@ghostofgolden: I literally said "I never really played Titanfall". So how am I supposed to have the same level of reverence as you do?
I watched a buddy play the Titanfall 1 once, and all I remember was him thinking he was doing well against other players, when it was just bots he was killing. My old roommate played a fair amount of Titanfall 2 mp, but I didn't like what I saw. I played the beta and said "meh". And only one of my friends said the sp was great, but I didn't play it, so I can't confirm.
Your praise of the movement also falls on deaf ears, because I can't stand wall running. I think it feels cheap, and looks stupid. I also associate it with the future based CoD games, which I think are probably the worst. And of the couple times I tried Apex and Fortnite... get ready for it... I didn't like those either. I hate BR, along with the theme and attitude of those games. I don't like the scavenger nature of those games, I don't like the loot based 'trash to epic' rating for items, etc. I think they are both a plague on multiplayer, and would benefit the world if they never existed. But that's just me. And clearly most people don't feel the same.
The point of "That's at least something", was an attempt at positivity, in relation to my disdain for modern Star Wars. I'm not like most commenters in this thread that seem to hate Star Wars in general. I actually love it. What I hate is the poor use of the world. There are countless ways to make something cool out of Star Wars, but for whatever reason they can't seem to do it. I haven't played Survivor, but I didn't really care for Fallen Jedi, but maybe they fixed what I didn't like. Maybe I'll try it someday.
So when I see a new game, based on a franchise that has had a predictably mediocre output, paired with a game studio that has made nothing that I particularly care for, but still has a foundation of quality, I tried to give it the benefit of the doubt. Hope that makes sense.
Log in to comment