@Gladestone1 Yeah man, DRM's don't do what they are intended to do unless they are intended to be marketing tools, which isn't far off. You can't just accept things because they are happening. Plus, look at the statistics, pirating is on the up and up, and up. I'm not saying that I pirated anything, but I actually don't buy games that have DRM outside of Steam; and that's only because I consider Steam to be in the same category as PSN and XBL.
This show is really growing on me. It would be cool if you did a series of games to show the advancements between the games and the years that they where released.
Why do simulation games get rated at PEGI 3? You cant tell me that a fictional over the top nonsense universe could do more potential damage than piloting a plane, train or street sweeper in real life environments WITHOUT the ability to run people over. You have no idea how much someone might want to run someone over in a street sweeper after the simulation showed them how to operate the vehicle whilst pedestrians where tantalizingly close. If ima rampage, its going to be because I'm bored, not because I suddenly believe that I can tear out a mans intact spine with lightning shooting out of my hands. You would have to be stupid to think that's possible.
@TJSpyke @Jaga_Telesin Yeah, I totally agree with Jaga. The whole thing is a marketing tool to keep you spending your hard earned moneys on Ubisoft content exclusively. I submit that you are the, well, I'm not that mean, but yours is certainly a short thought.
They make an amazing one-in-a-million game that is followed by a sequel which perfectly expands on the first. That game wins game of the year and nets a ton of money. I'm going to remain optimistic, but they should just make a different game entirely with the resources. Having them fade away under the weight of success in an industry that is famous for milking the crap out of ideas is a waste of an awesome development team.
Special news report, 89% of parents will tell you Santa Claus is real without knowing exactly why they are doing it. Come on, seriously, we all know that our parents don't know anything.
I mean, yeah this could open the door to a bunch of bad, but the game burning was very similar. We speak, and spoke out and will continue to do so against those who want to bend personal freedom, however, in this case I think they are justified.
The studies are in and the facts are out, violent video games cause kids to have the same emotions that they have when they stub their toe or break their toy, all things that could be linked to violent behavior, but not usually. It would, however, be stupid to say that violent kids do not play violent video games.
The responsibility of their introduction in to normal social behavior is on the parents if you ask me, but if we at least let them take violent games out of public places where parental consent isn't always present, maybe we can find some middle ground and final get left to blowing up zombies in peace
Timmy_Gwar's comments