XXXXXX

Forum Posts	Following	Followers
1709	11	5

Revan_911

Follow

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#1 Revan_911

Member since 2007 • 1709 Posts

[QUOTE="Revan_911"]
Fail....
13C

Amazing response with well thought out arguments. :roll:

TC will have a hard time coming back at this.

Well I'm sorry but this thread is hilarious.

15 years ago

Revan_911

Follow

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#3 Revan_911

Member since 2007 • 1709 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]
[QUOTE="13C"]
Pc isnt better then consoles.
13C

Yeah it definitely is based on the criteria of more games, more better games, best control system KB/M or Controller, mods, best multiplat version.

How could you say that PC isnt the best option?

thats almost all opinion. Just look at 2009 for pc compared to consoles.

What about it ?

15 years ago

Revan_911

Follow

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#4 Revan_911

Member since 2007 • 1709 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="Revan_911"][QUOTE="Birdy09"] Sorry I disagree, and for the simple reasoning of: Eye-candy in crysis? it was HD trees and rocks and sand... oh and soldier jackets. where was the eye candy? everything at is core looked amazing... but Uncharted's eye-candy came in a much more potent form.... the scenery, the movement, the things going on... every little bit of it was graphically amazing and "Wow'd" me ... i belive I only felt that in Crysis a total of .... 3 times .... the night time battle where there is lots of fight and the plane crashes close to you ... now THAT was good use of the graphics. but yea... staring at cool looking water doesnt impress me thanks.

Look I'm sorry but graphics don't measure up by how much you were wowed during gameplay.

So your just purely talking about technical limits? ok, you can say crysis wins. However back outside system wars, into reality, Uncharted 2 was a much more impressive game in its graphical style and use of its graphics.

What the hell does that even mean? Because Uncharted had train crashes, collapsing buildings, explosions and what not it had better graphics ?

15 years ago

Revan_911

Follow

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#5 Revan_911

Member since 2007 • 1709 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="Revan_911"][QUOTE="Birdy09"] Barely, and too bad it only succeeds in what ive said, textures and AI ... the beautiful thing about Uncharted 2 that every peice of it looks geourgeous despite its techinical limitations, something the majority of big PC games FAIL at these days... or always have. Developers making games on the PC are often guilty of this, relying too much on blatant use of on techinical power that they forget what makes a game WoW ... the scenes... the events that happen, all void in games like Crysis and STALKER.

Crysis has more eyecandy than UC2. And judging from your arguments i would say that Machinarium has better graphics than UC2.

Sorry I disagree, and for the simple reasoning of: Eye-candy in crysis? it was HD trees and rocks and sand... oh and soldier jackets. where was the eye candy? everything at is core looked amazing... but Uncharted's eye-candy came in a much more potent form.... the scenery, the movement, the things going on... every little bit of it was graphically amazing and "Wow'd" me ... i belive I only felt that in Crysis a total of .... 3 times .... the night time battle where there is lots of fight and the plane crashes close to you ... now THAT was good use of the graphics. but yea... staring at cool looking water doesnt impress me thanks.

Look I'm sorry but graphics don't measure up by how much you were wowed during gameplay.

15 years ago

Revan_911

Follow

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#6 Revan_911

Member since 2007 • 1709 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="Tessellation"]Totally agree TC, and i laugh at some comments here that only Crysis looks better.. both stalker games destroy UC2 in scale and graphics...let alone Arma II with photorealistic graphics huge scale (1000 A,I on screen )..i want to see uncharted 2 doing that :lol: it can barely hold 8 things on screen lol. Stalker Clear Sky image

Now im a PC gamer and all but I honestly don't find Stalker better looking than Uncharted 2. I've played both and that screen shot you posted actually doesn't look all that great. Especially out the window. I will agree with many many PC games looking better than Uncharted but honestly I don't get why so many PC gamers here put Stalker up as if it's some shining monument of beauty and awesome gameplay. Most people I play with on PC don't really think much of the game. I had some fun with it and all but I never found my self saying "oh man that looks good" which I found my self doing all the time in Uncharted 2.

UC2 is a linear game,STALKER games are OPEN WORLD with more going on screen and still look better.

Barely, and too bad it only succeeds in what ive said, textures and AI ... the beautiful thing about Uncharted 2 that every peice of it looks geourgeous despite its techinical limitations, something the majority of big PC games FAIL at these days... or always have. Developers making games on the PC are often guilty of this, relying too much on blatant use of on techinical power that they forget what makes a game WoW ... the scenes... the events that happen, all void in games like Crysis and STALKER.

Crysis has more eyecandy than UC2. And judging from your arguments i would say that Machinarium has better graphics than UC2.

15 years ago

Revan_911

Follow

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#7 Revan_911

Member since 2007 • 1709 Posts

[QUOTE="psn8214"]
[QUOTE="RadecSupreme"]
uuummmm No. Why is Stalker there? Graphics looks mediocre and look at the score it has.
Crysis and Crysis warhead is pretty much it.
RadecSupreme

Stalker with Complete 2009 looks better (at least in my eyes. I'm sure that the aesthetics of Stalker don't appeal to everyone).

Well probably with the mod it does indeed look great but when I compare graphics of games, I try to compare them with what the developer did with the game, not private mods.

Developers of Stalker didn't have 20 million dollars on their hands.

15 years ago

Revan_911

Follow

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#8 Revan_911

Member since 2007 • 1709 Posts

Here's games on top of my head.

Stalker (with 2009 mod)

Stalker Clear Sky

Crysis

Crysis Warhead

Cryostasis

Far Cry 2

Resident Evil 5

Mirrors Edge

Arma II

Batman AA

Empire Total War (If you think of the scale of the game)

Dirt 2

World in Conflict

Not to mention that with the right mods HL2 (2004) looks better than UC2. I don't get what's so special about UC2, it just looks so mundane, and people here are treating it as the greatest accomplishment in gaming. Im sure it's the best the console has to offer but i see some people comparing it to Crysis and i just laugh out loud.

Look at it this way. There are tens and tens of millions of PC gamers out there and they all know about graphics more than you do. Do you think they would spent a 1000$ for a gaming PC if something like the PS3 can have better graphics?

I know that I'm not convincing anyone most people here are major fanboys, but hey at least that's off my chest.

15 years ago

Revan_911

Follow

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0