I was under the impression that Prey did something like that, before SMG...jethrovegas

Prey was nowhere near on the same level as Super Mario Galaxy and Dead Space though. Prey could only handle 6 dimensions of gravity. I'm wouldn't even consider that to be what I'm talking about.

One could say that Prey was the precursor that led up to Super Mario Galaxy, perhaps. But Super Mario Galaxy definitely innovated.

Chronologically do you think Dead Space will be the second game that uses multi-dimensional gravity physics?
Obviously everyone on this forum knows Nintendo did it first but does that mean Dead Space is doing it second?

I'm not really new here I only post when I see something as ridiculous as thisedo-tensei

So your Bill Gates? Typical Lemming. :roll:

[QUOTE="Tony-Harrison"]

[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola2"] I have not played the other fallout games, and its not the gore that interests me...and none of my friends are hyped for the gore either. All i see is smug pc know it alls shunning the game becouse its not "true to its roots". That has nothing to do with how good the game will be at all, its just going in a different direction.dc337

Were not being smug. Fallout 3 is being sold on the reputation of the Fallout licence. Fallout gained it's reputation for not being precisely what it is now, a casual RPG.

The fallout franchise was sold by interplay to bethesda for cold hard cash which means they can do whatever they want with it.

I for one played Fallout 2 and am glad it is going 3d. 2d isometric games made a lot more sense when hardware was limited. Those games also play much better with a mouse which makes them less ideal for a multiplat release.

I'm surprised so many Fallout fans are complaining since things could be a lot worse. Just be glad that they didn't turn Fallout into a family friendly Wii game.

It may as well have been.

I have not played the other fallout games, and its not the gore that interests me...and none of my friends are hyped for the gore either. All i see is smug pc know it alls shunning the game becouse its not "true to its roots". That has nothing to do with how good the game will be at all, its just going in a different direction.hip-hop-cola2

Were not being smug. Fallout 3 is being sold on the reputation of the Fallout licence. Fallout gained it's reputation for not being precisely what it is now, a casual RPG.

Next Generation will not be about Motion Sensing or HD. Those are both current generation. No new consoles for 5 more years please. This war hasn't even started yet.

no there greatnaruto7777

They have lost their depth.

[QUOTE="Tony-Harrison"]

Precisely my point, Fallout 3 has been dumbed down.

It's casuals like YOU who are ruining the industry mate.

Vyyral

If he hasn't played the first two then why should he care about the bastardization of the series? This game under any other name would be viewed as nothing but a promising game. If he hasn't played the first two, why should he care that it is different than them?

And people who visit gamespot forums are not the casuals ruining the industry.

Of course there are casuals on Gamespot! They are the ones who don't mind getting a shallowed down version of a game that acquired it's reputation for being deep and intelligent.

[QUOTE="Tony-Harrison"][QUOTE="TheOwnerOner"][QUOTE="Tony-Harrison"]

[QUOTE="TheOwnerOner"]Fallout 3 looks more fun.TheOwnerOner

Interesting selection. Have you played either franchise before?

Nope,

but turnbase strategy RPGs bore me.

Hah. Fallout 1 & 2 where turn based. If you've never played either then what do you assume the turn based combat is like?

Your just a fanboy.

we're talking about Jagget Alliance Vs Fallout 3 you dumb sh@# face.

When did Fallout 1 & 2 ever enter the conversation.

Reading comprehension is your friend.

Precisely my point, Fallout 3 has been dumbed down.

It's casuals like YOU who are ruining the industry mate.