[QUOTE="Plzhelpmelearn"]I think I understand your definition and agree to an extent but I feel as though it is lacking in that it does not describe a person in a moral dilemma. For instance, say I am an avid Christian and believe stealing is wrong, however my family is starving and needs food. I now have an available option as well as a strong compulsion to steal a loaf of bread from the store. In this situation I have legitimate reasons to perform either action. What determines which i will choose? Do you think it is just a formula consisting of the my background/genetics that ultimately leads to the choice I will make? Or is human will capable of overriding all other factors, thus if the individual resists this compulsion he has expressed his "free will"? GabuEx
How does it not describe a person in a moral dilemma? Often a person's desires can be in conflict, and at that point in time his brain enters a state of cognitive dissonance at which point it tries to determine a way to achieve both, and this will continue either until it finds a way to do so or until it reaches a conclusion regarding which it values more, at which point in time it will discard the one valued less and work towards achieving the one it values more. Moral dilemmas are no less governed by cause and effect than everyday decisions.
And this is determined by what. Genetics and background?
Log in to comment