Shockwave-DASH's forum posts

Avatar image for Shockwave-DASH
Shockwave-DASH

1093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Shockwave-DASH
Member since 2012 • 1093 Posts

[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"][QUOTE="arkephonic"]

:lol::lol:

http://www.gamerankings.com/ps3/615426-uncharted-3-drakes-deception/articles.html

TotalPlayStation reviewed Uncharted 3 an 8/10.

IGN reviewed it a 10/10.

Gamespot reviewed it a 9.5/10.

Oh yeah, the sites with Playstation in their name are REALLY boosting the scores! I can't believe you can go on such a rant while being so wrong.

Even if a site with the name Playstation in it did give the game a 9 or a 10/10, would it really be boosting? Would it really be so far fetched or so biased? Afterall, everyone else gave it a 9/10 or a 10/10

:lol::lol:

I have seen a lot of thick headed posters, but you take the crown.

arkephonic

How about you do what I said instead of switching around in circles to mae yourself feel less humiliated? Take all the Playstation and Xbox 360 focused sites on the Uncharted 3 and Gears 3 reviews and re-average them. There's a COMPLETE DIFFERENCE. Both sides inflate scores. You ignored that because you are trying to make yourself keep whatever dignity you have left. Sorry to say, this is not how you do it, it actually makes you seem like a coward if you have to change rules all the time.

Yep, definitely the most thick headed poster of all time :lol::lol::lol:

You bring the word dense to new heights!

So basically you're not going to try and just going to continue SPAMMING nonsense? I mean now you have no valid point,, I won the argument, Arke is too scared to do what I said and prove me wrong because he or she or it knows that it will fail if he actually does what I said. So, we have resolved that GR is an unreliable source and the criteria blocks nothing.
Avatar image for Shockwave-DASH
Shockwave-DASH

1093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Shockwave-DASH
Member since 2012 • 1093 Posts

[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"][QUOTE="arkephonic"]

What about my list of favorite games would be 50% What does the 50% represent? :lol:

So wait, this entire rant and point you've been trying to prove this whole time has been based on a list of my favorite games, a list that you don't even know the contents of?

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

Wow, I have never seen such dense, thick headed posting in my life. You're literally just talking to talk.

arkephonic

It's based on the fact that if I take all the Ps3 exclusive released in the last 5 years, use you and GR for two different sources, only 50% of the games are rated high enough to be worth playing. I actually check stuff, you just laugh ad be wrong. GR already proves my theory and you know you can't post your list because then I will have to missiles to attack with.

What the ****? I don't even....

If you take me and GR for two different sources, wait, I'm a source now? LOL! Only 50% of the games are rated high enough to be worth playing?

What are you even going on about? You're making no sense whatsoever. You aren't even making it clear what you're trying to prove here.

Because your are unintelligent. Let me try putting Hyphens in between words so you can comprehend my words, -IF-YOU-TAKE-ALL-THE-NUMBER-OF -PS3_EXCLUSIVES-RELEASED-IN-TOTAL-FOR-THE-LAST-FEW-YEARS-AND-YOU-RELY-ON-GR-OR-A-SITE-LIKE-GS-THAN-YOU-TAKE-THE-HIGHEST-AVERAGED/Scoring-GAMES-FROM-BOTH-SOurces-SEPERATELY-AND-Subtract-them-FROM-THE-TOTAL-NUMBER-YOu-ONLY-HAVE-AROUND-50%
Avatar image for Shockwave-DASH
Shockwave-DASH

1093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Shockwave-DASH
Member since 2012 • 1093 Posts

[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"][QUOTE="arkephonic"]

I don't have to back anything up, you're the one that made the claims.

Go ahead and prove to me that Gamerankings is not credible, and that they allow biased sources to make up their scores. Don't just tell me they're biased, prove to me they're biased with examples and details.

arkephonic

If I see a site like XBOX world or Playstation Universe that means the site has bias reviews. You are too unintelligent to understand this, that's your problem. That alone proves it's unreliable, you have to be a real dumb person to say with a stright face that GR does not have any bias reviews at all when there are clearly sites like those on it. The fact they allow even ONE shows that they let anyone in the damn thing whether they are bias or not aslong as they meet their guide. I have to prove to you that thing like XBOX PLANET would be bias really? Ok: http://www.gamerankings.com/ps3/615426-uncharted-3-drakes-deception/articles.html Around 8-9 or so Sony Bias sites reviewed this game, taking out those would make the score NOTICABLY lower in the average. Here one for Xbox with pretty much the same amount of bias sites:http://www.gamerankings.com/xbox360/991468-gears-of-war-3/articles.html Now if you look at a game like this: http://www.gamerankings.com/xbox360/932515-culdcept-saga/articles.html That, while still having that issue, would not have its score as affected if you removed all XBOX/Playstaion focused sites. Almost every exclusive on 360, Ps3, and in the top games, Wii, all have insane numbers of XBOX/PLaystaion, heck some cases reviewing each others games, sites that have no business there and they inflate scores. If you remove all Playstation scores form Uncharted 3 and remove all XBOX scores from Gears 3 and they had the same number of reviews Gears would have had the higher percentage rate even though it is generally considered the worse games and had less rewards, but instead of putting that out there sites inflate uncharted 3's score. It doesn't work. The fact I had to tell you sites that say XBOX world or Playstation Universe are bias and you couldn't figure that out by yourself makes me worry about you.

:lol::lol:

http://www.gamerankings.com/ps3/615426-uncharted-3-drakes-deception/articles.html

TotalPlayStation reviewed Uncharted 3 an 8/10.

IGN reviewed it a 10/10.

Gamespot reviewed it a 9.5/10.

Oh yeah, the sites with Playstation in their name are REALLY boosting the scores! I can't believe you can go on such a rant while being so wrong.

Even if a site with the name Playstation in it did give the game a 9 or a 10/10, would it really be boosting? Would it really be so far fetched or so biased? Afterall, everyone else gave it a 9/10 or a 10/10

:lol::lol:

I have seen a lot of thick headed posters, but you take the crown.

How about you do what I said instead of switching around in circles to mae yourself feel less humiliated? Take all the Playstation and Xbox 360 focused sites on the Uncharted 3 and Gears 3 reviews and re-average them. There's a COMPLETE DIFFERENCE. Both sides inflate scores. You ignored that because you are trying to make yourself keep whatever dignity you have left. Sorry to say, this is not how you do it, it actually makes you seem like a coward if you have to change rules all the time.
Avatar image for Shockwave-DASH
Shockwave-DASH

1093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Shockwave-DASH
Member since 2012 • 1093 Posts

[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"][QUOTE="arkephonic"]

Just like in the other thread, YOU'RE the one making claims here, not me.

Go ahead and prove to me that 50% of PS3 exclusives aren't deserving of their scores.

I'm fully convinced that you just talk out of your ass and spout misinformation all day.

Don't respond unless you actually back up your claims with some proof, just like you refuse to do in the other thread.

You're all talk no substance.

arkephonic

No you are, I told you to list the games you liked the most within the last few years because I claimed it would be around 50% and you would ignore the others. You know that's true, and that's why you haven't listed any games yet, because you know if you do I can crush your terrible logic. All you have to do is make a list, type some words, no that hard you did it in this post.

What about my list of favorite games would be 50% What does the 50% represent? :lol:

So wait, this entire rant and point you've been trying to prove this whole time has been based on a list of my favorite games, a list that you don't even know the contents of?

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

Wow, I have never seen such dense, thick headed posting in my life. You're literally just talking to talk.

It's based on the fact that if I take all the Ps3 exclusive released in the last 5 years, use you and GR for two different sources, only 50% of the games are rated high enough to be worth playing. I actually check stuff, you just laugh ad be wrong. GR already proves my theory and you know you can't post your list because then I will have to missiles to attack with.
Avatar image for Shockwave-DASH
Shockwave-DASH

1093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Shockwave-DASH
Member since 2012 • 1093 Posts
Nintendo Paradise Island, because it has better games in each genre than other systems presents Enclaved: Shadows of Twilight, fall 2012. "It is going for a mix of Heavy Rain and Uncharted like approachesThe combat uses a Action, but replaces shooting with a more action-strategy-rpg system that is very unique. Also, as close to HD as you can get on the Wii, spanning 2 discs in large continents that the system just barely loads as the worlds in this game are massive." "The combat is like the Witcher to meets Uncharted, Meets Disgea. With many gameplay options only capable on the Wii in a game so large, and full of animated trees and people who have different reactions based on what you do, that there is not a game on any competition, whether it be fro the HD twins or PC, that is this big, but there is a VERY helpful map implemented that on the Wii could be used with. It really is very accurate." "Over 120 hours of Gameplay, more hours based on whether you do the "Character quests" where you play through other characters stories which can take up to full game length. The plot and these side stories are well though out, and they blend together like a book." "The best graphic on the Wii this generation, and in some cases better than some earlier HD games with smooth frame rate, lighting that not one games has been able to acheived with water, fire, and rain physics that just show that this game maxed out the system and this cinematic Action-Adventure will give Uncharted or Heavy Rain owners a run for their money." Link: http://www.google.com/search?q=enclave+wii&hl=en&prmd=imvns&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=svq6T8bWL5HQgAeRntXCCg&ved=0CFkQsAQ&biw=1680&bih=829 Pics:
Avatar image for Shockwave-DASH
Shockwave-DASH

1093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Shockwave-DASH
Member since 2012 • 1093 Posts
[QUOTE="LP4EVA2005"]

[QUOTE="Dudersaper"]Mineral Town has NO time limit :PDudersaper

i know but i dont own a GBA/NDS. i wanted to get the PS1/PS2 game(s) but you guys are saying there is time limit in those. :(

I'm actually not sure if the PS1/PS2 ones really have time limit, even if they have a story ending if should let you continue to grow your farm and interact with the townspeople just like in the GBA versions. I have Mineral Town for the GBA played literally hundres and hundreds of hours (probably my second game with most hours, first being DQVIII) , but I still haven't gotten in the mood to play WL, but I'm quite sure it should have post-story/infinite gameplay also.

Would you say it's one of your favorite games?
Avatar image for Shockwave-DASH
Shockwave-DASH

1093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Shockwave-DASH
Member since 2012 • 1093 Posts

[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"][QUOTE="arkephonic"]

:lol:

You say that 50% of the PS3 exclusives are not deserving of their scores, and then you question me for calling you an idiot?

Idiot is the best way to descirbe you and your statements, there's nothing to argue.

:lol:

arkephonic

Yes because what basis do you have to call me an idiot when you put no info on the table to go against it? Doesn't make sense, can you at least try to make sense? I think you're doing this on purpose.

Just like in the other thread, YOU'RE the one making claims here, not me.

Go ahead and prove to me that 50% of PS3 exclusives aren't deserving of their scores.

I'm fully convinced that you just talk out of your ass and spout misinformation all day.

Don't respond unless you actually back up your claims with some proof, just like you refuse to do in the other thread.

You're all talk no substance.

No you are, I told you to list the games you liked the most within the last few years because I claimed it would be around 50% and you would ignore the others. You know that's true, and that's why you haven't listed any games yet, because you know if you do I can crush your terrible logic. All you have to do is make a list, type some words, no that hard you did it in this post.
Avatar image for Shockwave-DASH
Shockwave-DASH

1093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Shockwave-DASH
Member since 2012 • 1093 Posts

[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"][QUOTE="arkephonic"]

You obviously have no idea how Gamerankings actually works. You never see that kind of disparity in the reviews, they have a criteria.

Just a bit of advice, try talking about things you know something about, which based on your short track record, looks like nothing so far.

arkephonic

Why do you say people are wrong and say they have a criteria for something when you never actually checked to see if they allow bias sites on. I tell you what, if I find one PS3 game with more than 2 reviews by either a Xbox bias site or/and a ps3 bias site, the mods get to ban you ok? Because you never actually check you just shout nonsense about a site you like but never realized the flaws so you can;t handle it. Why can;t you at least back up what you're saying if you are just going to call out people wrong? Did i hur your feelings?

I don't have to back anything up, you're the one that made the claims.

Go ahead and prove to me that Gamerankings is not credible, and that they allow biased sources to make up their scores. Don't just tell me they're biased, prove to me they're biased with examples and details.

If I see a site like XBOX world or Playstation Universe that means the site has bias reviews. You are too unintelligent to understand this, that's your problem. That alone proves it's unreliable, you have to be a real dumb person to say with a stright face that GR does not have any bias reviews at all when there are clearly sites like those on it. The fact they allow even ONE shows that they let anyone in the damn thing whether they are bias or not aslong as they meet their guide. I have to prove to you that thing like XBOX PLANET would be bias really? Ok: http://www.gamerankings.com/ps3/615426-uncharted-3-drakes-deception/articles.html Around 8-9 or so Sony Bias sites reviewed this game, taking out those would make the score NOTICABLY lower in the average. Here one for Xbox with pretty much the same amount of bias sites:http://www.gamerankings.com/xbox360/991468-gears-of-war-3/articles.html Now if you look at a game like this: http://www.gamerankings.com/xbox360/932515-culdcept-saga/articles.html That, while still having that issue, would not have its score as affected if you removed all XBOX/Playstaion focused sites. Almost every exclusive on 360, Ps3, and in the top games, Wii, all have insane numbers of XBOX/PLaystaion, heck some cases reviewing each others games, sites that have no business there and they inflate scores. If you remove all Playstation scores form Uncharted 3 and remove all XBOX scores from Gears 3 and they had the same number of reviews Gears would have had the higher percentage rate even though it is generally considered the worse games and had less rewards, but instead of putting that out there sites inflate uncharted 3's score. It doesn't work. The fact I had to tell you sites that say XBOX world or Playstation Universe are bias and you couldn't figure that out by yourself makes me worry about you.
Avatar image for Shockwave-DASH
Shockwave-DASH

1093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Shockwave-DASH
Member since 2012 • 1093 Posts

[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"][QUOTE="arkephonic"]

I actually feel like an idiot for responding to you, it's like challenging a special ed student to an arm wrestling match.

arkephonic

How can you claim I am wrong when you have no info against what I said to prove it wrong? I guess special ed doesn't teach common sense they just lock you in those padded rooms. How's it feel? Are you actually going to try to put effort now or did I just make you cry and run off and not come back to this conversation because you can handle to much being proven wrong in such large amounts?

:lol:

You say that 50% of the PS3 exclusives are not deserving of their scores, and then you question me for calling you an idiot?

Idiot is the best way to descirbe you and your statements, there's nothing to argue.

:lol:

Yes because what basis do you have to call me an idiot when you put no info on the table to go against it? Doesn't make sense, can you at least try to make sense? I think you're doing this on purpose.
Avatar image for Shockwave-DASH
Shockwave-DASH

1093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Shockwave-DASH
Member since 2012 • 1093 Posts

[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"][QUOTE="arkephonic"]

1 review site does little to change anything. 1 review out of 80 cannot massively change the score. Going by just 1 review is when you're susceptible to bias. I don't expect you to comprehend this, because I've seen you going on about different topics in 3 different threads and it seems like your goal in life is to be as wrong as possible :lol:

We gotta think of a nickname for you, Mr. Wrong will suffice for now.

arkephonic

I am wrong because you have to reduce your example to one. If a bunch of guys give a game 8.5's and 10 give them 2.0's that causes the average to change quite a bit. Also I have only been in 2 threads you have posted in so I guess you're Mr.Wrong, but I prefer to call you wongtong.

You obviously have no idea how Gamerankings actually works. You never see that kind of disparity in the reviews, they have a criteria.

Just a bit of advice, try talking about things you know something about, which based on your short track record, looks like nothing so far.

Why do you say people are wrong and say they have a criteria for something when you never actually checked to see if they allow bias sites on. I tell you what, if I find one PS3 game with more than 2 reviews by either a Xbox bias site or/and a ps3 bias site, the mods get to ban you ok? Because you never actually check you just shout nonsense about a site you like but never realized the flaws so you can;t handle it. Why can;t you at least back up what you're saying if you are just going to call out people wrong? Did i hur your feelings?