[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

With sony's 2011 line up it'd be silly if it doesn't pass the 360. But, stranger things have happened. "looks at the gamecube" :(

anyways i don't really care lol

GreySeal9

How so? Getting super excited about a line up on SW does not equate to real world sales.

All of those games are going to help.

Already, as said, the PS3 will sell 15 million units at its fiscal year. The next one after that, probably 17 or 18 million units (a price drop in 2011 will help that)

As is, XBOX 360 has never sold 15 million units in its fiscal year....not ever.

Of course they "can" work on them, but really do you want to have to sacrifice things for them to work?

Wasdie

What sacrifice?

Consoles at their core are basically PC's themselves, sans Windows. They even have USB ports and K/M support.

As a matter of fact, Consoles aren't even the "least common denominator".....PC's are.

Sure, at the high end PC's are surely the best, but people seem to convieniently forget that developers construct their games with low end PC's in mind too just so they can sell their game, and consoles are better than those.

So I ask....What sacrifice are you refering to?

They own Blizzard and Bungie soooo... as long as the games are good yes I am.

SapSacPrime

Activision does not own Bungie.

Bungie didn't want to be owned anymore and bought there way away from Microsoft, and now Activision is Publishing their games for 10 years....not own.

I haven't bought even 1 single Activision game this entire generation.

This isn't a surprise.

Sony gave this forcast at the begining of their fiscal year, and they always meet their predictions. Last year they predicted 13 million and they sold about 13.6.

They'll probably end their next fiscal at about 16 million.

I don't care how many Kinects are sold, There really is no stopping the PS3 at this point.

Its shareholders dont see it profiting all too well, and it doesnt contribute anything to gaming, no good exclusives and constantly riping off its consumers with needless attachements and charging for online, which ny the way it doesnt cost a dime for them to run. if it drops out of the console market i wouldnt miss it at all. no console i ever owned has given me so much headaches and caused a bigger dent in my wallet.

right4dead

I think that even though you're clearly trolling, with some bad information, I do think that there's a slight chance that this could happen.

Why? Because Microsoft isn't acting like a Serious Console maker. Instead of building their stable of first party studios, they close most of them down. That's doesn't seem to resemble a company looking for growth in the console hardware business....that resembles a company with possible aspirations of a possible cut and run....a clean escape or getaway whenever the time should arise.

Afterall, Video games is only something Microsoft essentially just "does on the side".

Overall, I don't want this to happen, because even though Microsoft has done some harm, like charging to play online, thereby causing others to try and charge...overall I think Microsoft has created competition and competition is good for consumers.

While I like Sony better than Microsoft, in no way do I feel Sony can or should be left to their own devices in the video game industry.....they can't be trusted either.

So why are we doubting SONY capability to adapt to the DD market in the next few years and not Nintendo capability since I'm very sure SONY is more capable of adapting to the market changes than Nintendo since they are a way bigger company?

Kashiwaba

You asked a good question and made a very good point.

But the reason is because there are some people that genuinely want Sony to fail and exit the gaming industry.

How ever, there's less than a snowball's chance in hell that would ever happen.

I don't understand your English.

I NEVER said that Reach will be graphics king,NEVER.And i have never said that Alan Wake will be either...AW is great technical accomplishment but falls shorth because of criminal resolution.If it wasnt for that it would be one of the top looking games on consoles,no doubt.

Bus-A-Bus

:lol:

Yes you did.....you most certainly did.

You even made me...er, the other guy feel bad for not giving the allocated 2 or so months of time it was to take Alan Wake to launch. You said something along the lines of "I waited for a couple years for PS3 to prove itself, the least you could do is wait a couple for months for Alan Wake to launch".

Yes....I remember it well.

Halo..I'm not 100% that it was you, but I'm almost sure you said that one too.

But most assuredly, you claimed ALAN WAKE would be a technical marvel.

I have never seen more impressive(techically) game on 360 than RDR and RE5 yet those are 720p...And BTW you ownage is not exactly ownage when its based on such a compressed old shot.Yes...I still expect Crysis 2 to be graphics king on all platforms.

Bus-A-Bus

Right...but if I recall,

You said that about Alan Wake...and then for a short time after you said that about Halo Reach....

And we both know how that turned out.

No offense, but your good will in terms of "benefit of the doubt" has now expired.

It's not reasonable for someone to claim it's constantly raining, but when we look out of the window, its a clear sunny sky blue day.

Call me when that Great Pumpkin finally arrives.