Hm, does anyone remember all those threads/posts about history repeating itself, a few months ago in SW? I remember two reasons why people said the PS3 will fail: 1. The console with the best hardware always lost (nevermind the fact that people now say the 360's is stronger). 2. Every brand who has ruled the market for 2 generation lost the 3rd (Nintendo as a prime example). Well, here's one to support Sony: All of Sony's consoles had the worst first-months sales. That includes the PS3 (as a person here stated the 360 had better sales). So if history repeats itself, and Sony continues with the tradition of selling horribly at first, PS3 might be the winner once again.
 Technically, I think all gens had vastly improved graphics over the ones before, so he's kinda right. Some of the gens were even called 32/64 bit era, 8 bit era etc. instead of 4th gen or 5th gen, to symbolize the raise in graphic power.
EDIT: Removed the quotes to not get modded, I don't have the energy to quote the exact number allowed. You probably know who this post is for.Â
Don't you mean first handheld to touch Nintendo? Of course PSP didn't have a chance against that GB, but that's because it wasn't there. :P Anyway, so what if there's a price drop? Do you prefer it to stay more expensive and lose even more? I don't understand the logic of some of these "damage control" threads. Everything has to do with business, and so does the PSP's pricedrop.
But everything looks 3,000,000 times better on the PS3 than the 360, meaning none of them are the worst. You completely and utterly missed the ENTIRE point.
Sheesh Kalel, I've never seen someone so defensive about his own poll results so fast. I chose single player too, because I'm too lazy to read books and I actually play for storylines too.
Seems like every game with perfect graphics, storyline and gameplay is drawn back by sound/replayability. Sound is a really irritating score which always takes every game's score back.
Log in to comment