da_iceman017's forum posts

Avatar image for da_iceman017
da_iceman017

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 da_iceman017
Member since 2008 • 120 Posts

Artistic graphics king is between Uncharted: Drakes Fortune, PoP, and Valkyria Chronicles.

Avatar image for da_iceman017
da_iceman017

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 da_iceman017
Member since 2008 • 120 Posts

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="Rhubarb9"]

why can't FF games feature more manly guys like Kratos and less Noctis and Vaan types?

Rhubarb9

Because they are actually good games.



so gears of war is bad ok

Gears is great all around except for usual lag online.

Avatar image for da_iceman017
da_iceman017

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 da_iceman017
Member since 2008 • 120 Posts

Stoop bashing Killzone 2 unless you have finished the campaign start to finish and have unlocked the general class online.

Avatar image for da_iceman017
da_iceman017

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 da_iceman017
Member since 2008 • 120 Posts
Just a side note to a previous post ... RE5 doesn't look that great. Other than the character models including the zombies and cutscenes, most textures are flat and low res. KZ2 might have some low res textures but non are flat except for maybe the floor in some corners. RE5 is alot like MGS4, character models are top notch but textures arent that great. RE5 is slightly better looking than MGS4 in some areas. KZ2 is hands down the best looking game on consoles. PS - Sony just has more time and resources to make a game like KZ2. The good thing is that KZ2 is a 1st party game so they can show there engine to other 1st party developing teams. PS3 games will just keep on getting better. Nonstop-Madness
MGS4 = 768p>>>RE5 = 720p
Avatar image for da_iceman017
da_iceman017

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 da_iceman017
Member since 2008 • 120 Posts

The reason is that owners ofboth consoles wants to have the better console. One wants superiority because of an insecurity that they have a slightly inferior console while the other wants superiority because of an insucurity that they may not have gotten an equavilent machine for the sticker price paid.

Avatar image for da_iceman017
da_iceman017

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 da_iceman017
Member since 2008 • 120 Posts
[QUOTE="DonMarkito"]

[QUOTE="patriots7672"]

Everyone knows PS3>>>>360.

Yeah, that's exactly why the PS3 sells more than the 360:lol:

Just becuse a toyta sells more than the ferrari that means its better. Also the wii sells more than the xbox and ps3 combined so it's better. These statements are all correct by your logic.
Avatar image for da_iceman017
da_iceman017

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 da_iceman017
Member since 2008 • 120 Posts
[QUOTE="Steppy_76"]

[QUOTE="Trinners"]

[QUOTE="Steppy_76"]The absense of something does NOT prove it doesn't exist, especially when we have evidence of games that DO appear on both platforms performing near identically on both. There isn't anything to prove anyway, because the ONLY thing offered is the sujective opinion that KZ2 has the best graphics. Until we have objective reasonings to support that KZ2 is indeed the best, there is nothing to disprove. How about presenting an argument first. The first person saying KZ2 is the best has no more validity than the person who responds "no it isn't".

Here you go. Digital Foundry, a company that makes video capture hardware, says that Killzone 2 is graphically the undisputed winner.

And about that "The absense of something does NOT prove it doesn't exist." You can't claim that the 360 is better graphically because you have zero supporting evidence of it while the PS3 does (KZ2).

And no you're right the absence of evidence doesn't mean the games don't exist, but then again you don't have any evidence that they do either. so for now we assume they don't exist until you can provide evidence that they do. That's the way it works in every judicial court on the planet.

Except for the fact that the only evidence to support KZ2 being the best that has been offered amounts to nothing more than circumstantial evidence. It hasn't been proved impossible OR possible yet, that is the point. I can counter that Gears of War and Halo are impossible on the PS3, since we don't need any sort of objective evidence to support claims we make. Also, how exactly is a company that makes capture cards proof? Man, I wish people on here would learn what does and what doesn't lend credence to a claim. The ONLY way to prove or disprove the topic without an attempt being made is to find something killzone 2 does(ie poly count, shader instructions, model count, texture resolution....etc etc etc)at a level the 360 hardware can not achieve. Anything else said on either side is absolute speculation.

True.
Avatar image for da_iceman017
da_iceman017

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 da_iceman017
Member since 2008 • 120 Posts
[QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

[QUOTE="da_iceman017"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

Again, list those games

MLB 09: The Show, Wipeout HD, NBA 09: The Inside, Gran Turismo 5: Prolouge just to name a few.

So just a couple of sports games and some PSN games?

Do you know why those are the only type of games that do 1080p native?

Yes, I do know why and that's because these types of games don't have to render many things such as particle physics and such but the point remains we have yet to see anything comparable on the 360 in terms of native res. or framerate.
Avatar image for da_iceman017
da_iceman017

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 da_iceman017
Member since 2008 • 120 Posts
[QUOTE="tatorzone09"][QUOTE="da_iceman017"]

The real question still remains and that is have any retail game on the 360 reached NATIVE 1080p graphics at 60fps? The answer is no while the ps3 has many times. An example of this is MLB 09: The Show. This doesn't prove superiority but many developers have stated that there respective projects were only possible on the ps3(examples: Flower, Killzone 2 ,MGS4 and Gran Turismo) while this has hardly ever been said about titles exclusive to the xbox.The facts are that the gpu is equal on both with the exception of better texturinng and anti-aliasing on the 360 andd that the ps3 has a superior cpu(examples:http://kotaku.com/gaming/ps3/academic-proves-ps3-is-a-supercomputer-243718.php/this shows how the ps3's power can be used while you'll be hard pressed to find any articles describing scientific applications of the xbox). Look at the tecnical aspect of games( native res. and how the engine works) and this will display the power diffrences between the two consoles.

Yeah like 15. Most of which are crap.

Are you forgetting that many reveiwers revere MLB 09:The Show as the pinnacle of sports games as well as the best baseball game ever created beside the real game.
Avatar image for da_iceman017
da_iceman017

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 da_iceman017
Member since 2008 • 120 Posts
[QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

[QUOTE="da_iceman017"]

Please stop comparing muti-plats because they are not accuraate in determining power. Rather look at the underlining hardware and look at the exclusive games technical aspects. These will display basically this: xbox 360 games: 720p 30fps/ ps3 games:mostly720p 30fps with a few 1080p 60fps. Slight edge? you decide.

Again, list those games

MLB 09: The Show, Wipeout HD, NBA 09: The Inside, Gran Turismo 5: Prolouge just to name a few.