Theokhoth's forum posts

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

356

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts
[QUOTE="needled24-7"]

good question. i imagine if they had to do some fighting it would be uncomfortable and hard to fight like that.

atony12
that's why its a ceremonial helmet not a combat helmet

But what if they need to do combat during a ceremony? :?
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

356

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts
It's fake.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

356

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

It looks ridiculously stupid. Is there a reason for this?

The Guards Regiments #5



Apparently it's not just British either.. Royal Thai Guard.

th3warr1or

That one looks like it was made with Lady Gaga's hair.

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

356

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts
It's not right, but it's not disallowed.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

356

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts
Some lint.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

356

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts
[QUOTE="topsemag55"]So nobody cares that he sent a X-rated pic of himself to a woman? Just because he's liberal, he gets off scot-free?

Why should anybody care? It has nothing to do with his job and it's not illegal to send x-rated pictures to people. Have you even read this topic? :|
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

356

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"] Your entire argument is based on the premise of a conspiracy theory. . ."He's a liberal! The fact that his campaign is conservative proves it!" "Every indication"? Such as? Did the Democrats plant him there, like the Wisconsin Republicans? Where is your proof--and please, don't post an article quoting crazy teabaggers and whining about "teh libral media" every other paragraph.YellowOneKinobi

Also, Jack Davis was a republican for over 50 years, before he switched over to the democratic party in 2004 (due primarily to a petty feud involving Dick Cheney), and then in 2008 switched back to the republican party. This is not a man that has strong ties with the Democratic party.

Yet he didn't run as a Republican.

He ran as an independent--on the Tea Party line.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

356

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"]Are you kidding? Jack Davis ran in three previous elections as a democrat. Directing me to a poorly put together website (with the purpose of supporting his 'claim' to be an official Tea Party candidate) doesn't change that fact.

YellowOneKinobi

That's his campaign website. :| And so what? People can't change parties? Finally, even if you're correct, like Sun_Tzu said: there's a difference between a Republican-Party-sanctioned disguise and a single Democrat cashing in on the Tea Party cow.

If you were a liberal, posing as a conservative with the sole purpose of splitting the conservative base, what would your site look like?:| Also, there is every indication that the democrats here in NY reached out to Davis. So I'm not sure what the "party-sanctioned" comment you made is all about. Once again I'm saying both parties are crooked, and it seems once again you're saying, "no because....because....because the republicans are just worse."

Your entire argument is based on the premise of a conspiracy theory. . ."He's a liberal! The fact that his campaign is conservative proves it!" "Every indication"? Such as? Did the Democrats plant him there, like the Wisconsin Republicans? Where is your proof--and please, don't post an article quoting crazy teabaggers and whining about "teh libral media" every other paragraph.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

356

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"]Goes both ways, pal. Things like this

YellowOneKinobi

Erm, Jack Davis is running on the Tea Party line, regardless of what some Teabagger says about him. No really, look: http://www.jackdavis.org/issues/

Unlike James Smith, who is a Republican posing as a Democrat on Republican approval.

Are you kidding? Jack Davis ran in three previous elections as a democrat. Directing me to a poorly put together website (with the purpose of supporting his 'claim' to be an official Tea Party candidate) doesn't change that fact.

That's his campaign website. :| And so what? People can't change parties? Finally, even if you're correct, like Sun_Tzu said: there's a difference between a Republican-Party-sanctioned disguise and a single Democrat cashing in on the Tea Party cow.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

356

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]So where's the media attention for matters like this? Where's the outrage, OT?YellowOneKinobi

Goes both ways, pal. Things like this

Erm, Jack Davis is running on the Tea Party line, regardless of what some Teabagger says about him. No really, look: http://www.jackdavis.org/issues/

Unlike James Smith, who is a Republican posing as a Democrat on Republican approval.