SoyUnPerdedor's forum posts

Avatar image for SoyUnPerdedor
SoyUnPerdedor

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SoyUnPerdedor
Member since 2006 • 426 Posts
[QUOTE="SoyUnPerdedor"][QUOTE="RandomBeast"]Dude, its a minor inconveinience. And playing music in game? Has no one heard of a CD player or MP3 player?RandomBeast

Have you ever tried listening to two songs at the same time? Doesn't work out too well.

Yeah, good point, but you can turn off the in game music and listen to your own. Its not that hard to do.

Well, you can't always turn off the ingame music in every game. You can mute your tv, but that's no fun.

Custom music is so much fun to mess with if you're a music nerd. I'm thinking about getting Burnout now since they're letting you play whatever music is on your hard drive.

Avatar image for SoyUnPerdedor
SoyUnPerdedor

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 SoyUnPerdedor
Member since 2006 • 426 Posts
Dude, its a minor inconveinience. And playing music in game? Has no one heard of a CD player or MP3 player?RandomBeast

Have you ever tried listening to two songs at the same time? Doesn't work out too well.

Avatar image for SoyUnPerdedor
SoyUnPerdedor

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SoyUnPerdedor
Member since 2006 • 426 Posts
[QUOTE="SoyUnPerdedor"][QUOTE="mountain_duwe"]

Spider-Man 2 for PS2 was the best Spider-Man game ever. Spider-Man 3 was a terrible step backwards.

I'd love a Spider-Man game with Spider-Man 2's swinging and exploration, great current-gen graphics and a more adult-themed story, steered more towards the idea of Spider-Man getting owned by an enemy and bleeding, real blood, almost dying...and fighting an enemy, and defeating him by dismemberment. I'd love to see blood in a Spider-Man game.

mountain_duwe

Whoa, what the hell? I don't wanna see the Friendly Neighborhood Spiderman rip off some dude's head and drink blood out of his neck-hole.

I was thinking more along the lines of a very Spider-Man-esque method of defeating an enemy -- dropping a steel beam off of a crane, perhaps -- and having it landing on The Vulture, who just happens to be gliding by...and having that steel beam rip one of his wings off, sending blood spewing everywhere.

Is that something you might be interested in?

I'm down for them coming up for creative ways for using his powers. If they could come up with something like the train scene from Spiderman 2 that you could play through, I'd be amazed, but Spiderman doesn't viciously kill people. If they made this game super-violent, I don't care how much fun it is, I wouldn't play it.

Avatar image for SoyUnPerdedor
SoyUnPerdedor

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 SoyUnPerdedor
Member since 2006 • 426 Posts

Spider-Man 2 for PS2 was the best Spider-Man game ever. Spider-Man 3 was a terrible step backwards.

I'd love a Spider-Man game with Spider-Man 2's swinging and exploration, great current-gen graphics and a more adult-themed story, steered more towards the idea of Spider-Man getting owned by an enemy and bleeding, real blood, almost dying...and fighting an enemy, and defeating him by dismemberment. I'd love to see blood in a Spider-Man game.

mountain_duwe

Whoa, what the hell? I don't wanna see the Friendly Neighborhood Spiderman rip off some dude's head and drink blood out of his neck-hole.

Avatar image for SoyUnPerdedor
SoyUnPerdedor

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 SoyUnPerdedor
Member since 2006 • 426 Posts

I like mgs 3, but it's the most unintentionally hilarious game I've ever played.

Remember when eva gave snake a pistol and he delivered a 5 minute monologue about how it was the most amazing gun in the world? It went something like this - http://snakeonguns.ytmnd.com/

I chuckled when The Boss revealed her snake-shaped c-section scar. Then I LOL'ed when it actually turned into a snake and slithered away. Real subtle.

There's a guy in this game who fights you by throwing hornets. HORNETS.

Then there's the most amazing line ever in a videogame, dropped by Lyndon B. Johnson: "You are above even The Boss. I hereby award you the title of Big Boss. You are a true patriot." I always laugh when they use the name "Big Boss", but when the president officially hands it out to someone, that's when I just lose it.

Avatar image for SoyUnPerdedor
SoyUnPerdedor

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 SoyUnPerdedor
Member since 2006 • 426 Posts

Why release a spate of substories and sub-plots to the parent game when the parent game is out of print?Muramasa_Edge

$$$

Like you were saying, a big, big part of FF7's fanbase is a little bit nuts, and Square-Enix knows it. They'll throw down cash for anything that says "Final Fantasy" and "VII". They'd probably make a lot more money off of more little spinoffs than they would from a remake. Look at how well Crisis Core sold.

A re-release makes so much more sense to me. FF 7 used to be like $20-$30 on ebay a year or two ago. Now it's $90+. Obviously a lot of people don't care about graphics, because they're still buying it. I'm sure Square-Enix wants in on some of that cash.

I think everyone is tied up with Kingdom Hearts 3 and Final Fantasy 13, though. Then after 13 drops, they're going to make a bunch of spinoffs for it. If FF7 ever gets remade, it'll be a looooong way away.

What's with everyone saying they want a remake because they never got to play FF 7? If you want to play it, go buy it!

Avatar image for SoyUnPerdedor
SoyUnPerdedor

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 SoyUnPerdedor
Member since 2006 • 426 Posts

[QUOTE="SoyUnPerdedor"]Why would Square spend a ton of time, effort, and most importantly MONEY remaking the game from the ground up, when they could just release a couple of little pissy ff7 spinoffs and make even more money for less work? That strategy has been working really well for them for the past few years. I mean, that's why they've made so many spinoffs, right? Just throw in Cloud, Sephiroth, and some big swords and people will buy whatever they put out. They don't need to remake ff7 to make a ton of money.Muramasa_Edge

These spinoffs aren't just for the hardcore fans, Square are being extremely smart about this- they're introducing new players to this game world, they're trying to ignite interest among both new and old fans, and then as soon as demand is high enough- POW! The announcement, whatever the capacity, of a remake of FFVII.

Crisis Core didn't say at the end 'Play Final Fantasy VII' just to leave people in the dark- remember, I have to reiterate this; Final Fantasy VII is out of print, it isn't being made anymore- how are players supposed to get their hands on it? Answer? Either a release on PSN, which would be a wasted opportunity, or a re-release that would make one of the most succesful games of all time even more succesful; you have to think in terms of scale here, how many FFVII fans are there out there? Then add to that fans of the Dirge of Cerberus and Crisis Core games and you're talking lots more.

This won't simply be a game for the hardcore, Square are setting this up to be the most lucerative software move they've ever made, all they need to do is wait, generate the interest and then push the big red button. They've already got the XIII series coming, if they do this right they can and will re-ignite the flame of the Final Fantasy franchise.

They're not gonna re-ignite Final Fantasy by retreading an 11 year old game. Creatively, I mean. To me, that would kill Final Fantasy. It's like they're saying, "Final Fantasy 7 was the only game we ever made that was worth anything, so we're not going to try new things anymore." It already looks like that, but FF is on life support pretty much. A remake would be Square-Enix pulling the plug.

How are they gonna get FF7? The same way you get any old game - used game stores, ebay, friends, whatever. If you really want it, you can get it. You can find it on amazon.com for $90, which is crazy, but $60 for a ps3 game is crazy too. You might as well pony up 30 more bucks.

It would make so much more sense for Square to release it on PSN, I don't see how you can think that's a wasted opportunity. Think about it this way: Square can either hold up production for every other project they're working on, and spend many millions of dollars remaking Final Fantasy 7 for ps3, or they can release it on PSN, where they do NO work, spend NO money, and make 100% profit, because you know tons of people are going to buy it. They can even price-gouge people a little for it. I'm sure everyone would be cool with paying more than the $6 or $8 dollar usual for ps1 games, whatever it is. It's a hell of a lot better than paying $90 online. Hell, throw everything that was on the ps1 - FF 4,5,6,8,9, and Tactics up there, too, make even more free money. This works perfectly for Square and for fans.

I think people just say a remake is a sure thing because they really want it to happen. It's cool if someone thinks that - it COULD happen, but just because FF 7 is popular, it doesn't mean they'll remake it. I'd put my money on more spinoffs. They're easier, cheaper, and guaranteed to make a good profit.

Avatar image for SoyUnPerdedor
SoyUnPerdedor

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 SoyUnPerdedor
Member since 2006 • 426 Posts

I think it's crazy. They've already made two FF7 movies, a sequel, a prequel, a couple of other games, and people are still demanding more. If they ever do remake the game, people probably won't be satisfied. They'll be on message boards the day after it comes out, talking about how they have to make another sequel.

FF7 is fine already. A remake isn't gonna magically make it better, especially since you already know what everything and everybody looks like with more realistic graphics.

Avatar image for SoyUnPerdedor
SoyUnPerdedor

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 SoyUnPerdedor
Member since 2006 • 426 Posts
Why would Square spend a ton of time, effort, and most importantly MONEY remaking the game from the ground up, when they could just release a couple of little pissy ff7 spinoffs and make even more money for less work? That strategy has been working really well for them for the past few years. I mean, that's why they've made so many spinoffs, right? Just throw in Cloud, Sephiroth, and some big swords and people will buy whatever they put out. They don't need to remake ff7 to make a ton of money.
Avatar image for SoyUnPerdedor
SoyUnPerdedor

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SoyUnPerdedor
Member since 2006 • 426 Posts
Why would Square spend a ton of time, effort, and money remaking the game from the ground up, when they could just release a couple of little pissy ff7 spinoffs and make even more money for less work? That strategy has been working really well for them for the past few years. Just throw in Cloud, Sephiroth, and some big swords and people will buy whatever they put out. They don't need to remake ff7 to make a ton of money.