consider that if Oblivion runs smoothly on my computer, The Witcher should as well, since it doesn't look half as good. As far as I'm concerned it's due to sloppy programming, not weak hardware.

Avatar image for Plomdidom
Plomdidom

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Plomdidom
Member since 2007 • 117 Posts
I didn't say it was a bad idea... just that Morrowind was much simpler than Daggerfall, which still didn't have any kind of excessive realism. I do think Morrowind had a good balance between complexity and accessibility. Oblivion is more like Fable, with a Walt Disney kind of world where everything is simple and easy, where you're not required to think too much and dialogues amount to yes/no questions. Whether the game is a commercial succes or not is irrelevant.
Avatar image for Plomdidom
Plomdidom

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Plomdidom
Member since 2007 • 117 Posts
Morrowind was very much dumbed down compared to Daggerfall.
Avatar image for Plomdidom
Plomdidom

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Plomdidom
Member since 2007 • 117 Posts
I wouldn't call Morrowind a true RPG (it had no decent dialogues or good NPCs either) but it was certainly better in many respects. As for Oblivion, even if not considered as a RPG, I don't see in what category it could possibly shine. If it's about walking in the grass for hours, I can do that in my garden (which is very very realistic) for free.
Avatar image for Plomdidom
Plomdidom

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Plomdidom
Member since 2007 • 117 Posts
I couldn't play it because of the loading times. On my PC (which isn't particularly bad) it takes about 2 minutes to load an exterior. For this reason alone you should definitely not buy it unless you have at least 2 GB of memory and some patience.