djshowstopper87's forum posts

Avatar image for djshowstopper87
djshowstopper87

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 djshowstopper87
Member since 2012 • 417 Posts

Okay I see how everyone is prasing Sony and the ps4, and I do agree the ps4 is sweet. But honestly, I currently have no interest in the ps4 as there is only one game for it that interests me Infamous Second Son.  I like Sony and all but I been burned by them too many times over the years, even more than MS. See I bought a ps3 in November 2006 for the riddiclous price point of 600 dollars. To later see that there aren't any games for the system for the first 2 YEARS of its life. My parents look at me ( I was 19 at the time) and say you pretty much wasted 600 bucks on a blu ray player, with no games and a crappy online service SMH.  So later I buy a psp for 150 bucks and once AGAIN, got burned with its lack of games, another face palm.

A few years ago I bought a vita becuase I believed in the Sony hype train again, and what happens? Sony burnes me YET AGAIN, with a another slightly more powerful psp with few games.  So yea, I was a hardcore Sony fan but after all that, I am not falling for Sony and its hype machine anymore. Until more games that interest me hit the ps4 like Uncharted 4, Last of Us 2, and Infamous Second Son come out, I am sticking with the Xbox One. Even though MS is no saint,  but they haven't burned me or cost me as much money as Sony. Anyone else got burned by Sony like I did? Are you still buying the ps4 at launch or are you waiting?

djshowstopper87

 

Added space so that it wasn't a wall of text. 

Avatar image for djshowstopper87
djshowstopper87

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 djshowstopper87
Member since 2012 • 417 Posts

Okay I see how everyone is prasing Sony and the ps4, and I do agree the ps4 is sweet. But honestly, I currently have no interest in the ps4 as there is only one game for it that interests me Infamous Second Son.  I like Sony and all but I been burned by them too many times over the years, even more than MS. See I bought a ps3 in November 2006 for the riddiclous price point of 600 dollars. To later see that there aren't any games for the system for the first 2 YEARS of its life. My parents look at me ( I was 19 at the time) and say you pretty much wasted 600 bucks on a blu ray player, with no games and a crappy online service SMH.  So later I buy a psp for 150 bucks and once AGAIN, got burned with its lack of games, another face palm. A few years ago I bought a vita becuase I believed in the Sony hype train again, and what happens? Sony burnes me YET AGAIN, with a another slightly more powerful psp with few games.  So yea, I was a hardcore Sony fan but after all that, I am not falling for Sony and its hype machine anymore. Until more games that interest me hit the ps4 like Uncharted 4, Last of Us 2, and Infamous Second Son come out, I am sticking with the Xbox One. Even though MS is no saint,  but they haven't burned me or cost me as much money as Sony. Anyone else got burned by Sony like I did? Are you still buying the ps4 at launch or are you waiting?

Avatar image for djshowstopper87
djshowstopper87

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 djshowstopper87
Member since 2012 • 417 Posts
Bump
Avatar image for djshowstopper87
djshowstopper87

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 djshowstopper87
Member since 2012 • 417 Posts
I am a black man living in the United States, of course I been racial profiled. Pulled over by cops for no reason other than they think I am a drug dealer or something. Followed around stores because they think I am gonna steal something, white women clutching their purses thinking I am trying to grab it and run etc. white people have no idea the BS blacks and other minorities have to deal with on a regular basis.
Avatar image for djshowstopper87
djshowstopper87

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 djshowstopper87
Member since 2012 • 417 Posts
So again, a African American woman fires a warning shot to stop her husband who was threatening her, killing no one she gets 20 years. Zimmerman ( a half white/ half Hispanic man) kills an un armed black teen whom HE FOLLOWED for no reason other than he looked like a criminal ( racial profiling) and walks away a free man. Anyone see the problem here? Florida is messed up and racist or America in general. And the whole self defense thing can work both ways. Trayvon was defending himself from a random stranger following him around a neighborhood. And like said before, the outcome of this case would have been entirely different if the races were switched. If Zimmerman was a black man and he shot a un armed white kid he would be in jail no doubts about it.
Avatar image for djshowstopper87
djshowstopper87

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 djshowstopper87
Member since 2012 • 417 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

This was the problem with her case..... An argument ensued, and Alexander said she feared for her life when she went out to her vehicle and retrieved the gun she legally owned. She came back inside and ended up firing a shot into the wall, which ricocheted into the ceiling.

BMD004

If that is the case, then she really didn't fear FOR HER LIFE.

 

She may have been afraid, but not to the extent that she would be killed.

Zimmerman didn't fear for his life. He followed a kid and got pissed that he was getting his ass kicked by said kid and shot him. I am gonna stand and fight if some creepy person is following me for no reason too. No matter how they twist this, Zimmerman is not as innocent as they are trying to portray him. Also he has shown ONE shed if remorse for killing Trayvon. That tells me all I need to know.
Avatar image for djshowstopper87
djshowstopper87

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 djshowstopper87
Member since 2012 • 417 Posts
Yea Zimmerman gets off by the stand your ground rule for killing an un armed teen but a lady that fires warning shots for someone threatening her. America or should I say Florida is messed up and completely racist.
Avatar image for djshowstopper87
djshowstopper87

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 djshowstopper87
Member since 2012 • 417 Posts
[QUOTE="djshowstopper87"][QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"] It was not in Trayvon's place to turn around and break someone's nose. Especially someone who he was "afraid of".EagleEyedOne
Again, if Zimmerman hadn't followed him and trying to play cop none if this would have happened. When he called the cops and gave them Trayvon's description and location that should have been the end if it. Grabbing a gun and following and questioning a guy and you are NOT a cop is a dumb idea and you just asking for trouble. Simply put, zimmerman was going for vigilante action and it back fired.

Zimmerman was acting lawfully. No matter how you try to put it.

That's crazy! So any old lune can grab a gun and follow and question anyone they perceive as suspicious in their neighborhood? I take jogs around my neighborhood and in another neighborhood ( sometimes in a hoodie if its chilly) and someone has the right to follow and question me when they clearly aren't a cop?
Avatar image for djshowstopper87
djshowstopper87

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 djshowstopper87
Member since 2012 • 417 Posts

[QUOTE="djshowstopper87"]Well in the case of Zimmerman maybe he should have warned Trayvon that he was armed. But I still say it was not his place to follow Trayvon, I don't care how you spin it. He was NOT a trained police officer, he simply should have called the police if he thought Trayvon was suspicious and be done with it. Following Trayvon and questioning him was a stupid idea and prompted the altercation. Therefore, I believe this case kind of supports vigilantes in my opinion. EagleEyedOne

It was not in Trayvon's place to turn around and break someone's nose. Especially someone who he was "afraid of".

Again, if Zimmerman hadn't followed him and trying to play cop none if this would have happened. When he called the cops and gave them Trayvon's description and location that should have been the end if it. Grabbing a gun and following and questioning a guy and you are NOT a cop is a dumb idea and you just asking for trouble. Simply put, zimmerman was going for vigilante action and it back fired.
Avatar image for djshowstopper87
djshowstopper87

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 djshowstopper87
Member since 2012 • 417 Posts
Well in the case of Zimmerman maybe he should have warned Trayvon that he was armed. But I still say it was not his place to follow Trayvon, I don't care how you spin it. He was NOT a trained police officer, he simply should have called the police if he thought Trayvon was suspicious and be done with it. Following Trayvon and questioning him was a stupid idea and prompted the altercation. Therefore, I believe this case kind of supports vigilantes in my opinion.