@Lyon111: My favourite game for graphics on PC is still Bioshock Infinite , was playing it in 1440p 120hz with Ultra Low motion Blur (ULMB) mode on the monitor and it is just breathtakingly beautiful in motion. I doubt anyone will top this for art design.
It is that clear it literally looks like you can reach out and grab objects yourself.
@dani_i89: If this was PC then i could believe what you are saying but after witnessing first hand how atrocious the framerate is at times on the warthog and the same continuous bug in some parts of one of the levels with the sound whilst on the covenant ship, you must be dreaming. It is no different from console to console and it is a widely covered issue with the framerate so there is no use trying to defend a poorly developed program. It's still a fun game just needed better quality control and 1 year on it should have been fixed.
I am not knocking that it is still good value for money , especially to get it free with the console in any case. Just Halo deserved better treatment is all.
3 is being way too kind from what i have seen. It should have been zero. The real mystery is how they could mess it up this badly when they had such brilliant levels from previous games to use as a basis for comparison.
The game was made for the dual shock 3 at 30 fps so just changing the graphics and leaving the original physics in place as it was before was bound to cause control issues. All of the timings were set for the PS3 and i doubt they bothered mucking about with that part when they upped it to 60 fps.
@dino7c: it could only be 9 years and 11 months at the most . Wasn't it originally released in november 2005 in the USA? That's impressive though. I i kept the Halo one with the gold hard drive which i have as a display model with the master chief helmet and Warthog model with halo headset that was never opened.
Though i think i still have the Halo Reach and the red Resi evil one in storage somewhere.
Other than that i have the Starwars 360 which gets used occasionally.
Still have the original Xbox as well with a Conker Skin.
@shidib09: It was a fair enough question. I have an XboxOne and a 360 and i didn't get rid of anything for the 360 so i have no need to play 360 games on the new console is all.
I also have a 980ti system with a 144hz Gsync display so no i am not poor. I don't have a PS4 either though i may get one next year for uncharted series and Horizon which is looking good. I got an XboxOne for Halo , Quantum Break and Crackdown 2 for the most part. Though i did recently pick up Forza Horizon 2 which is pretty cool though gets a bit samey if you play for too long in one go.
I picked up the Rare games colleciton too which is excellent along with Forza 6 which i haven't had time to get far in yet but what i have played of it is very good. Not that worried about the graphics on the Xboxone as it doesn't seem anything amazing for the most part but it would be silly to think alot of these games will ever make it to PC which is why i decided to get one anyway.
However for the multi platform games i'll always choose PC. Arkham Knight at 90 fps in 1440p is absolutely amazing compared to the console versions. It may have taken a while to get fixed on PC but it was worth the wait. Like wise Farcry 4 , Assassins Creed games etc are just much better at faster FPS and better resolution.
The introduction of Gsync displays has made PC gaming exciting again. Especially 3D shooters.
DEVILTAZ35's comments