TheSterls' forum posts

Avatar image for TheSterls
TheSterls

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 TheSterls
Member since 2009 • 3117 Posts

[QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]

[QUOTE="rumbalumba"]

Gears of 3 what? :lol:

After_Math

those are 2 different games, should I post Battlefield 3 shots, and say Uncharted what?

"But but that's PC!!!111 Graphics on PC don't count!" or "Uncharted looks just as good as Battlefield!" Those are the replies you will get. Don't bother, Cows have been doing this the last few years. Remember those Crysis vs. Killzone threads?

I see more hermits jumping in with (zomg teh battle for second place) more then anything else.

Avatar image for TheSterls
TheSterls

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 TheSterls
Member since 2009 • 3117 Posts

[QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]It's a double standard you're largely trying to create, as people have noted these fanboys you're trying to call out either don't exist or are nowhere near as pervasive as you're trying to convey.

The Sony conference was mediocre. People who wish to think otherwise are welcome to their opinion, but if they think it was somehow spectacular, IMO, they're deluding themselves.

Stevo_the_gamer

Not really, it's pretty obvious that folks can see what I was trying to convey--Microsoft was looked under a microscope but not Sony. Simple really. Look at the Microsoft reactions, and then the Sony ones... Practically the same food, just a different restaurant. I was amused by the rather "generous" reactions from the Sony conference, as were others it appears.

Because Sony's confrence was simply better? What triple A game did Micrsoft actually show gameplay of? Gears of War 3 and thats about it. Sony has RE3, UC3 and Starhawk. Not to mention a brand new handheld is more appealing then a bunch of crap with motion controls.

Avatar image for TheSterls
TheSterls

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 TheSterls
Member since 2009 • 3117 Posts

Lol bringing up graphics when battlefield 3 demolished everything. The fight for a distant 2nd best continues.MFDOOM1983

Your comparing a high end pc game( one that your pc most likely wont have the ablity to even at 15fps on the settings in the trailer) to a handheld? Good lord I just dont understand hermits. But dont worry if BF3 looks that great now just imagine how awesome the next PS and Xbox will be.

Avatar image for TheSterls
TheSterls

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 TheSterls
Member since 2009 • 3117 Posts

[QUOTE="wolverine4262"][QUOTE="soulitane"]I think it's mainly because people thought it was going to be a lot more. I agree with you on the games though.Cafe2012
if anyone thought itd be priced over $300 then they simply didnt understand the hardware.

Silly fanboys were expecting PS3 graphics.

It blows the doors off the I pad from a graphical standpoint and they start out at 600++

Avatar image for TheSterls
TheSterls

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 TheSterls
Member since 2009 • 3117 Posts

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

You guys do realize this is a demo right? And has like anohter year in dev?

Dr_Snood

From the looks of it the developer seems very keen on keeping QTEs considering they're in almost EVERY kill. Also UTs seem way too spammable now without any need for a strategic approach to them. The UTs probably also won't change because RYU's arm seems to be a huge part of the game.

I know that it's a demo, but some things look like they won't be leaving the final version of the game.

The QTE's were to demonstrate the metal on bone action. I doubt you will be able to do that every time and they listen to feedback also. Notice in one scene when he slides it does the qte and later on he does the same slide without the button combos popping up. Im not sure why everyone is being so negative. Did everyone want it to be just like the last 2? Or should I say last 4 if I count NGS and NGS2? I think the stealth kills are awesome and some of the events give the game alot better pacing. If they turn the QTE buttons down a little bit and make some of the limbs start flying off I think this could easily be the best NG.

Avatar image for TheSterls
TheSterls

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 TheSterls
Member since 2009 • 3117 Posts

[QUOTE="the-obiwan"]i dont have time to watch anything right now so... does anyone care enough ( and have time ) to explain me whats the Goods and the downfalls about ng3? thanks :]Sparky04
It looks about as good as Ninja Gaiden 2 graphically except with fewer obvious mistakes like floating blood and limbs, it also seems to have a more consistent framerate, the pacing in the combat looks slower than 2 and faster than Ninja Gaiden Black. There are now very short QTE, as in do an obliteration and then press an additional button to get the kill, Ryu's infected arm has given him a very crazy Ulitmate Attack that allows him to teleport to multiple different enemies, hopefully this will fix the issue where Ryu would charge up an attack then them aim at the wrong thing and miss. There are now stealth kill options if you sneak up on an enemy alone meaning that unlike the first two games enemies don't automatically know where you are. Other than that it looks like if you liked the first two games then you could pick this up immediatly and have no problem playing. The camera also seemed to not be an issue during the demo which was nice though it was very busy(you just need to watch it to see what I mean)

I thought the texture detailhas been raised qutie a bit look at the details in ryu's outfit.

Avatar image for TheSterls
TheSterls

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TheSterls
Member since 2009 • 3117 Posts

You guys do realize this is a demo right? And has like anohter year in dev?

Avatar image for TheSterls
TheSterls

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 TheSterls
Member since 2009 • 3117 Posts

[QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"]

[QUOTE="Superbored"]

Looks okay, the square button pops up way too much and I hate the new voice though.

MobilechicaneX

Yeah the new voice sucks major balls. He can't even do corny western dubbing right :lol:

I hate how he got so many voice changes. His English VA in the first was great.

This guy also does Ryu's English voice in Dead or Alive: Dimensions so he might be staying for good. I prefer his Japanese voice, anyway. Since he's always voiced Ryu in DoA/NG. And he sounds badass.

Who plays Ryu's voice with the English DUB:lol:

The Japanese voice actor has alwasy done a stellar job with him.

Avatar image for TheSterls
TheSterls

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 TheSterls
Member since 2009 • 3117 Posts

what have they done to ninja gaiden do not want.mattacular

Slightly upgraded the visuals and put blood in it? How could you not like it if you like NG. I think it looks awesome.

Avatar image for TheSterls
TheSterls

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 TheSterls
Member since 2009 • 3117 Posts

They arent going to port Diablo 3.

If they had intended to do so, it would have been announced along with its initial unveiling. It isnt like Blizzard is hurting for resources to create a console porting team.

But based on the leaked time-tables for Blizzard, they are trying to port parts of Battle.net to consoles and eventually create their own competitor to Steam/GFWL/and other DD's. Supposedly even CoD will be running on Battle.net by around 2013'ish.

XaosII

That may be the worst logic ive ever heard? PC comapnies annouce ports later all the time. Hell look at the Witcher 2. Why would they create a battle net for consoles with no game for it?