@RevanBITW: Except being gay isn't normal. Thanks.
It's normal, except you don't like it.
@RevanBITW: Except being gay isn't normal. Thanks.
It's normal, except you don't like it.
@RevanBITW: Except being gay isn't normal. Thanks.
Sex between 2 consenting adults seems pretty normal to me.
@RevanBITW: You should keep that shit to yourself imo.
Why? See thats exactly the problem, nobody should be bothered by this, and yet here we are.
Oh you guys... where do I start...
So you have a football player coming out of the closet and you have people like yourselves calling him out for being an attention seeker. Which is the laziest opinion to have. For example, you do realize that Dan LeBatard did get call out for being an attention seeker for giving away his Baseball Hall of Fame vote right? Which you guys knows is non-sense because he was trying to make a point. So let me ask this, who the hell would want to get the kind of attention Michael Sam is getting and is going to get for the rest of his life? He's also trying to make a point, making homosexuality as normal as heterosexuality. He's putting his own well-being on the line for a just cause, that takes balls.
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/batman-arkham-origins-has-no-plans-to-fix-several-game-breaking-bugs/1100-6417619/
"The team is currently working hard on the upcoming story DLC and there currently are no plans for releasing another patch to address the issues that have been reported on the forums," a community manager said in a post on the game's official forums.
Just warning people if they haven't seen this Gamespot article today.
Warner Bros. Montreal, the developer of Batman: Arkham Origins knows there are several game breaking bugs but has said they won't fix them and still expects people to fork out for paid DLC.
I missed this third Batman game and won't be buying any future titles from them.
What an appalling attitude.
I know some people might have already read this on the front page but it'd be good if we could spread this to as many as possible and increase the awareness.
I've had very few problems with the 3rd game, wasn't really buggy for me anyway.
My friends, I was just thinking (again). if Dr Breen didn't surrender and become administrator during the 7 hour war, everyone would be dead. Humanity wouldn't exist, at all. In any form.
It was Gordon Freeman who opened the portal, thus starting the war and eventual occupation. In Halflife 2 he starts a rebellion that (if lost) would result in everyone being dead.
In the finer details, isn't this, slightly warped?
uhhhhhhhh nope
Thanks for all the kind words, friends. Super Bowl glory is sweet indeed. I live a couple hours outside of Seattle right now, but I'm thinking I might skip class and drive down for the parade tomorrow.
**** you waste. I hope you get trampled by a bunch of potheads.
I think he's trying to say he's happy for you.
I don't get why apologists becomes all egalitarian for these top QBs/Hall of Fame guys when they **** up(it's not like we give Romo a pass, and he isn't a guy going to the hall of fame). I understand when hyperbole is involved their failures need the right context, and not knee jerk reactions like "haha sucks, choker, get that scrub outta here" or whatever. But that type of lazy brain narrative works both ways "He's an all time great, how could you say he played poorly"
Peyton Manning has not played well in the playoffs, and has some noteworthy games where their loss is on something bad he did. And against Seattle he played bad. For the record you can do this type of complaining for all the big qbs. I get that there are some double standards that come with this because of recent narratives and how much the QB is talked about. For instance no one really bothers to bring up that for 9 straight years Brady really hasn't done anything in a big game(matter of fact he's played bad in their losses, and he's played bad in the AFC Title games, and at best been par in the superbowls). Or the fact that Brees has also been getting bitch slapped when he gets to the playoffs by physical defenses, and that's if he even makes the playoffs.
I get that, and by no means am I ignoring that all 3 are fantastic hall of fame guys, who belong in a top 10 all time list(well at least peyton and brady, more so brady). But at the same time it's totally fair to hold these guys to their standard. You are great. The team is built around you being great. In a big spot, play great. Peyton Manning(like the rest of the Broncos) didn't. That doesn't mean we absolve him of his share of the blame. Especially with how much more these great Qbs get paid.
As for Peyton's legacy, same as I thought before the game if he had lost. He's not the GOAT, he belongs in the top 10 all time, maybe as high as 4th or 5th. But I wouldn't call him the greatest. And to be fair even if he had won I wouldn't have called him the GOAT.
It's not being an apologist, it's pointing the fact that Peyton carried a mediocre team to the Super Bowl and lost to clearly a superior team. And on top of it they were playing in the cold, which only helped an already all-time elite secondary. The same way Tom Brady only scored 14 points against the Giants after a perfect season and at the time the most prolific offense ever, I wouldn't say he choked. Their respective teams got exposed for various team weaknesses that these great QBs usually hides pretty well. The Broncos had no running game, a beat-up O-line and defense and guess what happened, things that aren't very apparent when Peyton shreds defenses only got exposed once they faced a team that were both better and healthier. Would Montana have done much better under same circumstances? I doubt it.
Bottom line is, holy shit I was right when I said he should've signed with the 49ers. He probably would've won 2 more Super Bowls by now.
Manning's legacy is set in stone now. Post. Season. Choker.
Holy hell was that a prison raping of a game or what?
Congrats to the 206
His whole team collapsed. How is it his fault? He threw 1 bad pass all game and that was partly caused by a fumble of Moreno that set them back in 3rd and long. Dumbasses like you makes me hate football fans, just a bunch of gasbag retards who knows nothing about football but thinks they do.
Both of these assessments seem a bit harsh. Manning will always be one of the greatest of all-time and it will always have been better to made the Super Bowl and lost it than it would have been never to go at all. That being said "one bad throw"? He didn't play well all game, and definitely played wasn't an innocent bystander in that loss either.
Tom Brady vs Seahawks: 395 yards 2 TD 2 INT, Aaron Rodgers vs Seahawks: 223 yards 0 TD 0 INT, Drew Brees: 309 yards 1 TD 0 INT (but that includes that fluky long pass that should've been an interception) and Peyton Manning: 280 yards 1 TD 2 INT. And all of these offenses were held to very little scoring, this defense destroys all great QBs. It's the best secondary I've ever seen.
Log in to comment