[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"][QUOTE="nameless12345"]

Yes, you can change views all the time.

KBFloYd

you can control the camera in 98-99% of the game... your just being a troll.

[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"][QUOTE="Renegade_Fury"]

Same thing; it's just a bad and unpolished game that missed the point of the orginal's fast and arcadey experience. It's not even nostalgia doing the talking, because I only got a hold of my copy probably around 2 years ago, and played Journey roughly at the same time.

Renegade_Fury

It has nothing to do with being on the Wii, it was just poorly designed. The controls are stiff, there's way too much emphasis on the kids outside the NiGHTS gameplay segments, and the biggest fault lies in the unskippable moments when you lose and have to go through all the filler again. The first NiGHTs was just straight gameplay, and you felt the atmosphere without a second of needless dialogue. The sequel just comes across as a rough package that didn't need to be made.

[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"][QUOTE="rilpas"] graphics don't matter, the games dorilpas

nice!, though personally, I only liked their 8 bit computers, the ST line was cheaper but it had a small library when compared to IBMs or Amigas

[QUOTE="mahlasor"]

Wow, the Atari 2600 lasted 16 years? how the... With those $hitty grafx 0_o.

rilpas

[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"][QUOTE="Renegade_Fury"]

GameCube controller, and check around the web, it's regarded as a poor game.

Renegade_Fury

Same thing; it's just a bad and unpolished game that missed the point of the orginal's fast and arcadey experience. It's not even nostalgia doing the talking, because I only got a hold of my copy probably around 2 years ago, and played Journey roughly at the same time.

[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"][QUOTE="Renegade_Fury"]

I love the original, but the sequel is atrocious.

Renegade_Fury

GameCube controller, and check around the web, it's regarded as a poor game.

Wow, the Atari 2600 lasted 16 years? how the... With those $hitty grafx 0_o.

mahlasor

[QUOTE="Vraeth"]

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

Three things...

1. Best Zelda game has been released. It's called Majora's Mask.

2. I love how you and seemingly many other people completely disregard the 2D games.

3. Wind Waker is better than Ocarina of Time. Deal with it.

turtlethetaffer

Holy ****, I'm pretty shocked someone managed to say something more ridiculous than the OP within a SINGLE post.

Care to explain how I'm wrong? Because I'm not trolling or anything.

1. MM had the best level design, overworld design, story, sdiequests, atmosphere and challenge than all the other games. The only way it was really lacking was that the soundtrack, while still amazing, wasn't as good as others.

2. There are moer 2D games than 3D games in the series. You'd be a complete moron to not at least acknowledge their existence.

3. Wind Waker looks miles better (art wise), had a better overworld with more interesting and fun things to do, better story and possibly a better soundtrack. I'd say the level design in OoT and WW are about equal with each other.

I'm not implying OoT is a bad game by any means. On the contrary, I love the game and have played it numerous times. I just happen to think it's been surpassed a few times now, in terms of quality. No game in the series is likely to beat it for being the most revolutionary, but it's already been beaten in other ways.