okay so if eyetoy is like NATAL no controller just body why make MOVE why just not make Eye toy 2 Natal will dominate if they did eye toy 2 it wont

gugler990

You know Move uses the PSeye, right?

[QUOTE="MortalDecay"]Wow... A lot of people are lost... To say Natal is a copy of Eyetoy is just..... Wrong. If Natal is a copy of the Eyetoy/PSEye, why would Sony need Move? Why not just stick with the PSEye, if it's just like Natal? :lol: Think about it, instead of being too proud of a fanboy to admit Natal is innovative.NukePistols

Ownage?

both games are equally as good except uncharted 2 is better

[QUOTE="caligamer"]

[QUOTE="tok1879"] I missed that. 360 outsold PS3?

tok1879

That guy needs to get his facts straight....cause PS3 easily beat 360 in Nov. sales

I dunno wherehe got his"recent news" from lol

if it actually did thats really surprising even professional analysts thought ps3 outsold 360

Here are Pachter's November hardware sales predictions:

Wedbush Morgan:

Wii - 1,050,000
PS3 - 700,000
Xbox 360 - 650,000
PS2 - 175,000
PSP - 290,000
DS - 1,535,000

Electronic Entertainment Design and Research (EEDAR) analyst Jesse Divnich also passed along his NPD November forecast for comparison. Divnich is expecting higher Wii console sales, with the gap between PS3 and Xbox 360 to be closer.

EEDAR

Wii - 1,200,000
PS3 - 725,000
Xbox 360 - 700,000
PS2 - 200,000
PSP - 270,000
DS - 1,580,000

[QUOTE="caligamer"]

[QUOTE="tok1879"] I missed that. 360 outsold PS3?

sensfanVone

That guy needs to get his facts straight....cause PS3 easily beat 360 in Nov. sales

I dunno wherehe got his"recent news" from lol

Umm... no the PS3 didn't beat the 360 in sales this has already been established as fact.

You may have missed that, if so it's all good.

Already been established? By WHO?

If you go look at www.vgchartz.com ps3 has outsold the 360 for last 5 weeks (i didnt check further back than 5 weeks)

[QUOTE="mythrol"][QUOTE="tok1879"] So now that they're at the same price, who's ripping people off now? Who offers the better package?tok1879

That guy needs to get his facts straight....cause PS3 easily beat 360 in Nov. sales

I dunno wherehe got his"recent news" from lol

[QUOTE="caligamer"]

[QUOTE="mythrol"]

This is not the thread to discuss this. But to answer your question, Did MSFT's property HDD or Wireless adapter FORCE the original price to $599??? No.

The difference is MSFT gave the option for the HDD and wifi adapter (yes, they're expensive but not NEEDED to play games on the 360). Sony on the other hand FORCED the cell processor and Blu-Ray on us with blind promises of "4D, 1080p 120fps." And All we got instead were mandatory installs due to the Blu-Ray drive being SLOWER than DVD9's and an extremely high price point.

mythrol

first of all how is 1080p a blind promise lol....i personally have never of 4D from any company, but SONY is releasing 3D games next year along with 3D tvs

I think all those things that sony added was for the 'betterment' of gaming

Sony invested millions of dollars in blu-ray and it a risk that didnt have a garenteed victory of blu-ray....SONY pushed the limits of gaming by adding a bigger HDD, bluray, and wifi adapter...while microsoft just kept the 360 to the basics so they could release it ahead of sony and make more profit, that shows how microsoft is the more profit driven company and not sony

even Nintendo did something different this generation with the Wii, the 360 took the smallest risk out of all 3 systems

AND next generation im pretty sure microsoft will have bluetooth, built in wifi,bigger HDD and maybe blu-ray because of PS3 making it the standard this gen.

thats all you have to say b/c you know im right

SONY was losing the most from each console made....it was around $800 to make it and they were selling for $600

Any new technology has a really high development cost it takes time for the price to go down, at least Sony added some new technology this generation while 360 stuck to the basics

[QUOTE="caligamer"]

WOW i think you got it a little mixed up...all companies that try to profit and force there products down consumers throats but MICROSOFT not sony is the best example of this...quick exmaple is how you can use ANY bluetooth headset with the PS3 or ANY 2.5inch hard drive but with xbox 360 you have to buy the microsoft headset and the microsoft hard drive and the microsoft wireless adapter...your reason for being a lemming doesnt really make sencemythrol

This is not the thread to discuss this. But to answer your question, Did MSFT's property HDD or Wireless adapter FORCE the original price to $599??? No.

The difference is MSFT gave the option for the HDD and wifi adapter (yes, they're expensive but not NEEDED to play games on the 360). Sony on the other hand FORCED the cell processor and Blu-Ray on us with blind promises of "4D, 1080p 120fps." And All we got instead were mandatory installs due to the Blu-Ray drive being SLOWER than DVD9's and an extremely high price point.

first of all how is 1080p a blind promise lol....i personally have never of 4D from any company, but SONY is releasing 3D games next year along with 3D tvs

I think all those things that sony added was for the 'betterment' of gaming

Sony invested millions of dollars in blu-ray and it a risk that didnt have a garenteed victory of blu-ray....SONY pushed the limits of gaming by adding a bigger HDD, bluray, and wifi adapter...while microsoft just kept the 360 to the basics so they could release it ahead of sony and make more profit, that shows how microsoft is the more profit driven company and not sony

even Nintendo did something different this generation with the Wii, the 360 took the smallest risk out of all 3 systems

AND next generation im pretty sure microsoft will have bluetooth, built in wifi,bigger HDD and maybe blu-ray because of PS3 making it the standard this gen.

[QUOTE="roddollente"]

[QUOTE="mythrol"]Because the control scheme is the same it's a rip off? It looks like it tells a completely different story, from a completely new angle. That would be like saying Borderlands is a rip off of MW2 because it has the same control scheme.mythrol

how would you know when you're a lemming? you havent played any God of War game i presume?

like i said, it's a TOTAL rip-off. where can you see another third-person action game that has controls like God of War, in the 5 years of its existence? NOWHERE. i can forgive the Square is light attacks, Triangle is the heavy attacks. but to roll with the right analog stick? and the fixed camera angle? those are all in God of War. you can search all you want but you wont find a similar game with similar controls. and not jsut the controls. the overall game.

like when you kill enemies they give you orbs where you can upgrade your attacks. aaaand, when an enemy is down you press a button to do an animation that'll rip the enemy's limbs. also, you gain your health and mana, not from chests, but from fountains. and gues where the setting is? Hell. oh yeah. it just reeks of God of War. the set pieces and everything. the Scythe was totally the Blades. like how both of them make giants swings and can extend with chains or what-have-yous. totally. the only thing that differs from GoW is that when an enemy is weaken you can either Absolve or Punish them, but it is totally like inFamous. lulz.

i've had high expectations for this game 'cause it's coming from Visceral who made Dead Space, which is far from a clone. it was totally original with everything. but then you got this. wtf.

WOW i think you got it a little mixed up...all companies that try to profit and force there products down consumers throats but MICROSOFT not sony is the best example of this...quick exmaple is how you can use ANY bluetooth headset with the PS3 or ANY 2.5inch hard drive but with xbox 360 you have to buy the microsoft headset and the microsoft hard drive and the microsoft wireless adapter...your reason for being a lemming doesnt really make sence

[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]So if it plays exactly like GoWIII it should be fun right? skinny_man_69

It doesnt mean the rip off game is garbage...but think about if 50 ofther games came out almost exactly the same as god of war or halo, they would be 'good' games because they copied a great game but they would lack originality