(September) Halo: Reach

(November) Gran Turismo 5 andLittleBigPlanet

(February)Killzone 3, Motorstorm: Appocalypse, and MLB 11: The Show

Now, if we extend it 2 months AFTER that, then Lemmings get 2 AAAE in that time (Gears of War 3)but that also gives Cows 6 AAAE (Infamous 2).

The best part about them all, is that each of the PS3 games listed, almost ALL of them are going to be graphics kings.

And by Guarranteed AAA Exclusives, I mean at Metacritic and Gamerankings. As if they all dont also have AAA on lock at Gamespot as well lol.

Inb4 only gamespot matters.

We use gamespot to compare "Flops", but when comparing quality titles, everywhere else is on the table.

And not to forget The Last Guardian and Agent also. We dont know much about those games but they are 2 names worth throwing out there.

[QUOTE="Silverbond"]

Forza 4?

D-RS

http://ps2.ign.com/objects/014/014552.html

I would make sure that I buy it used, so that Activision doesnt get a cut from the money, and I would ONLY be buying it for Blizzard's support.

None in 2010 really. I am hyped for Medal of Honor though.

As for Exclusives in 2011, Killzone 3 and Motorstorm Apocalypse. And we get both in february, along with MLB The Show 11

Hey, check it out, real 360 footage from GamesCom, not footage from over 2 months ago (ie, worst footage you could find):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhMuELxXk7U

Looks fine to me.

NotTarts

1. It was pretty much proven that that was PC footage being played with a 360 controller, I could be wrong

2. The video I linked in the original post is from August 20th, and is the most recent video on gametrailer's page for the game lol. Its not like I scoured the internet to defile Crysis 2's name or something :roll:

you do realize that the PC version is packed with more graphical features than you'll ever see in a console game, at least till next generation. Modern Warfare looks like a console game, face it the graphics are bland. I can't say that I'm very impressed by what they showed from KZ3 either. When it comes to console games the technical beauty is always skin-deep, just so you know.

fireballonfire

Now as for Killzone 3, These 3 videos crap all over anything shown for crysis 2 on consoles:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_xSqPOCG58

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/gc-10-killzone-3/703125

http://videos.videogameszone.de/v/nf3BOqzVAcl/Killzone-3/Spielszenen-von-der-gamescom-2010/

Crysis 2:

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/gc-10-crysis-2/703333

[QUOTE="TheMISCMan48"]

I based my opinion off of the two videos in my original post. In those videos, Modern Warfare 2 looks much more eye pleasing than Crysis 2 (on consoles).That said, Killzone 3 will rape both of them in the face. And both KZ3,Black ops, and MOH look more fun and engaging to play than Crysis 2

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]cryengine 3 > modified quake 3 engine. That is all.Punjabiking101

You play engines, I play games.

I dont know Crysis 2 is being hyped for graphics on consoles. Not only does the gameplay incredibly booring conpared to Modern Warfare 2, Modern Warfare also looks miles better in graphics.

Watch this Modern Warfare 2 gameplay video:

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/cliffhanger-demo-modern-warfare/702585

And then watch this Crysis 2 gameplay (360):

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/gc-10-crysis-2/703333

Modern Warfare 2 not only craps all over it in graphics, the gameplay in this video looks 100 times more fun to play.

Honestly, there are dosens of other shooters comming out that look way superior in both gameplay and graphics that are way more deserving of the hype.

Call of Duty: Black Ops, Medal of Honor, and Killzone 3 will drown the very life out of this game in both fun value and graphics.

I say 8.5 on gamespot at best.

Also, Hermits, this is STRICTLY about the console version. I fully acknowlege your superiority on the graphics front, and recognize my place in the hardware department :P

This is about the CONSOLE version of Crysis 2.