[QUOTE="Raijinko"][QUOTE="Nova_Mongoose"]I have those two games, SMG has good graphics but SSBB idk, SSBB has more jaggiez than SSBM, and I checked it out. So i wouldn't say SSBB, I don't count SMG because humans and real environments thats destructable and guns should be harder to do, and shows more of what the wii is capable of since it's more action packed... so please don't hate. Jaggies don't mean anything if the models are more complex (which they are) or textures are more detailed (which they are) or if the environments have more detail and more going on in the background (which they do). Brawl is far and away much better looking than Melee ever was. A simple look at the Melee levels that made it into Brawl should be proof enough. On the matter of SMG's credibility. There is quite a bit going on at once all while also rendering fully spherical worlds. It also has very strong texture work and modeling. Just because something is cute doesn't mean its less impressive than a realistic rendered game. Galaxy has quite a bit more under the hood than a corridor shooter like Red Steel. The fact that you'd consider it otherwise honestly means you don't understand how video games are made and how important a strong artistic style is. I think rendering real humans and and real environments is more difficult to make look good than rendering goombas, flower plants, and bomb enemies sorry.TC,
See SMG and SSBB for proof that you haven't played a Wii
jmangafan
Raijinko's forum posts
Log in to comment