[QUOTE="andrewham7"][QUOTE="shadimoscouplos"]

Actually, some people like me have all "next-gen" consoles...

But if I were to choose a console for gameplay (right now that is), I believe I will actually choose an Xbox 360. People want to know "how Shadi, How???". Its actually because of Xbox 360's features, and game library. Yeah, the wii has a good line-up coming but still right now, ill choose Xbox 360. Xbox 360's library is incredible.

But once again, if I were to choose which ones capability is better (gameplay wise), ill choose the Wii mainly because of its motion controls.

And thats that.:D

shadimoscouplos

please explain to me how XBOX's library is "incredible". What xbox exclusive games (that arent shooters) are "incredible"???

Your playing, right?

Would you take Wii's line-ip over Xbox 360's?

Now that I noticed it, 360 and PS3 have some/most similar titles, and developers are refusing to make those games for the wii.

Some nice Xbox games, Mass Effect, DiRT, Halo 3, Gears of War, Saints Row, Forza, Crackdown, etc. Just to name a few.

Mass Effect is coming out to PC, and Gears of War already has a PC port. Saints Row and Crackdown seem alright. No interest in Forza or Halo 3 (got tired of the series after Halo 2). Some nice Wii titles: Super Smash Bros. Brawl, Super Mario Galaxy, No More Heroes, Metroid Prime 3, Legend of Zelda: TP, Super Paper Mario, Zack and Wiki, just to name some. So yeah, personally I'd rather have a Wii than a 360 right now

Now, ask me if I'd want a 360 after Ninja Gaiden 2 comes out, I'll answer an emphatic "yes!"

[QUOTE="JordanElek"]

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]I think he should apologize for PR reasons, he IS the company he IS the game he IS the brand name. Without his name on games most people would completely overlook them.Jaysonguy

That's part of the answer I was looking for. So to clarify, you think that the result of his apology would be a better image for his games and thus better selling games in the future?

If the game was glitch free (don't care about opinions on the content) then no. That's not in the makeup of his image he's tried to create. He's one brash player in the video game field, he's one hep cat and we can only hope he makes more games that "break the rules"

Since the game was not on the same tier as competing titles I think he should take his hat in hand and apologize because I think it would push people like myself (I know there's not a lot, I'll let you decide if that's good or bad) to pick up his next game.

At the very least say that the next one is going to be better. Instead he's there saying this is the best.

He screwed up and blamed everyone but himself. That's not even part of the punk persona he tries to make believe he is. It's kinda just the opposite.

What competing titles are you refering to? I don't know anything in recent memory like No More Heroes, and even if there were similar titles, why should he apologize to the gaming public if they were better? If you didn't like the game, that's fine, but why should the creator apologize for you not liking his product? Do you want developers to form your own opinions and tastes for you so we'll all be insync with each other next time?

And I don't remember seeing one article where he says No More Heroes is the best. At most, he just says that he thought the market would be more favorable to his game, not "Wii owners are idiots who don't know a good 'hardcore' title" like you seem to think he's constantly saying. No blame was put on anyone; just the fact that his own personal claim was misproven. Even if he did think his game is awesome (and to me, it is), what's wrong with being proud of your work? If I ever made a game, I'd try to hype it up as much as possible!