HackerSP I think GameSpot must have put some pics in the wrong spot because the PS3 is way more powerful and better looking then the Xbox it a mistake everyone makes it i guess the names must have been change in the office by someone ****************************************************************** Wow! More damage control and fanboy denial. Didn't IGN do this same kind of comparison and the results were pretty much the same. lol!! The 360 has the better graphics card and the PS3 has the better Blu-Ray player. lol!! Nuff said.

Lil_villain2kg all i have to say is MGS4...360 cant run it or graphically handle it. WAR = OVER **************************************************************** Yeah it can. A PC could run it easily and wouldn't even need Blu-Ray. Load the whole game onto a PC HDD and it'll run better then the PS3. The Blu-Ray disc couldn't even hold all the data that was suppose to go into MGS4. They wanted to put more content in MGS4, but ran out of space. lol!!

Check the 5th and 6th picture down the list on the GTA IV pictures. Please someone tell me why the PS3 verison is so damn jaggy. Look at the cab and the grey truck behind it. Also the PS3's lighting it way off. Too much yellow lighting. Looks really bad. I thought these games looked exactly the same. What a mess. ********************************************************************* lewis2112 lol they should compare these games to the pc counterparts nad then see the real difference. its all about the games not hte consoles ------------------------------------------------------------------ The PC is not a game console, so you can't compare it. You may say , "Why not." Because PC's all have different graphic cards in it and different components. It's not a stagnant hardware like a game console. PC's innards are consistantly changing. The same can't be said for game consoles. If anything the PC version should be compared to a MAC version. PC's evovle every 3-6 months. Consoles don't. Hence you can't compare the games against each other.

1337kyosanim clearly the only reason gamespot releases these graphics comparisons is because they love all of the crap it stirs up on the comments...who gives a crap about which one looks better? ****************************************************** All the cows and lemmings graphic whores who post graphic comparisons on the forums every 2 hrs. That's who cares. 50% of the forum are gamers screaming about how much Killzone 2 lots better then Gears of Wars 2 or GT5: P looks better then Forza 2 & PGR4. That's all they talk about. Anyways, the XBox 360 version of Assassin's Creed looks better in this comparison. Both games still look great and as long as you have fun playing them, the graphics aren't a big deal.

Well, my PC doesn't have the maximum requirement to play Bioshock like it should, so I'll stick to the plug and play XBox 360 version. If you're a hardcore PC gamer with the hardware to play Bioshock like it should, then get the PC version. If you're a true console gamer, don't have a high-end PC and don't want to upgrade just for one game, get the XBox 360 version. It's that simple. Just get the game.

European gamers are getting screwed. They are paying about $150-$200 more for the PS3 and it has less hardware components in it and less B/C. That's just wrong. Europeans should really boycott the PS3 until Sony fixes this issue.

The delay and shortages don't bother me much. If I get a PS3, great. I can sell it on Ebay for $1000 or more. If I don't, I'll get the Wii before the end of the year. There is nothing decent coming out for the PS3 until the summer of 07 anyways. I'm not exactly sure why everyone is rushing out to buy one anyways. I could see if DMC4, FFXIII, MGS4, Heavenly Sword or even Naughty Dog's game were launch titles, but they aren't. By next year, hopefully all the bugs and defects will be removed. Europeans have always had to wait for new systems to come to their country. Nothing has changed. They aren't going to miss much.