Im asking because I was offered some cash (enough to get a ps3) to cut my hair, I have a 360 and wouldnt mind owning a ps3 as well. This is really a big decision for me because ive been growing my hair for about 8 years now and its very attached to me(emotionally). Not to mention my girl loves my hair as well. But its not just for a ps3 its for other reasons like job oppurtunitys as well sometimes I feel like my hair gets in the way of me getting certain jobs that I want. Taking all of what I said into factor and putting yourself in my shoes would you cut it?? Oh and so you know I have dreads and there at shoulder length.

bigboss5ak

Are you a girl? If not, then I'm assuming you're embarassed that you even posted this. $500 to cut your hair? Do you love the way you look THAT much? Wow...

Dropkick Murpheys in London

met the band

they bought us drinks

cool.

It seems like gardening is considered a feminine thing to do, but I think this is mistaken.

It is male nature to want to spread seeds, so gardening is one of the most manly things a guy can do.

What are your thoughts?

familycircusfan

^ lol

Okay, aside from my immaturity my answer is yes, men garden. Look at farmers, they're some of the toughest sob's in the world.

[QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="MarineJcksn"]MarineJcksn

Sorry, but freedom of speech and freedom of owning crazy *** guns does not = the same.

You can't compare them. One is philosophic and the other is materialistic.

You're thinking about it too close minded IMO. They're both declarations of the inherant rights each American citizen has.

The issue of the 2nd Ammendment is a topic of such hypocrisy among those who so strongly advocate the 1st Ammendment but then dismiss all of us 2 Ammendment advocates as just "Gun Nuts".

The 2nd ammendment was designed for us to form town malitias, in case our government attempted to mirror that British government that we had so recently escaped from. In modern time, the 2nd Ammendment is outdated and has been perverted to include owning as many guns as someone can lay their hands on.

In my opinion, gun nuts are generally people who have never joined the military or done a man's job in there life, and they regret it. Owning lots of guns somehow makes them feel better about themselves, somehow making them more of a "man."

[QUOTE="shyskillz"][QUOTE="Boba_Fett_3710"]

[QUOTE="RiSkyBiZ-13"]Rifles and shotguns should be fine, considering they're primarily used for hunting. I don't agree with people owning more than 1 rifle or 1 shotgun, though. I do believe handguns should be banned. They are made for one sole purpose- anti personell. They're made to kill people, nothing else. tsb247

That's a good outlook. Personally, I think if everyone knew how to fight, we wouldn't need weapons. Only weaklings use weapons.

agree, so many ppl act brave when they have one on them. take it away and they are kitty kats (just like police men). but my knuckle game is tight so i have no worries.

You're proving my point about how we should own guns by voicing that sort of observation about police.

The police? Lmao. Here we go, I knew this subject would be inevitable. Besides it being trendy to hate cops, and seeing lots of movies with corrupt cops, let's hear YOUR personal story on how you had to defend yourself from the big bad police when they tried to shoot you for no reason.

I don't understand why the U.S. doesn't just allow for shotguns and single shot rifles as the only legal use of firearms. In that case you could easily defend your home and, with maybe a trechcoat or something, out in public. But since that would drastically reduce the use of semi-automatic weapons or any type of concealed pistol, you would deal with less criminal acts with these harder to counteract weapons. Personally I think this is the best of both worlds as it provides more than adequate protection while providing much harder acess to high-risk weaponry.viralhunter

I completely agree you. Unfortunately, as you can see in this thread, the majority of us Americans are gun nuts. People freak out and start yelling gibberish about the constitution and the 2nd ammendment, while in the mean time our homicide rates continue to rise. Our country will never be safe with these idiots running the show. Oh well.

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"]In England gun controls are very strict. You can own a hunting rifle with a license, no one complains. I'm happy not to live in a country where every homeowner is so paranoid they feel the need to own round about 11 guns.tsb247

You must also keep in mind that England is much smaller than the U.S. with a MUCH higher population density. I can see how those restrictions would maker sense there, but in the U.S., what's the point? There are more people spread out over a larger area.

Who's being paranoid? I shoot for sport and for fun. It's a recreational thing I do with my friends. Sure, I could defend my home against an intruder if need be, but the liklihood of that ever being needed is very small. I own the firearms I do for mostly historical reasons. They are almost all WWII relics that I maintain and shoot because it satisfies my love for a part of history. How is that such a bad thing. Sure, I own a few more modern firearms, but how's that such a terrible thing?

Ever been to a city, or have you always been a country boy?