[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"][QUOTE="WeAreBorn"][QUOTE="TREAL_Since"][QUOTE="Malta_1980"] Malta_1980
Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots is not in a higher place than Gears of War. It does look nice, but Gears of War looks more realistic.
No it doesn't. Where the heck have you been? Have you played both on an HDTV? And please don't compare graphics on textures alone. I have both games.
MGS4 is more impressive. Period. Play it and see for yourself. It's an amazing trechnial achievement for consoles in 2008 like gears 1 was in 2006. Lighting, animations, art direction, character models, blur, and particle/post processing effects are all better. Considering how much bigger the gameplay map/ areas are then textures are better as well.
To say Gears 1 looks more realistic is like saying an apple is a vegetable. It's just not true.
I agree with the above... and not just because am an MGS fan but cause its clear and obvious MGSIV is better overall..
also (hoping this wont offend anyone), lemmings bash PS3 for its small/poor library, yet when it comes to graphical comparisons they bring out Geow1 which is a 2006 title... doesnt that put a bad light on the 360 since it means that graphically had nothing more to offer throughout 2007 & 2008???
I think games like Bioshock & Mass Effect look great, not on Uncharted / MGSIV level but imo look better than Geow1... strange though how multiplats are the ones that look better on xbox360...
Yes, Gears of War, nearly two years old and still kicking a great deal of PlayStation 3 game's asses.
Log in to comment