Revan_911's forum posts

Avatar image for Revan_911
Revan_911

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#1 Revan_911
Member since 2007 • 1709 Posts

[QUOTE="Revan_911"][QUOTE="tjoeb123"]

Taken from thread of the same name on the PC Games forum:

So, some people say that PC gaming is dead. I don't think that's true. What I do think is true, however, is that the company that made the platform that most PC games are played on nowadays - aka Microsoft - has abandoned its own platform. Why?

And here's a look at Microsoft abandoning PC (almost) with some of its most beloved series:

Halo - PC, Xbox (360)

Halo 2 - PC, Xbox (360)

Halo 3 - Xbox 360

Gears of War - PC, Xbox 360

Gears of War 2 - Xbox 360

GTA IV - PC, Xbox 360

GTA IV EoLC - Xbox 360

Alan Wake - Xbox 360, PC version CANCELLED (which upsets me)

Notice how as the later games in those series goes on, the PC is thrown off the bandwagon. Now, publishers like EA actually still support the PC with games like Dragon Age (BioWare), The Sims 3, Crysis, Burnout Paradise, and more. So if people like EA still supports the PC, why does Microsoft no longer support PC gaming much anymore?

Also, I was really looking forward to the PC version of Alan Wake, too....

heysharpshooter

Episodes from liberty city is coming to PC - confirmed. Alan Wake is just delayed and it is coming to PC but a bit later than the 360 version. And your logic is flawed. If i say that The Witcher or Crysis or Stalker Series or Silent Hunter series or any good RTS or point and click adventure games don't come to the consoles does that mean that console gaming is dead?

Witcher 2 and Crysis 2 are coming to consoles and Witcher 1 was coming until they decided to scrap it and focus on W2 for console. RTS games are slowly working their way onto consoles. Point and click adventure games have worked in the past on consoles.

The Witcher 2 is not coming on the consoles. RTS are crap on consoles and you know it.
Avatar image for Revan_911
Revan_911

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#2 Revan_911
Member since 2007 • 1709 Posts

Taken from thread of the same name on the PC Games forum:

So, some people say that PC gaming is dead. I don't think that's true. What I do think is true, however, is that the company that made the platform that most PC games are played on nowadays - aka Microsoft - has abandoned its own platform. Why?

And here's a look at Microsoft abandoning PC (almost) with some of its most beloved series:

Halo - PC, Xbox (360)

Halo 2 - PC, Xbox (360)

Halo 3 - Xbox 360

Gears of War - PC, Xbox 360

Gears of War 2 - Xbox 360

GTA IV - PC, Xbox 360

GTA IV EoLC - Xbox 360

Alan Wake - Xbox 360, PC version CANCELLED (which upsets me)

Notice how as the later games in those series goes on, the PC is thrown off the bandwagon. Now, publishers like EA actually still support the PC with games like Dragon Age (BioWare), The Sims 3, Crysis, Burnout Paradise, and more. So if people like EA still supports the PC, why does Microsoft no longer support PC gaming much anymore?

Also, I was really looking forward to the PC version of Alan Wake, too....

tjoeb123
Episodes from liberty city is coming to PC - confirmed. Alan Wake is just delayed and it is coming to PC but a bit later than the 360 version. And your logic is flawed. If i say that The Witcher or Crysis or Stalker Series or Silent Hunter series or any good RTS or point and click adventure games don't come to the consoles does that mean that console gaming is dead?
Avatar image for Revan_911
Revan_911

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#4 Revan_911
Member since 2007 • 1709 Posts

Sheppard punches defenceless women in the face. True!

Avatar image for Revan_911
Revan_911

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#5 Revan_911
Member since 2007 • 1709 Posts

Can we please all agree on this?

I'm not trolling or being a fanboy (that's why I wrote "and a console" and not "and on 360"), but really, some people say ME2 is a 360 exclusive, when it isn't.

PhilipV94
Cows, no matter how many of these threads you make you still won't get to play ME2, or SC:Conviction for that matter which are shaping up to be one of the years finest. Lemmings Microsoft isn't about to pass up making a PC port and making some quick cash just so you can feel better about yourself and have arguments on these forums.
Avatar image for Revan_911
Revan_911

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#7 Revan_911
Member since 2007 • 1709 Posts

[QUOTE="dreman999"]

[QUOTE="Revan_911"] Well i told you i made a topic about that and surprisingly some people agree with me. Here http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27164538Vaasman

Readed it......My god it would be a waste of time talking with you about this games plot. If you can get that the refinance "Sing" is based of different beings have different concept of communications, That they explain why specters are there and that space is not a country, that the council is not a sovereign state, that their is no way that any army can cover that much space and special people to go where an army can't go and that this is a 3 part rpg which every detail of the reapers will be explain though out the 3 games. Please read something other than star wars books.

The best part about the thread is near the end people start giving him valid explaination and reasoning, and heactually acknowledgesityet declares that they are all wrong, as only he knows what's a good and bad science fiction.

Just because someone like you is prepared to defend this game to death despite obvious weak writing, doesn't mean that I'm wrong . The best argument they've given me is fill in the gaps yourself. I had a discussion with someone about TF2 when it came out, and they had an answer for every plot hole and illogicality in the entire movie. He even said that the writers were so brilliant that they made the movie so that you can understand it only if you've seen it 3-4 times. Well if you heard him that time you might have believed him that TF2 actually makes sense. So I'm saying that just because someone is well spoken doesn't mean that he is right. I've given you valid arguments why the writing is bad, and if you don't want to hear it it's fine you know. As i said have fun playing ME2.
Avatar image for Revan_911
Revan_911

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#8 Revan_911
Member since 2007 • 1709 Posts

[QUOTE="Revan_911"][QUOTE="dreman999"] I can agree with 3 and 4. But not 1 and 2. Their was nothing about the combate that was bad outside the Mako. The aiming was number based and skill based. The story was realistic and intelligent but it was all based on how you interacted with it. Sure it was short and not filled with twist but it was great. Care to tell me what was bad about the story.

dreman999

Well i told you i made a topic about that and surprisingly some people agree with me. Here http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27164538

Readed it......My god it would be a waste of time talking with you about this games plot. If you can get that the refinance "Sing" is based of different beings have different concept of communications, That they explain why specters are there and that space is not a country, that the council is not a sovereign state, that their is no way that any army can cover that much space and special people to go where an army can't go and that this is a 3 part rpg which every detail of the reapers will be explain though out the 3 games. Please read something other than star wars books.

Now that's insulting, but you know I'm not going to argue anymore because responding to guys like you has gotten me banned for two times. So yeah i hope you enjoy the greatest achievement in writing and science fiction that is Mass Effect . Good luck on your epic journey amigo.
Avatar image for Revan_911
Revan_911

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#9 Revan_911
Member since 2007 • 1709 Posts
So you want a review for a game that is online only before the servers are up? What are they going to review the box or the loading screen? cause they won't get past that. And why even mention that you like men?illegalimigrant
Wah?
Avatar image for Revan_911
Revan_911

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#10 Revan_911
Member since 2007 • 1709 Posts

[QUOTE="Revan_911"][QUOTE="dreman999"] What did you not like about the game?(Famous last words.) And why do you feel the need to go out of your was to tell us that your friend doesn't like his pirated game?dreman999

Because this is a thread about discussion about ME2 correct? I'm just saying his impression of the game (ME2) that it has less RPG elements than GTA SA. And there are a lot of things i didn't like about the first one. 1.Bad Story see this thread http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27164538 2.Weak combat 3.Over clustered inventory system and lots of useless items. 4.Brain dead friendly A.I. Just try to play the game on some higher difficulty see what happens.

I can agree with 3 and 4. But not 1 and 2. Their was nothing about the combate that was bad outside the Mako. The aiming was number based and skill based. The story was realistic and intelligent but it was all based on how you interacted with it. Sure it was short and not filled with twist but it was great. Care to tell me what was bad about the story.

Well i told you i made a topic about that and surprisingly some people agree with me. Here http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27164538