I am shocked that none of the announced bundles were a Halo bundle.
Wickerman777's forum posts
Anyone with a decent education can see the value in these bundles. Problem is there are few and far smart people out there who can see this as a good deal.
Zombie: "Ps4 cause of 1080p...."
When is the last time the XB1 was sold in non-bundle form? A bundle is basically the standard console now. That's fine, but the $400 MSRP isn't going to help them when they've sold the Halo bundle for like $279-$299 for an extended period. The X1 needs to undercut the PS4 by $50-100 to be competitive, as we saw last holiday. If the X1 is $399 it will not sell relative to PS4 - regardless of what games it comes with.
I agree with you when it comes to the rest of the world. But under Spencer X1 is doing decently in NA.
Bundle announced today was pretty lame. Some Lego thing, lol. I'm expecting one of them is gonna be a Halo bundle, would be shocked if they didn't do that.
Sometimes the PS4 version dips down into high teens. Not saying that happens frequently but it happens. That's more than 4 frames.
So the rare occasion that happens should necessitate a permanent 500,000 reduction in pixels?
Not saying that. But it needs to be remedied somehow. Perhaps dynamic resolution scaling could fix it. In that instance it would drop down below 1080p only occasionally.
This game needed more fixes than MCC and doesn't even have online MP for crying out loud. Which one scored 10 and which one scored 6 again GS? :P
Well, they've already achieved critical acclaim and millions of copies sold. I suppose they could say screw patching and call it a day. Instead they continue to patch cuz they're a good company.
@Wickerman777: why sell yourself short? The resolution difference you cannot see while the frame rate will surely jump out at you.
Justin can't spot a 500,000 pixel difference but he can see brief drops of four frames.
OF COURSE
Sometimes the PS4 version dips down into high teens. Not saying that happens frequently but it happens. That's more than 4 frames.
@Wickerman777: Actually I can tell you that when I was playing it, it was more buggy than Bethesda games. Sometimes downright broken even to the extent you had to to load up an earlier save and pray the game breaking glitch won't repeat itself.
Well, you're the first I've heard say it's that bad.
Good that they're still fixing it but Witcher 3 has gazillion other broken things that cannot be fixed by mere patches.
I haven't played any game this size that doesn't have bugs. It comes with the territory. I doubt it's as buggy as Bethesda's stuff.
Glad to see that they're working on PS4's framerate issue. I'm still undecided about which platform I want to get it for. I'd prefer to get it for PS4 because of the better resolution but they need to get the framerate as good as the X1 version or I'm going with the X1 version.
If they fix the frame problem so many will look mighty stupid,after all they have use this game to claim the PS4 is CPU bound..lol
Lol, this again. Nobody said the game is "CPU bound." Just that the most likely culprit is the CPU because it runs better on a PC with a 7850 in it, the same power as the PS4's GPU, than it does on PS4. But the PC doesn't have a crappy tablet-class CPU in it like the PS4 does trying to keep pace with a 1080p open-world game. You're gonna feel pretty foolish if they come right out and say it's the CPU.
Good that they're still fixing it but Witcher 3 has gazillion other broken things that cannot be fixed by mere patches.
I haven't played any game this size that doesn't have bugs. It comes with the territory. I doubt it's as buggy as Bethesda's stuff.
Glad to see that they're working on PS4's framerate issue. I'm still undecided about which platform I want to get it for. I'd prefer to get it for PS4 because of the better resolution but they need to get the framerate as good as the X1 version or I'm going with the X1 version.
I don't really care about that particular bundle but I think I heard they've got more to announce yet.
I believe we should do what Greece did and employ lots of people on government programs thus providing them with excellent wages, pensions, and other full benefits. Could raise the minimum wage to 40-50$/hour to help those make up the difference. It's total bullshit to say that jobs like mcDonald's, Wendy's, Burger king, etc. should be considered starter jobs. If we didnt have people working those jobs, how could you feed your obesity?
OK, I know this reply was written in jest but I don't like that last line (And no, I'm not fat. Very much the opposite. So this is not an "I'm offended" thing). People railing on about cheap, high calorie food bug me cuz really it's an elitist thing. What's the alternative to consuming high calorie food for a decent price? Having to eat mounds of low calorie food for huge sums of money, that's what. If ya wanna eat nothing but nuts and veggies then you're gonna have to spend all damned day eating cuz your body does need around 2000 calories a day and it takes a lot of that stuff to get there. And you're gonna break your bank account doing it. And the obesity problem that the western world is facing right now is not because of fast food and junk food. Seriously, those things existed for decades before this was a big problem. The reason for it is lack of exercise. People spending lots of time on their phones, on their PC, playing video games, etc. Tech is making us fat, not McDonald's.
Log in to comment