I had a retail copy of Battlefield Bad Company 2 stashed up in the attic, and with the increase of popularity over the sales, I finally gave into it, and am downloading it through EA Download Manager right now.

Now, I used the account I made to play BC2, which is registered to an e-mail I don't use anymore, and I would like to change it. Is this possible? And if I register a different account(if it is not possible to change e-mail), then can I use the key on that?

This is REALLY old news. There was a thread like this sometime during the summer.

I really hope they make a great sequel to BF2. It was a great game back when people actually played it.

[QUOTE="SkullShooter17"]

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"] Whats yours ---_---

sn4k3_64

Sorry, but you are wrong. If you think the hitboxes in CS 1.6 are better than CSS, then you must either be drunk, or ignorant(mods, I am not offending him, so please, keep your fingers of the mouse that's hovering above the delete button). Personally, after playing 226 hours of CS 1.6, and getting a guest pass for CSS, I know I need to get it as soon as possible, because the detection has vastly improved. CSS is now king.

*Edit* My evidence is what I know and think. There's no reason for me to have to prove anything to you, because at the end of the day I am just happy that I am right, and that you're living in an illusion you created for yourself, which actually puts a smile on my face.

And the fact that I just noticed that headshots are almost random. Why? Well for one, I shot a guy in his knee with the AWP and got a headshot, and I shot a guy in his head 10 times, and didn't even damage him.

Who's trolling? You're the only one who's really not going by the book on the forums. I think I saw you quadruple post in another thread. Let's put this argument aside, and concentrate on actually arguing about the game, not about who's a troll and who isn't.

And, you aren't expressing an opinion when you say "CS 1.6 has better hitboxes than CSS". Why? You state it as a fact. It either is or isn't better, end of story.

[QUOTE="Daytona_178"]

[QUOTE="sn4k3_64"] I was wondering is the bullet drop the same for sniper rifles and standard assault rifles?sn4k3_64

I would also like to know the answer to this.

Sniper rifles are more powerful, so they have a less dramatic bullet drop. Assault rifles are weaker, hence the bullet drop is more significant.

[QUOTE="Dennislol123"]

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"] Sorry but i think your talking out of your...bum shall we say (being polite). If you think the hitboxes are better your clearly smoking something, theres no way they are better, they are far worse, and the guns are better because they handle more realisticly and you dont get people aimlessly spraying and getting kills. >.KHAndAnime

Sorry, but you are wrong. If you think the hitboxes in CS 1.6 are better than CSS, then you must either be drunk, or ignorant(mods, I am not offending him, so please, keep your fingers of the mouse that's hovering above the delete button). Personally, after playing 226 hours of CS 1.6, and getting a guest pass for CSS, I know I need to get it as soon as possible, because the detection has vastly improved. CSS is now king.

*Edit* My evidence is what I know and think. There's no reason for me to have to prove anything to you, because at the end of the day I am just happy that I am right, and that you're living in an illusion you created for yourself, which actually puts a smile on my face.

And the fact that I just noticed that headshots are almost random. Why? Well for one, I shot a guy in his knee with the AWP and got a headshot, and I shot a guy in his head 10 times, and didn't even damage him.

I need my Credit Card. If I don't get it before the next sales I will probably kill a dog... maybe a bird to feel less guilty...

[QUOTE="urbangamez"]

which COD are are you comparing it to? I did like the fact that you can flank and circle around the back of the enemy preoccupied with your squad plus the collectibles and the friendly banter with the squad in campaign mode, but i didn't think the graphics were up to 2010 standards.

sn4k3_64

Not amazing, but yes, they are good and better than Black Ops, but MW2 GFX are still comparable.

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"]

I have just been playing for a couple of hours.... and it reminded me of why I uninstalled in the first place.

SNIPERS !!!!

I will try to play a bit more, but I feel like I'm running most of the time and then shot in a second

Question: do I have to backup my profile? or it keeps it online?

XxspritexX

Yes they are. That was the annoying part of BC2 when I first got it. Over time, I learned the spots where Recon usually camps, and it wasn't too much of a hassle, but then... Camping tanks with engineers behind them came in...

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"]Would it be possible to COMPARE Game Modes with CoD? So sort of say RUSH is like DOMINATION on CoD.... cause I'm sort of confused as to what to do...yourmajesty90

You have to rig those M-Com Stations (They are indicated bu a big A or B) and kill anyone who comes close by. Make sure that people cover you, while arming and defending them. I prefer Conquest, really.

Rush is like S&D except that in S&D you don't respawn so...

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]1998-2002. No contest. :) PC Gaming was pretty solid up until 2004/2005, and has been sort of sliding downhill for me since. Xtasy26

I agree with this. Even up to 2005 PC gaming was solid. I believe over the last 5 years the two exceptions would be Crysis and Crysis Warhead which was specifically developed for the PC. It seems it has been medicore over the last 5 years due to consilitis. Just look what happened to the F.E.A.R., the first F.E.A.R. was great for the PC than the second one was a flop, they didn't even have a lean button because of "consolitis".

Crysis? Crysis? Crysis? Really? Good job on researching PC only games developed in the last 5 years...