Ok, I'm only going to continue this because Mr. Donut still hasn't replied. Let's take a look at what you typed:
asking a theist to give examples and proof as to why he is a theist is like trying to describe colours to a blind man that was born blind. It can't be done.BumFluff122
If you are trying to imply that it is the theist who is blind, then your post should have read like this: "asking a theist to give examples and proof as to why he is a theist is like a blind man that was born blind trying to describe colors. It can't be done."
What you said was, "...like trying to describe colours to a blind man that was born blind. It can't be done". So, trying to describe something to someone who can't see it. Hmm, who would be doing the describing in this case? The theist would be. Therefore, with the atheist being the listener in this scenario, your post implies that a theist could explain his beliefs all day, and the atheist, being born blind, could never understand. If you meant to agree with me, you should have paid more attention to what you were typing. Because as it stands now, your analogy doesn't fit your intended point.
Log in to comment