@Double-Ego The "objectivity" of your post is amazing.....

lol

Also, I like how you say we know nothing for a fact, yet act as if you can state facts yourself.

@MAD_AI Everyone with any knowledge of tech hardware knows that the PS4 is below the over hyped expectations.

@Mega_Loser @Double-Ego shhhhhhhhhhhhh... Double-Ego thinks there must be some other mystical explanation for those things other than the obvious one that the PS4 is, as it says on the spec sheet, not as powerful as a 680

@Double-Ego Exactly - you're speculating. Stop pretending otherwise.

You can't defend your speculation over against someone else's speculation by making nonsensical claims about "objectivity".

@Hillsy_ Everything is about graphics. If there were no graphics, you couldn't play video games.

@Double-Ego That you think it's likely that the PS4 will be equivalent to a 680 in terms of what it can do graphically.

Which IMO is nonsense.

@Double-Ego And you are basing your statement on speculation about how well they can optimize for a console vs a PC...

@Double-Ego The specs we have indicate, along with the piece from Digital Foundry, that this console cannot currently do what a 680 can do.

I don't understand what is so hard to understand about that. The only way you can get around that is to start making wild speculation about how well they can optimize things on the PS4 vs a PC.

And the thing that makes you subjective is that you are sharing your personal opinions/thoughts/etc in a comments section. Maybe you need to read your own definition again. Maybe read it twice.

@Double-Ego Based on that logic, I could say that you don't know that the PS4 will run anything beyond SNES graphics, because it's not released yet.

And stop with the silly "objective" thing. If you want to construe yourself as neutral, that's fine. But you already disproved the notion of "objectivity" yourself with your own definition.

@Mega_Loser huh?