Hm. I guess that will hurt Sony even further in the future. Other games I found to have PS2 & Next gen ports but no PS3 ports are UEFA CL 2006-2007, Samurai Warriors 2 Empires, BT2, and that's only from a brief look in the main PS2 page. I shall leave you to ponder on this while I sleep. Good night.
[QUOTE="Xolver"]What's up with that?metalmonkey268
WHAT'S UP WITH ALL THE GOD DAMN QUESTIONS? What's up with the temper? :O I'm sure Betheasda could do it. :p I'll just feed you up until you explode, and wait for the next person to respond about the ease of development. :o
Then why not make a version for the PSX? Nah, just kidding. xD Still, any word of the PS3's game development "ease"? Going back to Oblivion, it's a game that people are bound to buy, yet it wasn't released on launch day and STILL not released today, even though it's quite old. What's up with that?
I'd vote KOTOR, but I personally don't consider it console RPG, mainly because then you can call any game on a console a "console RPG", even if it's also a PC game, so you'd need to add TES at least. I will refrain from voting, then.
[QUOTE="Xolver"]But the PS3 is a system that is still on the rise (or at least trying to be), and Xbox is dead. Of course a system can't succeed without games, that's why devs make games for new systems.metalmonkey268
There's no reason for a PS3 version, if the PS3 users want to play it they buy the PS2 version.
They made that decision because it would have cost them more money to make a version for the PS3 and PS2, but they don't.
If the Xbox was still around and the 360 was more b/c with it, you'd see an Xbox version. Don't the 360 and Wii have backwards compatibility? Also note both the GC and the Wii have their own versions.
Personally I could care less about this game-L-U-I-S-
....... Before I comment on that, I have to ask. Where does "COULD care less" come from? It means your level of careness can actually be the highest. That phrase just doesn't say anything. Now, to actually reply, so what if you couldn't care less? I'm talking generally, and I made it quite clear. I even gave a more common game, Oblivion, but you had to do the fanboyish thing and go pro-Sony in an argument that isn't even against Sony. Go on, add another "*insert Sony product here* OWNER" to your sig and come back when you have something more fruitful to say.
It's not on the PS3 for the same reason it's not on the Xbox. Not enough reason to. metalmonkey268
... But the PS3 is a system that is still on the rise (or at least trying to be), and Xbox is dead. Of course a system can't succeed without games, that's why devs make games for new systems.
Log in to comment