coolviper2003's forum posts

Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts

I have a Wii and MP3,.. just got the ice missles. It's a good way to play. But, I don't see it performing industry wide changes to how FPS are played.Demetri_OS

Well considering the only thing that Wii-mote is actually changing is how you aim, it shouldn't be drasticly different then using a standard control. I mean you still use an analog stick to move around, you still press buttons to jump and shoot. It's just you now have pinpoint accuracy aiming. If you didn't think the aiming was easy in that game then I really don't know what to tell you.....

Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts
[QUOTE="legend26"][QUOTE="Demetri_OS"][QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]MOH:H2 -- Read the IGN Review. "Better controls than MP3"

"controls that spank anything that uses dual analog". They even said that the controls are the best they've seen on a home console, pc is a different story however.
Demetri_OS
And how will it do when compared to sales of Halo 3?

wait so now lemmings hype sales???

Nope. Sheep said sales result in victory. So, if the wiimote is the only way a FPS should be played, then how is Halo 3 doing just fine? And every other FPS? Plus, I do not see developers saying they would love the wiimote set up for their FPS.

Maybe because Xbox fanboys are forced to play with analog sticks. Of course it's going to sell well regardless of what controls are being used. You should really play MP3 and see for yourself how much easier aiming can be as opposed to analog sticks.
Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts
If you have some sort of graphics card in your computer that is capable of running current games on at least low settings, and youplay PC games that you have to pay money for. Playing Minesweeper doesn't make you one ;)
Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts

[QUOTE="coolviper2003"]Too bad it can't run games. You need a motherboard, ram, cpu, hard drive, optical drive, power supply, OS, and a case for that 8800 GT to play anything.BitterExtract

Your going on the internet on a what then?

A console? Disgusting... :?

Web browsers on consoles are disgusting. But let me ask you this. What if I'm surfing the internet on a 1.6 ghz P4 with 256 mb's of sdram,a 40 gb IDE hard drive, and a 200 watt power supply? Please don't tell me the 8800 GT would work on my setup.
Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts
Too bad it can't run games. You need a motherboard, ram, cpu, hard drive, optical drive, power supply, OS, and a case for that 8800 GT to play anything.
Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts
This doesn't effect the PS3 in any way. Why do fanboys try to spin this as a horrible thing. The cell was outsourced so Sony can spend more money on other things. The cell is still in production people. :roll:
Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts

[QUOTE="Homesrfan"]

Take off the fanboy glasses.

See how nice it looks now?

Willy105

But those screens are in the actual resolution the Wii outputs it.

It will not look like that anywhere else.

The Wii outpust games at 852x480. No reviewer has complained about jaggies or anything like that, some have even said it looks great on a HDTV.

Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts
I thought the graphics looked really good. What was so bad about them technically? I thought the models looked really good, the textures were well done, I mean they had shaders implemented in just about every texture. Not to mention normal mapping, fur shaders, amazing looking water. Again, what was technically wrong with them. Could you see jaggies or low polygon models? Did you see bad texture work? Explain.
Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts

When motion sensing is all the system has going for it then of course it sucks when you realise it isn't anything special. Many of us have been there.

RAW power + normal controller gives you more than a fancy controller and last-gen tech, unless you have low standards.

tomarlyn
Yeah, games with last gen graphics can't be fun anymore huh? :roll: I mean who would want to play SMG or MP3, or Zelda TP? They look so dated compared to Lair or Ratchet and Clank, I mean we all know better graphics make a better game, right?I remember when gaming just used to be about having fun, now games need production values and have to sport all of these new graphical bells and whistles to even get noticed.