RiSkyBiZ-13's forum posts
[QUOTE="RiSkyBiZ-13"][QUOTE="wemhim"]Perhaps they could have been forceful, but all out war is just too much.wemhim
Forceful how? We were as politically forceful as possible, and he still refused. We were left with no choice.
I just think a CIA or Special Forces op would be better, not a war, something like a non crap version of bay of pigs for example, instead of killing someone, you identify something. And sabotage that. Of course, I don't know how these things work exactly(I'm not with the CIA or US Special Forces), but they've done operations in the past without going to war. I would just expect the government to be capable of doing what they have done in the past. Then there's the fact there's no proof they had WMDs, there was proof however, that the missles in the cuban missle crisis were actually there.In a perfect world, that would be a perfect solution. Unfortunately, in a government ran by a warlord, you can't simply assassinate the leader- another will rise in his place.
[QUOTE="RiSkyBiZ-13"][QUOTE="wemhim"]Perhaps they could have been forceful, but all out war is just too much.THETRUEDOZAH
Forceful how? We were as politically forceful as possible, and he still refused. We were left with no choice.
you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.You're right. I have no right to bring up those months of NATO talks and pleading to Sadaam to disclose and let the UN inspectors into all of his facilities. I can't even read. I won't speak out of turn again.
Perhaps they could have been forceful, but all out war is just too much.wemhim
Forceful how? We were as politically forceful as possible, and he still refused. We were left with no choice.
[QUOTE="RiSkyBiZ-13"][QUOTE="wemhim"]Let's see, because they believed something, that wasn't right. No, it's not oil, it's ignorance. It's like me declaring war on George Clooney because he shoots Indian's(Because he doesn't shoot them). They thought Hussein had WMDs, they were wrong, they made a stupid choice.THETRUEDOZAH
Sure, he didn't have them. All he would have had to do was let inspectors into the appropriate facilities and this whole ordeal could have been avoided. He had months and months to hide weapons, who said he didn't?
The UN's chief weapons inspectorYes, after months and months of meetings until he could finally inspect. A lot can be accomplished in a few months...
That's true. However, that still, in my opinion, wasn't enough to engage in war. But yes, the war is to blame on him as well. And the possibility does remain.wemhim
So we should have waited until we were attacked first? Wait until thousands, if not millions of innocent civilians are killed? Not a very good way of thinking, in my opinion. He didn't disarm, he didn't disclose, so he faced serious consequences- exactly what NATO warned for months upon months.
Let's see, because they believed something, that wasn't right. No, it's not oil, it's ignorance. It's like me declaring war on George Clooney because he shoots Indian's(Because he doesn't shoot them). They thought Hussein had WMDs, they were wrong, they made a stupid choice.wemhim
Sure, he didn't have them. All he would have had to do was let inspectors into the appropriate facilities and this whole ordeal could have been avoided. He had months and months to hide weapons, who said he didn't?
Log in to comment