RiSkyBiZ-13's forum posts

Avatar image for RiSkyBiZ-13
RiSkyBiZ-13

1448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 RiSkyBiZ-13
Member since 2007 • 1448 Posts

Legitamte but not a great choice....Always. Although some with depression have actually turned their life around with LSD.wemhim

And my cousin is in an insane assylum because of LSD, don't promote that crap.

Avatar image for RiSkyBiZ-13
RiSkyBiZ-13

1448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 RiSkyBiZ-13
Member since 2007 • 1448 Posts
I missed the point of this thread in my original post, my appologies. I thought the question was drugs such as heroine, cocaine, etc (since that is a common practice among the depressed). Perscription pills is legitimate, if perscribed for someone who really does have a problem. I do, however, think that we are coming up with too many excuses for ourselves these days. It seems like everyone has a problem that's perscription-worthy. Have you heard the latest: "Seasonal Bipolar Disorder." I don't believe it.
Avatar image for RiSkyBiZ-13
RiSkyBiZ-13

1448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 RiSkyBiZ-13
Member since 2007 • 1448 Posts

my viewon homosexuality. as a christian:

We believe that marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God. "People inquire about our position on those who consider themselves so-called gays and lesbians. My response is that we love them as sons and daughters of God. They may have certain inclinations which are powerful and which may be difficult to control. Most people have inclinations of one kind or another at various times. If they do not act upon these inclinations, then they can go forward as do all other members of the Church. If they violate the law of chastity and the moral standards of the Church, then they are subject to the discipline of the Church, just as others are. "We want to help these people, to strengthen them, to assist them with their problems and to help them with their difficulties. But we cannot stand idle if they indulge in immoral activity, if they try to uphold and defend and live in a so-called same-sex marriage situation. To permit such would be to make light of the very serious and sacred foundation of God-sanctioned marriage and its very purpose, the rearing of families.

Paper_Knife

Read the book of Deutoronomy in the bible, it condemns homosexuals for their practices. While I have no problem with it, as long as they keep it to themselves (I keep my sex life to myself, so should they- I'm not being bias), the Church's standpoint will remain the same, and rightfully so. Biologically speaking, human beings are here to reproduce. That's it. I view homosexuality as a slight mental disorder, I'll never say it's normal. I still do somewhat believe that they have little or no control over their urges.

We're getting off the topic of this thread here...

Avatar image for RiSkyBiZ-13
RiSkyBiZ-13

1448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 RiSkyBiZ-13
Member since 2007 • 1448 Posts
[QUOTE="RiSkyBiZ-13"]

[QUOTE="Rhythmic_"]It's so good...why does it have to be so bad for you? Someday, healthy McDonalds should be invented...healthy McDonalds that tastes the same.Vyse_Legends

You're a b******!!! I just got my wisdom teeth yanked today and all I can chow down on is this gnarly strawberry yogurt. What I would do for a quarter pounder right now..

Would you punch yourself in the face?:P

I already did. Silly Vicatin.

Avatar image for RiSkyBiZ-13
RiSkyBiZ-13

1448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 RiSkyBiZ-13
Member since 2007 • 1448 Posts

It's not necessarily a conspiracy. The government has their own agenda to push (we all do, really), and it just happens to be that the government is pushing their own Christian agenda. I mean c'mon. How can you expect me to believe the government doesn't WANT the public to believe gay people carry AIDS. If we do believe gay people carry AIDS, we'll be more likely to support the idea of gays not being able to marry or adopt children. Don't tell me you make no connection between the two. Why is it that the government pushes this idea of gay people carrying AIDS while they, at the same time, also push the idea that gays shouldn't marry or adopt children?

jalexbrown

Again, in a previous posts, I stated government as well as independant agencies not affiliated with government are also pointing toward the same thing- homosexuals are more PRONE to carry aids, it's not saying that they are all HIV positive they're simply reccomending that if you are in fact homosexual then you and your 'partner' or whatever should get tested, if the government was THAT against AIDS it would make more sense to point the statistics in the other direction. Say they homosexuals are the safest sexual partners, then they'd all die from AIDS and their "agenda" (which I don't believe, Bush is our president he is not our Government, I realize he's Christian but there are a lot more people running this country than Bush) will be reached.

Avatar image for RiSkyBiZ-13
RiSkyBiZ-13

1448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 RiSkyBiZ-13
Member since 2007 • 1448 Posts

It's so good...why does it have to be so bad for you? Someday, healthy McDonalds should be invented...healthy McDonalds that tastes the same.Rhythmic_

You're a b******!!! I just got my wisdom teeth yanked today and all I can chow down on is this gnarly strawberry yogurt. What I would do for a quarter pounder right now..

Avatar image for RiSkyBiZ-13
RiSkyBiZ-13

1448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 RiSkyBiZ-13
Member since 2007 • 1448 Posts

All I'm saying is that statistics can be twisted, and that I chose not to believe what I cannot know is true. I'm not any sort of conspiracy buff (although I'm known to dislike the government in general for lots of reasons I won't go into here). You cannot deny that numbers can be twisted. If you chose to be biased and believe that all these numbers are correct because you work for the people that make them, so be it. Your loss. I don't believe in conspiracy theories, but I'm not so closed-minded as to believe that anything is true based on numbers.

jalexbrown

That's why I earlier used that key word: Cross reference. I agree that it's possible numbers can get twisted for whatever reason or circumstance, but if you're looking at 10 different sources all reflecting the same statistics and you still refuse to believe it, then you must be thinking there is some higher foul play at work on a conspiracy level, which is simply not the case.

Avatar image for RiSkyBiZ-13
RiSkyBiZ-13

1448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 RiSkyBiZ-13
Member since 2007 • 1448 Posts

It's a tie between:

Sour Cream and Onion Ruffles equipped with A&W Root Beet

Jalapeno Doretos equipped with Mountain Dew

Avatar image for RiSkyBiZ-13
RiSkyBiZ-13

1448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#9 RiSkyBiZ-13
Member since 2007 • 1448 Posts
I'm bumping this thread (I really hope it's not against the TOS, but I have a reason) because we're getting an onslaught of new religion threads. Can we try to confine all the religious discussion to this thread, free up some room?
Avatar image for RiSkyBiZ-13
RiSkyBiZ-13

1448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 RiSkyBiZ-13
Member since 2007 • 1448 Posts

Reputable? That word made me laugh. The government doesn't have reputable sources. How old are you? I hope you're old enough to understand how unreputable the government is by its very nature.

jalexbrown

I work for the Government, and statistics are gained through seperate agencies, as well as independant agencies, and they are reputable. I don't know what logic you're using to say that all statistics are bold faced lies to mislead everyone. When they all point to the same conclusion, you simply deny it? I have no idea where you're going with this thread, it is a fact. If you will be so blind as to ignore statistics because you're some conspiracy anti-government buff, then use your imagination like I said. If you know how they engage in intercourse you'll see why they're more prone to AIDS. The health system doesn't say that they are all dirty and AIDS infested, they are simply saying that statistically more homosexuals are infected with HIV than heterosexuals, and there are several reasons for this. I can't post up the exact reasons without getting too graphic, so I'll have to leave it to you to think about it.