Walker34's forum posts

Avatar image for Walker34
Walker34

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#1 Walker34
Member since 2005 • 1471 Posts

[QUOTE="Walker34"]

1.It has all these things like bluray that aren't really necessary.

2.It's not like MGSIV, Killzone, Resistance, LBP and Infamous are that good

3.their own fault and not the consumers fault. To the consumer they aren't justifying the pricetag imo.

4.There is nothing the ps3 "actually does" that justifies it being more expensive.monkeyd_93

1. blu-ray= more details and information can be stored on disc than the other consoles, and its a cheaper alternative than buying a decent blu-ray outright

2. reviews beg to differ

3.they have justified the price numerous times by stating how it has a blu-ray player and top notch hardware for the our current time and the price reflects it

4. ahhh blu-ray player?

besides if you say its overpriced and sony has failed to justify its price then why did you buy it in the first place? therefore not their fault but yours.

I didnt buy it because i'm smarter than that. You guys realize the tech that is actually in these machines does not cost these companies what you think it does. A processor is a processor and is no more expensive to make than another one. The reason these companies inflate the price is because its a money maker. 2 years from now that same chip will cost $5 on ebay. Computer hardware is disposable for the most part and companies know this. The people who think the technology in the ps3 is that much more expensive to manufacture than anything else are kidding themselves.

Avatar image for Walker34
Walker34

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 Walker34
Member since 2005 • 1471 Posts

what's even funnier here is all the ps3 fanboys think i was hyping this game when i was just asking a question. insecure much?

Avatar image for Walker34
Walker34

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#3 Walker34
Member since 2005 • 1471 Posts

what do you think? are the movies we've seen the 360 version of hte game?

Avatar image for Walker34
Walker34

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#4 Walker34
Member since 2005 • 1471 Posts

Look if you are one of those who cant own a ps3 for its price then dont own it sony wont lose no crap if your not buying it KthxbaiDante_May_Die

I had both a ps3 and 360. Ultimately they cost the same. The 360 premium is 299 plus xbox live, charge kit. Or the elite its the same price. I kept hte 360 because it plays a majority of games better, has a better controller, online service and justified the pricetag moreso imo. I could care less about bluray. I want the best game console and the 360 is that. yes the 360 is also overpriced and they nickel and dime you. microsoft is just as bad but at least from a marketing perspective they are smart. they also do a better job justifying the pricetag.

Avatar image for Walker34
Walker34

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 Walker34
Member since 2005 • 1471 Posts

[QUOTE="Walker34"]

[QUOTE="whatisazerg"]

So a Ferrari (PS3) being sold at $80,000 is overpriced?

And a Ford Focus (Wii) being sold at $40,000 is not?

Hmmm.... interesting "logic".

And don't bother playing the Fanboy Card.... I own a Wii, not a PS3.

nyctota

I'm not saying it's a bad console here. I'm just it's overpriced and it is. Yes considering the market it is overpriced.

its not overpriced its expensive...

how many ferraris do you see on the street does it mean its overpriced ?

xbox live is overpriced

I agree xbox live is overpriced and a joke. I shouldn't have to pay for that. So is the ps3. Take a minivan for example. You have a family and 4 kids. You have a choice between buying a minivan or one of those huge suvs with multiple rows. i cant think of the name of it. But functionally a minivan does the same thing for half the price. The ps3 like i was saying doesnt do anything more than a 360 does. It looks shinier. As far a car you are out on the road and paying for a nice looking car. But the ps3 is actually not doing anything better than the 360 is. The 360 actually plays multiplats and most games better. It also has some very nice looking exclusives and as far as games its arguable. The 360 actually has better games and more of them imo... If the ps3 actually were better and had much beter graphics and gameplay id say otherwise but it doesnt. Thats the point and why its overpriced. I owned a ps3 and a 360 and i actually prefer the 360 and it plays a majority of games better. This is why the ps3 is overpriced. They aren't justifying the price to the consumer. If it actually played games better than yeah but it doesn't.

Yes xbox live is overpriced. The ps3 offers it for free and it does the same things pretty much. Live offers additional things that justify it somewhat but most of that stuff isnt really necessary.

The ps3 is overpriced for the same reason. Saying xbox live is overpriced and the ps3 is just expensive is completely hypocritical and you just proved my point.

At least xbox live offers a lot of different stuff. i dont think it justifies the price. The ps3 doesnt even really offer that much different and it could be argued the 360 has more games and better games and plays games better. the ps3 is overpriced.

Avatar image for Walker34
Walker34

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#6 Walker34
Member since 2005 • 1471 Posts

[QUOTE="Walker34"]

[QUOTE="Wombatringo"]Your sig is ignorant. Have you ever been to Iraq? I have, in fact, I'm here now. On topic: yes it is overpriced, for its market. Console sales show peoples reluctance to dish out 400 dollars. If the Sony brand wasn't so strong coming into this generation, the PS3 would've failed harder than it has so far. That being said, I did buy a 600 dollar release model, and I love it, but I'm not going to be ignorant and say that its not overpriced.whatisazerg

Exactly anyone who has ever taken economics 101 would know the ps3 is overpriced. Supply and demand. Who cares how much it costs to make. That's their own fault. They are charging too much for it considering how many people are buying it. The only reason they won't drop the price is because they made a mistake and they are losing money and milking every dollar they can out of it and are trying to minimumalize their losses.

So a Ferrari (PS3) being sold at $80,000 is overpriced?

And a Ford Focus (Wii) being sold at $40,000 is not?

Hmmm.... interesting "logic".

And don't bother playing the Fanboy Card.... I own a Wii, not a PS3.

I'm not saying it's a bad console here. I'm just it's overpriced and it is. Yes considering the market it is overpriced.

Avatar image for Walker34
Walker34

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 Walker34
Member since 2005 • 1471 Posts

[QUOTE="whatisazerg"]

Actually the Wii is by far, more overpriced than the PS3.

Actually the fact that Sony is losing money on each unit sold tells us that the console isn't overpriced at all, and is in fact underpriced.

Wombatringo

Your sig is ignorant. Have you ever been to Iraq? I have, in fact, I'm here now. On topic: yes it is overpriced, for its market. Console sales show peoples reluctance to dish out 400 dollars. If the Sony brand wasn't so strong coming into this generation, the PS3 would've failed harder than it has so far. That being said, I did buy a 600 dollar release model, and I love it, but I'm not going to be ignorant and say that its not overpriced.

Exactly anyone who has ever taken economics 101 would know the ps3 is overpriced. Supply and demand. Who cares how much it costs to make. That's their own fault. They are charging too much for it considering how many people are buying it. The only reason they won't drop the price is because they made a mistake and they are losing money and milking every dollar they can out of it and are trying to minimumalize their losses.

Avatar image for Walker34
Walker34

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 Walker34
Member since 2005 • 1471 Posts

Not as bad as the 3D0.Danm_999

No but it's in 2nd place to the 3do.

Avatar image for Walker34
Walker34

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 Walker34
Member since 2005 • 1471 Posts

In a recession nonetheless. It's shiny. It has all these things like bluray that aren't really necessary. Most multiplats suffer becuase not many peope own it and developers are more inclined to develop for more traditional architecture. You are paying $400 for what a handful of games? It's not like MGSIV, Killzone, Resistance, LBP and Infamous are that good and i can't get enjoyment out of games i can't play on the ps3 jsut as much if not moreso.... I can understand them charging what they do because it costs them so much to make the thing but that's their own fault and not the consumers fault. To the consumer they aren't justifying the pricetag imo. There is nothing the ps3 "actually does" that justifies it being more expensive. If it were better it would but it's not. Sony's marketing really laid an egg this gen imo and released a high tech console that noone needs.

Avatar image for Walker34
Walker34

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 Walker34
Member since 2005 • 1471 Posts

Fallout 3 is number 1. GTAIV is close behind. Infamous is good but kind of overrated by ps3 fanboys imo......

If i were to rate open world games this gen

1. Fallout 3

2. GTA IV

3. Oblivion

.

.

.

4. Infamous, Assasins creed or anything else.