I believe ONlive is a console competitor more than a PC competitor.

Filthybastrd

If that's true,

then it will never succeed.

I've seen their little hardware box thing, and You need retail to support it....the Targets, the Best Buy's, the Walmarts, Gamestops, etc etc.

Why would they stock it if there are no games for them to sell?

Onlive for retail is dead on arrival, pretty much.

[QUOTE="rawrB"]

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Because the 360 is easier to develop for so multiplatform developers have an easier time.
Exclusives on the other hand Sony is able to pump massive loads of money, time, and even offer up programmers to 1st party developers to get the most out of the ps3.

The power is there in the 360 RE5 and Gears of war 2 and3 prove that, Microsoft just doesn't pump time, money and programmers into their limited 1st party and 3rd party like Sony does.

PAL360

If that was true, then:

1 - Why only 2 or 3 PS3 exclusives do look sligtly better than Gears2?

2 - Why dont multiplats developped first on PS3 and then ported to 360 look better on PS3?

3 - Why does 360 have the best looking and performing version of RDR, one of the biggest and most complex games on consoles?

4 - Why only Sony first party devs say PS3 is more powerfull?

5 - Why do games like Rage and Gears3 look as good as the most impressive exclusives on the 'superior' console?

I understand earlier PC3 owners prefer to believe PS3 is everything Sony said so, but infact 360 and PS3 are closer than what they were supposed to be.

For simplicy's sake, I will answer 2 and 3....

2. Some games that are led developed on the PS3 do look better on the PS3.

3. RDR is using the same RAGE engine as GTA4. Back in 2007 that engine was giving Rockstar problems because back then no one knew how to program for the PS3. Most engines back then made little to no use of the SPE's of the Cell Processor. GTA4 was Sub HD, and consequently, so is RDR.

Bonus...#5...We don't know how Rage and Gears 3 actually look because no one has actually played them...no beta, no demo, no nothing. Lets wait for that before we start jumping to conclusions one way or the other.

Tekken 5 isn't on the PS3.

breakinglaws

Thank you.

Typo.

I'll fix it.

The reason some (not all) XBOX 360 games look better than PS3 is because said developer didn't try to use the PS3's SPE's of the Cell Processor correctly. They will often try to program their games like a PC and the PS3 will not perform as well.

Lazy and low brow developers do it this way.

I was going over a debate on YouTube and this guy named 7th Level threw out tons of game that even I didn't know had actually sold more on the PS3.

Those games include

Final Fantasy 13

Devil May Cry

Castlevania

Bayonetta

Resident Evil 5

Street Fighter 4

Super Street Fighter 4

Tekken 6

Blazeblue: Calamity Trigger

BlazBlue: Continuum Shift

Fist Of The North Star

Dynasty Warriors 6

Lost Planet 2

Nier

Resonance Of Fate

Sonic Sega All Stars Racing

Burnout Paradise

Dante's Inferno

Blur

Split/Second

Need For Speed: Shift

Need For Speed: Hot Pursuit

Batman Arkam Asylum

Just Cause 2

Dead Space

Prince Of Persia: The Forgotten Sands

Darksiders

Alpha Protocol

Colin McRae Dirt 2

Fifa Soccer 11

Ghostbusters

Grid

Spiderman: Shattered Dimensions

Tomb Raider: Underworld

X-Men Origins: Wolverine

Quantum Theory

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7Ug6o8kFd8

Furthermore, in 2009 fiscal, Sony sold 115 million units of Software whereas XBOX 360 sold 103 million units.

And before anyone wants to discredit the source, I should warn you first.....they are based off of Sony's Fiscal Year reports

that ended March 31, 2010.

http://www.psuni.com/ps3-software-sales-outstrip-xbox-360s-ps3-attach-rate-up-to-8-1-3807/

I'm not really into sales, but I get tired of all of the misinformation...hopefully this will help

Some of it is an opinion, like the interface preference, or the movie services. Most of it is factual though, backed up by comparisons, research and knowledge of the services. PSN has slower download speeds and installs, this is a fact, not an opinion. Live generally gets more DLC and the DLC that it shares with PSN usually comes out on Live first, this is a a fact, not an opinion. Case West. Case Zero., Dead Money and on top of that things like the Black Ops DLC launching on Live first. Chat structure, faster DL speeds, more content, content first on Live. These are factual points here. You're right, if all you want is online play then obviously PSN would be the better choice, but its a combination of these things that make Live worth the 3 or 4 dollars a month. worldsworstgame

Most of what you say is incorrect too.

Is it a fact that PSN downloads slower for you. Sure. But I don't think you've talked to every PSN user....or am I wrong about that and you did?

Then you named what, 4 or 5 DLC units and you think that substatiates what you say as fact? I think not.

You see the fact is, PSN gets games and DLC first sometimes.....XBOX LIVE gets games and DLC first sometimes....that's a fact.

I suggest you use the term fact where it's valid.....it certainly wasn't here.

People can have opinions based on vids an pics.

Im still waiting for you to prove your claim. Where are the media press that said KZ3 looks better than Gears3?

PAL360

You have me confused.....I never said that.

However, Killzone 3 has playable gameplay, Gears 3 has not.

So as of now...Killzone 3, on the basis of it being tangible, Killzone 3 is proven to have better gameplay graphics than Gears 3.....period.

Lmao neo geo...sad. XBLA easily, best arcade games ever!Blixxed

Also YOUR opinion.

PSN has about 500 games Plus 120 or so PS1 classics.

Now if you say XBOX LIVE has more games, then I might agree...but better? No.