@arsalan1816 BF will be played at 30FPS on consoles. The graphics will be rendered in 720P, and upscaled to 1080P if your playing on HD. For PC, you can get 60FPS will full 1080P rendering. (Pretty much meaning, get it for console unless you have a good PC to play it)

What are you talking about noobzoer? Have you even played any BF games? You are more immersed in your environment in any BF game. In CoD you just run around shooting. You need very little strategy. You must not know the definition of realism in a Simulation game if you judge everything from CoD. Having played both games, that's my opinion. If you think otherwise, fine by you, but you really shouldn't make any argument without evidence to back it up. BF3 incorporates a variety of realistic gameplay elements not even in the CoD franchise. I would be niave to say BF3 is a 100% depiction of Real War. i'm not that stupid. But for simulations, it's the most realistic out there. Period.

BF3 is a Realistic First Person Shooter. CoD is the fun arcade style First Person Shooter with some realism. Its that simple, Fanboys of each don't complain thats the cold hard truth. I personally like the realism of BF. I tried playing CoD MP and its way to arcade style for my taste. Throw knifes from halfway across the map, people spamming nades, 360/720 spinning headshots...Its not my kind of game. Shooting a tank at a building and seeing campers get crushed to death is so much more enjoyable to me personally. Thats My Opinion. (Note: There was a time when CoD was considered 'The' Realistic War Simulation, but that time has come and gone. It still shares realistic aspects of war, but its now turned into an arcade style of gameplay. The BF franchise has pushed realism far beyond any other War Simulation out their.)