StrongDeadlift's forum posts

Avatar image for StrongDeadlift
StrongDeadlift

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By StrongDeadlift
Member since 2010 • 6073 Posts

Meh, notafuk given.

MS has 3 high profile exclusives lined up for the remainder of the year (including the biggest one, Halo, which Sony wont have anything to counter until next year). Sony also has jack shit lined up between the remainder of the year, and the majority of 2016, except for Uncharted, and TLG.

Even look at this past E3. Every single game (if Im not mistaken) that Microsoft showed at E3 is something that will physically exist in our hands within the next 18 months. Sony showed CGI trailers and a kickstarter for games that will not be anywhere close to existing in the next 2-3 years. Hell, fucking 9th gen consoles will see the light of day before that Final Fantasy remake does.

And taking into account the previous paragraph, Microsoft still has 3 OTHER high profile games that were not at E3, deliberately held back for Gamescom, that are all also coming next year (Quantum Break, Scalebound, Crackdown). Sony is not having a keynote at Gamescom.

Fine Cows, you "win" the first half of 2015. Bloodborne was awesome. Im fine with that, but come Halo time, you are going to get bludgeoned for the remainder of the year (and have a hard time next year), unless you really like sales. E3 2013 is a distant memory.

Avatar image for StrongDeadlift
StrongDeadlift

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 StrongDeadlift
Member since 2010 • 6073 Posts

@Slimmin360 said:

However Nintendo is not known for making such errors two times in a row

Wii>>>Wii U

DS>>>3DS

U Wot M8?

Avatar image for StrongDeadlift
StrongDeadlift

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 StrongDeadlift
Member since 2010 • 6073 Posts

And even in the demo, they still werent entirely clear what the point of the game is.

I feel like "deliberate ambiguity" is the new current trend being abused in indie development, where everybody is beginning to use the crutch of "deliberate ambiguity" (which itself is not inherently bad, see Journey, Metroid Prime, Fallout, etc....) as an excuse for they themselves not even knowing what they are or what their own identity is.

Everybody's Gone To The Rapture looks interesting, but also worries me for this reason.

Avatar image for StrongDeadlift
StrongDeadlift

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 StrongDeadlift
Member since 2010 • 6073 Posts

@speedfreak48t5p said:

.

Avatar image for StrongDeadlift
StrongDeadlift

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 StrongDeadlift
Member since 2010 • 6073 Posts

@Heirren said:

@StrongDeadlift:

Lol. Circular rut. Look at the dual shock controller. Sony has no clue.

The first sentence of the TC was my intended title. 60 character limit is a bitch.

Avatar image for StrongDeadlift
StrongDeadlift

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 StrongDeadlift
Member since 2010 • 6073 Posts

Will Nintendo ever free themselves from being an "in between" platform?We all remember the NES, SNES, N64, and Gamecube. When each Nintendo console had the most cutting edge hardware available on the market.

Given all the NX rumors, its all but cemented in stone the fact that the NX is either coming out next year, or the year after that. All evidence we currently have points to the NX releasing sooner, rather than later. With the Wii, Wii U, and now the NX, this makes the 3rd console gen in a row where Nintendo has a console with hardware "in between" generations, no doubt being forced to do so, to repair/regain gamer mindshare.

Do you think Nindendo will ever pull themselves out of this defeating cycle, that, by their own actions and through noone elses, they've spun themselves into? Do you think that the NX releasing sooner rather than waiting until at least 2018, Nintendo is in danger of continuing the cycle rather than breaking it, and repeating the Wii/Wii U?

Avatar image for StrongDeadlift
StrongDeadlift

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 StrongDeadlift
Member since 2010 • 6073 Posts

Allow me to show you the PS4's lineup for the rest of the year (and through most of next year)

Not Uncharted.

More not uncharted.

And um........

.......er.......

Avatar image for StrongDeadlift
StrongDeadlift

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 StrongDeadlift
Member since 2010 • 6073 Posts

@FoxbatAlpha said:

They are good but certainly no Star Wars Battlefront or Rise of the Tomb Raider.

You have to think how much more is going on in Fallout 4 also. The items, crafting and building. It looks like somewhat destructible environment too. All make for a really in depth game to put +100 hours into.

Wait a minute......one thing I never thought about, or looked into (or remember from bethesda's conference)........is there still loading screens every time you enter every building? Or did they finally get rid of that shit?

Avatar image for StrongDeadlift
StrongDeadlift

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 StrongDeadlift
Member since 2010 • 6073 Posts

@Blabadon said:
@StrongDeadlift said:

...is to tempur your expectations (Except for Cows though. I enjoy reading your stupidity :)

Yikes

Anyways, the RAM upgrade alone is enough to differentiate these consoles from old ones, not to mention 2011 laptop GPUs aren't anywhere near the PS4 and Xbox One's. You're thinking about CPUs, so good research there (unless you're misinformed enough to think a 680m could run The Witcher 3 at 1080p30 at medium to high settings).

As for your estimate of this stuff not being able to be done in 2011, who cares? The Order looks better than anything from that year. So does Uncharted. I'm playing Crysis 2 right now on Ultra, and no way does it look huge amounts better than Uncharted or The Order. The only huge difference is 60 FPS.

Pity for you that you don't see the difference between last gen consoles and these ones for the sake of an internet thread. There's a huge difference graphically when boosting your games to 1080p with better AA, being able to use better light reflection techniques, having better textures, and more environmental effects while running at better frame rates. Call it gen seven in a tux, it's still loads better than the PS3 and 360 were able to manage by 2013.

As for Fallout 4, it doesn't meet the texture work, animation quality, or sheer graphical fidelity that's present elsewhere in gaming today. Not a terribly ugly game, but the color palette it has isn't doing it any favors.

I actually caught that before hitting submit, but forgot to fix it lol. Oh well.

Anyways, the PS4 uses literally a 7970m (pitcarn) with two of the twenty CUs fused off for redundancy (and also clocked lower than the real 7970m is. In the end, it gets 2.1TF to the PS4's 1.8. The Xbox One uses a 7870m (bonaire) with two extra CUs. (both consoles actually use the 8000 series versions of those, which are identical, just OEM rebrands with an improved implimentation of the Zero Core tech added or whatever. (I believe))

Point is, if you built a PC in 2011, it would have been a joke even then, to buy something like these.

Avatar image for StrongDeadlift
StrongDeadlift

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 StrongDeadlift
Member since 2010 • 6073 Posts

@SolidGame_basic said:

Not fanboy wars

??? This thread is about Fallout 4?