Xolver's forum posts

Avatar image for Xolver
Xolver

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Xolver
Member since 2005 • 2052 Posts
Microsoft IS milking money. Just read the system requirements of Halo 2 for the PC. You simply CAN NOT deny it.
Avatar image for Xolver
Xolver

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Xolver
Member since 2005 • 2052 Posts
As a person who already played 2 SvR games before, I think what they did with the taunts was fake. I mean, sure, maybe a movement is needed to initiate it (doubtful here too, how would forward taunts not be read as punches?), but there is no way after you start the taunt you need to continue moving in accordance, like the funny person on the right did.
Avatar image for Xolver
Xolver

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Xolver
Member since 2005 • 2052 Posts
Uh, if most of them never used an X360, and just want to bash it, wouldn't they pick the 3rd option? The 2nd option is very close to the 1st option's result, and you have to consider at least SOME of the 3rd option's votes were true. Hence, it does have more than 50% failure rate for the people who took the poll.
Avatar image for Xolver
Xolver

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Xolver
Member since 2005 • 2052 Posts
Hey viper, are you 11 or something? Stop bashing the PS3 like a little boy. At least make some plausible claims.
Avatar image for Xolver
Xolver

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Xolver
Member since 2005 • 2052 Posts
Oh, stop saying how wrong it would be to have the twin towers in the game. Why is it okay to shoot in the game but not have/destroy the twin towers? Because that was a real event with real deaths? And what, no one ever died from a bullet, a car, a rocket, a plane, a *insert original way of killing in GTA games*?
Avatar image for Xolver
Xolver

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Xolver
Member since 2005 • 2052 Posts
[QUOTE="Xolver"]Regardless of the smartness-overflow that comes from the TC, you people need to stop posting this picture. Firstly, it honestly looks bad. Sure, the close up of Mario looks good, but other than that everything doesn't. Look at the lava. Look at the two... Buttons? Platforms? or whatever it is on the lava. The volcano looks like Photoshop's liquid effect. Nothing to it. As for first gen PS2 games that look better than that, I'm pretty sure SSX Tricky does, but I'm not sure as I haven't played/looked at it for quite a while. Can't be bothered to look for a screeny at the moment.Hyper-Chicken
:| You acually think SSX Tricky looks better than SMG...okaaay. You're either 1) A Troll 2) A Fanboy 3) Blind 4) Incredibly stupid.

So you had to ignore my whole post and the fact I said I'm not sure because I haven't looked at it for a long time and just call me stupid? GJ. G-Man, okay, no game looks as good in pics as it does real-time. I'm just saying that picture literally looks ugly, there are literally no details outside of Mario's character itself. Go ahead and post the trailer to own people who compare Wii to 6th/5th gen consoles.
Avatar image for Xolver
Xolver

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Xolver
Member since 2005 • 2052 Posts

[QUOTE="Xolver"] Regardless of the smartness-overflow that comes from the TC, you people need to stop posting this picture. Firstly, it honestly looks bad. Sure, the close up of Mario looks good, but other than that everything doesn't. Look at the lava. Look at the two... Buttons? Platforms? or whatever it is on the lava. The volcano looks like Photoshop's liquid effect. Nothing to it. As for first gen PS2 games that look better than that, I'm pretty sure SSX Tricky does, but I'm not sure as I haven't played/looked at it for quite a while. Can't be bothered to look for a screeny at the moment.-The-G-Man-

Would you prefer it if I used these?

Yeah, I'd prefer if you used the 2nd picture in that post, because the 1st one doesn't look that good either.
Avatar image for Xolver
Xolver

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Xolver
Member since 2005 • 2052 Posts

Yeah, I know. That looks JUST like Super Mario 64. It's disgusting.

-The-G-Man-
Regardless of the smartness-overflow that comes from the TC, you people need to stop posting this picture. Firstly, it honestly looks bad. Sure, the close up of Mario looks good, but other than that everything doesn't. Look at the lava. Look at the two... Buttons? Platforms? or whatever it is on the lava. The volcano looks like Photoshop's liquid effect. Nothing to it. As for first gen PS2 games that look better than that, I'm pretty sure SSX Tricky does, but I'm not sure as I haven't played/looked at it for quite a while. Can't be bothered to look for a screeny at the moment.
Avatar image for Xolver
Xolver

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Xolver
Member since 2005 • 2052 Posts
Server died or maybe really April Fools?
Avatar image for Xolver
Xolver

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Xolver
Member since 2005 • 2052 Posts

The one thing which is worse than a person who got self-owned, is a person who got self-owned and doesn't admit it, and instead tries to bore the opposition out of the thread.

Good fail.

Oh, and if I happen to have any grammatical errors in my post, responding to that would be dumb as I'm not from an English-speaking country.