[QUOTE="GsSanAndreas"][QUOTE="medi_pack"]Defintely not. PS3 is failing because of price, hardware problems, which would not be better if it were released earlier before the 360. It would been a lot worse. medi_pack
Lmao hardware problems? about 3% of ps3's have had problems and the worst problem is freezing. Definitely the major selling point of the PS3 is it's "omg gud grafix lol". I must compare it to the 360, yet again. The PS3's processor (Cell) is an amazing little piece of technology. It in many ways is better than the processor of the 360 (Xenon). As for the GPU of the PS3 (RSX) it's a different story entirely. The 360's GPU (Xenos) is far superior than RSX. And, the 360 has more Net Memory Bandwidth. This said, each console is well... about exactly the same in terms of power. In the end, the hardware should not be a deciding factor, the games should. Time and time again this doesn't seem to matter to the hardcore fanboys of each system. And, as most know, what gives the PS3 it's price is the included Blu-Ray drive, which is a next generation media format. I really wish Sony had just gone with a DVD9 Drive. But, they decided to put in a new format, that has yet to have it's future determined. Blu-Ray is currently being dominated by HD-DVD sales, and may turn out to be another failed Sony supported format. Or it may turn around. Much is still unknown. And to include a fairly unimportant factor, the Xbox 360's X12 DVD Drive has faster transfer speeds than the PS3's X2 Blu-Ray Drive, which in turn causes better loading times.
I'm fairly certain that that is a false statement, show me proof. The reason I say this is because the majority of the big film companies support BluRay exclusively with regualar DVD. You might be right, I would just find it hard to believe.
Log in to comment