[QUOTE="RiSkyBiZ-13"][QUOTE="The_Ish"]That's not a legitimate excuse. If it's religious, like marriage is all over the world, it has no place in the legal system.
The_Ish
Marriage isn't religion unless you choose it to be so. Athiests will go through the District Justice, while Catholics will go through the Church.
Then you have no argument when you say marriage is between a man and a woman. By the constitution, all men and women are equal before the law. Religion is not meant to be mixed with politics. So if marriage is only religious by choice, then homosexuals should be able to enjoy the same benefits the government grants to heterosexual marriages. Otherwise, this is a violaition of the constitution.
You do have a strong point, but let's face facts, the country moves slowly when it comes to acceptance. This is the first presidential race that we're seeing a woman with a possibility of making it, we're still (even in these forums) getting over racism, and so on. I see it happening within the next few generations, but not now. My only stance is that they should NEVER be allowed to partake in the sacrament of marriage, meaning through the Catholic Church.
However, adopting kids is another story. Until it is proven that you are born a homosexual, I don't think that it should be allowed. For the first 18-25 years of your life, your greatest influence is your parents. This wouldn't be fair to raise a child with homosexual tendencies in today's world simply because he got it from his parents. Maybe in a more accepting world, this would be fine, but to put a child through that kind of persecution? It would be wrong.
Log in to comment