@Gelugon_baat: He says he was glad it reviewed poorly, meaning he wanted that just because of its content. Nobody wants a game to be badly review because it has bad mechanics bc then it is going to be badly reviewed for sure, so there is no need to wish. You also don't wish for it to be badly reviewed for mechanics unless you like seeing others fail. That's how I know.
@CieloPerso: you don't want to rehash yet you post how curious.
more of a game than a lot of phone "games".
yeah we should ban anything that is offensive, bc if it is, it doesn't happen in the real world, so it has no place on media, especially not in games.
wait, let me just kill thousand of soldiers in Just Cause 3, that were prob forced to be soldiers by their dictator.
i know i know lets make a game about bullying (Buly - RockStar), bc kids aren't going to play it and copy it.
BTW I refuse to ever play Bully or give it my money. Yet i don't want them to ban the game, bc i have no need to affirm my morals by forcing them on others.
Anyway censor and ban everything that might offend.
"Hatred is too repetitive to be exciting, too dumb to be frightening, too basic for you to feel accomplished at its end, too dour to be violently cathartic, too self-serious to engender ironic amusement, and yet still too childish to matter."
This review is WAY WAY too biased to be relevant, too worried about making pretty witty comments about the game to actually review it.
Nobody really cared about Cindy, except some really prude journalists. It was not a drama, stop making stuff up to fit some agenda.
Oh and the same journalist made Dead or Alive not come to the West, so they are clearly winning. Never thought journalists would enjoy censorship, hope it doesn't back fire in their faces.
chad28_69's comments