RevanBITW's forum posts

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

You'd need to contact customer support from Runic is my best guess.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@Bigboi500 said:

@RevanBITW said:

@Bigboi500 said:

@yokofox33 said:

This game is over. It was kind of over when the Saints missed that FG.

Not kicking that FG and going for the first was stupid. Terribad stupid.

What? You do realize the kicker missed a 16 yarder earlier in the game? It was more risky for them to try the field goal at this point.

Three points could mean the difference in a low-scoring game like this. When a QB throws an interception, you don't just run the ball after that. Missing one FG is no excuse not to try for easy points when you have the opportunity.

But thats the issue, a 46 yard field goal would've been high risk low reward given the bad weather. While trying to keep the drive alive to get a TD was at least a high risk high reward situation.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@Bigboi500 said:

@yokofox33 said:

This game is over. It was kind of over when the Saints missed that FG.

Not kicking that FG and going for the first was stupid. Terribad stupid.

What? You do realize the kicker missed a 16 yarder earlier in the game? It was more risky for them to try the field goal at this point.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@Xtasy26 said:

@RevanBITW said:

@Xtasy26 said:

@560ti said:

@RevanBITW said:

@Xtasy26 said:

@C_Rule said:

Soo... A website named "FullHD1080p", ey.

This is pretty desperate fanboy material.

Hmm..exactly how?

Because all this site has is articles bragging about AMD???

Pretty much, Its not even a website . There's a three sentence paragraph about the 200 series launch, a short story about a console game (GTA 5), and an article with benchmarks stolen from another site (those three things make up the entire site).

Theres like two minutes of reading material on the entire site and non of it is original (its la small incomplete blog, NOT a website).

I don't understand how a blog with two minutes of reading material (non of which is original) warrants a thread ?

I am not argue about the lack of material in that site.

However, you have yet to disprove anything in that article that is incorrect.

The article says the 290x is the most powerful GPU in the world in reality the 780 Ti is simply more powerful. They say it only cost 550$ when in reality you can't find it for less than 600$ and they say the 780 Ti is at 700$ when yuo can actually find it for 660$. It's fanboyism at its worst.

Nowhere in the article it says the "290X is the most powerful GPU in the World". It states that the R9 290X is the "World's Most Powerful Computer Chip" in the World. It's the Award for the Most Powerful Computer Chip, hence intel was included as intel is one of the top 3 powerful computer chip makers in the world. With the Ivy Bridge Core i7 4960X being their most powerful consumer computer chip. Read the article before commenting

So the article compares processors to gpus. Thats just retarded.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

That PSU will be garbage.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@Xtasy26 said:

@560ti said:

@RevanBITW said:

@Xtasy26 said:

@C_Rule said:

Soo... A website named "FullHD1080p", ey.

This is pretty desperate fanboy material.

Hmm..exactly how?

Because all this site has is articles bragging about AMD???

Pretty much, Its not even a website . There's a three sentence paragraph about the 200 series launch, a short story about a console game (GTA 5), and an article with benchmarks stolen from another site (those three things make up the entire site).

Theres like two minutes of reading material on the entire site and non of it is original (its la small incomplete blog, NOT a website).

I don't understand how a blog with two minutes of reading material (non of which is original) warrants a thread ?

I am not argue about the lack of material in that site.

However, you have yet to disprove anything in that article that is incorrect.

The article says the 290x is the most powerful GPU in the world in reality the 780 Ti is simply more powerful. They say it only cost 550$ when in reality you can't find it for less than 600$ and they say the 780 Ti is at 700$ when yuo can actually find it for 660$. It's fanboyism at its worst.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@Mortalmaster123 said:

Well when battlefield 3 first came out, I bought a GTX 560 for it, then consistently got blue screen until I tried a 6970 that actually worked without issues. A month later I put the 560 back in to have it completely destroy my MOBO which I had to end up buying a new one. That's why I'm wondering if the 770 would actually work okay with me here.

I did indeed take it into a computer shop nearby and they were the ones who told me the 560 wasn't supported by my mobo, so they gave me the 6970 instead without having to pay extra for the price difference.

There's no way the 560 was not compatible. It was most likely the card being dysfunctional.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@Mortalmaster123 said:

I was thinking the 770 but my local store doesn't have it. I'm also worried my mobo won't support a 770 if I do buy it.

You can just order it on the internet and well your 2nd statement makes me wonder what the hell you're spending all of this money not knowing that there is no such GPU that isn't compatible with all motherboards. All you need is a PCI Express 2.0 slot.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

I'd go with a single 290 or 290x over a dual 280x. But yeah, that's definitely going to max out games for a couple of years. I just wonder about the CPU, I'm not that knowledgable about it and if it can hold up for the next few years.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@monkeytoes61 said:

@sfkm2 said:

I check the weather for tmw. I see that the Seahawks fans are ready to get soaking wet. Loyal fans. -_-'

Man, it's been shitty around here for a while. I live a couple hours north of Seattle right now, wind and rain is crazy right now.

Perfect suicide weather brah.

I lol'd