I know this has been done to death, but what is going on GS? I thought after the whole Gerstmann debacle things would get better. If you read NeoJedi's blog yesterday or Joe Dodson's review of Army of Two, you know what I'm talking about. As if that wasn't bad enough, I log onto GS today and see the abysmal scores for Turning Point: FoL.
The score itself does not upset me as I haven't played the game, but the timing is extremely suspect. I understand that GS is now short-staffed and are notorious for taking a long time to hire new people, but is that really the reason the review went up so late? This game has been out long enough for thousands of people to buy it, without a review score from GS to help with the decision. I would think nothing of it, but during the whole Gerstmann incident there were insider reports detailing GS's review policies. According to those accounts, GS sometimes delayed the release of a review if the game received low scores. This practice is shady at best and clearly not favorable to the consumer. Is this what happened with Turning Point? I don't know. I do know that the site was plastered in ads for the game just a short while ago.
The bottom line here is that GS didn't get information to the readers in a timely fashion. Maybe they couldn't get a retail copy of the game early enough, maybe they were understaffed, maybe they wanted more time to test the online play, or maybe they purposely withheld the score as a favor to the publishers. If the worst case scenario is also the truth, then GS reviews have lost the last of my respect. Unfortunately for GS, any one of the remaining scenarios paints the site as an inefficient machine that can't get the job done.
Thank God for the community.
`Nick
EDIT: I know this blog seems kind of scathing, but it is not a reflection of my opinion of the entire site or the staff. There are still some excellent writers here and I love the site, it's just that the reviews section has become a joke. Gamespot used to be the only place I'd come to find out how good a game is. If GS gave a game an 8+, I wanted it. Not because I'm some mindless slug, but because I like that GS is harsh and I like that they don't shy away from criticizing great games. Now I feel like the whole system is falling apart; I can't even get a timely review on a relatively high-profile game. As I said above, I know the site is understaffed, but that is their problem, not mine. I make them money by coming to this site and they supply me with information. It's a fair trade and I used to feel like I was coming out way ahead because of all of the great coverage GS was supplying. In fact, I still feel that way, just not when it comes to reviews.
I'm not advocating anyone jump ship, because the site will eventually right itself (I hope). Instead, I just wrote this blog to vent my frustration at losing faith in my gaming mecca. In a glass-half-full sort of way, I'm really just providing valuable feedback to the manufacturer. Don't forget that the mods and staff actually read what we write. Here's to getting things back on track. *toast*
Log in to comment