@off3nc3: my favorite game which i have bought digitally on PC, PS3, PS4, xb360 and XB1 is done?
I admit that i don't play last gen anymore since they got ported to current gen, and i prefer the console gameplay to that of pc, but I do play Diablo 3 daily on both Xb1 and Ps4 as do friends of mine. This game is far from "done."
@lanmode4ever: Yeah, but how close do you sit to that tv...generally, you buy a tv to an appropriate viewing distance...ie smaller room, smaller tv/larger room, larger tv...of course if you are really close to a tv you will notice a difference, hence why pc monitors have higher resolution; the view screen is right in front of one's face.
@lulababy: the irony here is that a craptacular 480p image on a tube tv looked more photoreal on a dvd movie than anything even at 4k looks in a video game.
@effec_tor: 1997 was so 1024x768 on a CRT...with really bad graphics...load up jedi knight and tell me that it looks anything near what we see in our games today....i get your point but, it's more of a hyperbole than a realistic one.
I have both. I played both on xbox one and i like the feel of project cars, -engine sounds are amazing, but the steering on project cars was terrible. It had a severe understeer and then there would be a frame jump and you'd oversteer off the track. So as much as i want to like project cars more, forza is more playable.
It is not a refutable fact. Technically superior? Forza is open world; Drive Club is not. Which game has farther view distance, more objects on screen, more destructible environments, better looking cars, more cars on screen at once, cosmetic damage to vehicles and environment. "Tecnically superior" does not just refer graphical fidelity in a closed environment.
Zzshock's comments