@spiegel1: "The ending of ME 3 was mediocre. Nothing more and nothing less."

No, ME3 is mediocre until the ending and then goes full retard. Ride to hell has a more logical story than ME3, that says a lot...

"The rest of the story though was good."

Are you talking about the "dildo" plot?

"Especially if you were playing Renegade Shepard. By that point, Shepard was Saren. And on the whole I'd say it's as good as ME 1."

You did not saw of Renegade Shepard does to Saren in ME1 did you? But I´ll admit that it´s worse for a Paragon Shepard. To see a hero becoming a villain was painful, I'm still "depressed" by those events...

@Pooya1881: "almost everybody who was important from ME3 has left Bioware. its not the same team, its also a new studio, and its first game, Bioware Montreal i believe."

You have the most important piece of crap of ME3 in Andromeda... Mac Walters. Also Casey Hudson was there almost all the development time. The two masterminds of ME3. The artists...

"replying based on impulses does not work in ur favor cuz, impulses r not very logical"

I never look to the avatar of the people who makes a statement. I see what they wrote and if I disagree I reply. Impulses may not be the logical approach, but it is by far the most honest. But I´ll admit that ME3 truly gets in my nerves...

@killercondoms: "Yes they messed up the ending but again they admitted it was a mistake and apologized for it..."

Since when "it's our artistic view" is an apologize?

I will not attack Andromeda yet... But animations are always the lesser of my problems. Story... well, that´s another matter.

@Daian: "but everything else was fine"

Like the giant dildo as the main plot?

Or like the depressed Shepard?

Or like the voyeur Shepard?

"the characters are lifeless"

James Vega?

Diana Allers?

Admiral Steven Hackett?

Kai Leng?

...

You got my point...

@Daian: "The others did not have these problems so no, it's not what one expects from Bioware."

Did you missed ME3?

@zerohournow: Games are made for gamers. Gamers buy games. If some type of games are not bought, the end result is the non manufacturing of such games. So..."blame consumers" is not as illogical as you are trying to defend.

@jezz555: And that is a surprise after their reply to ME3 backlasch?

@spiegel1: "ME: A is as good as ME 1&3."

Now you lost me. Good as ME1 and ME2 aka Masterpiece... or... Good as ME3 aka pile of crap...

@Pooya1881: "we did discuss it for a week man"

I never pay attention to the debates I have. My replies are based on impulses. Especially when the theme is ME.

"as a fan i see that they try and deliver what fans want on some fronts"

I respect but strongly disagree. I can't avoid to reply... sorry. :)

"i have serious doubts about this ME dev team."

The most important part of the team is the same as ME3 so... no surprises here.

"DA team is way better than they are..."

DA team it's not shining also. But I also think is easiest to make a DA game than a ME game.

@rmokeefe76: "Because he said it. I'm assuming he beileves in what he is saying because he said it, lol."

Well... Maybe it's my English that it´s bad... English is not my mother language but... If that is so why the "Bias"? It's just his opinion, and that´s it...

"a site who retains you for a position"

Sorry but I do not understand what you mean... Are you not free to give your opinion?

"For instance, he would never say "oh man, Gamespot is wrong and way off - this game is a 10!" Even if he "believed" it. If he did, no more moderator status, guaranteed. That's why the credibility is lessened."

Put yourself in his shoes. If you were a moderator who is not obliged to make a comment... Why would you comment to say something you don´t believe? Do you understand what I mean?