How are the maps and spawning? Does the game do a nice job of keeping the action tight?

I just ask because a lot of us that play CoD4 on PC are used to the bigger maps that can get quite boring if a lot of people leave.

the_mitch28

[QUOTE="dtrem1"]

This is how fast I can be in a lag free game. No searching etc. Not ALL bad. Just wish there were more players.. ah well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyhWPa17ZGY

simardbrad

took as long as when I could pick a server from a browser

This is how fast I can be in a lag free game. No searching etc. Not ALL bad. Just wish there were more players.. ah well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyhWPa17ZGY

I have it and like. Guess I am the minority. Wait a sec, there are thousands of people online playing... I wonder if THEY are giving low scores. Hmmmm, I bet not! I miss having 64 players and sometimes the matchmaking pauses when the host leaves but so far my games have been pretty damn smooth.

I also like not having to play with level 65 players on opening day and having to search for "lost" servers that I added to my favorites and I also like playing with people who actually paid for the game (like myself). I also like being able jump in and out of games when I get the time to sit down and play here and there. The graphics ARE better than CoD4, so I am not sure how people are saying they are not. And to say this is a cheap console port is totally wrong, play the last few Rainbox Sixes, THOSE are.

none:P My hdd is big enough to hold them easily, but i just stop playing them. i hate reinstallnig games, takes a while!Dr_Brocoli

Me..........Aion and Far Cry 2.

I could never get in to Far Cry 2, I tried and tried but not for me. Hard to explain it, really. I dumped Aion just because I dont have enough time to play all these games. (Between my PC and PS3) and it bored me a bit as well.

[QUOTE="dtrem1"]

Ya, let me know on the Dell. I am looking now at the S2409W.... hmmmm. I looked at the Asus in the store near me and they are nice but not sure they compare to the Dells that I have looked at.

lamx30108200

Overall, I'm very satisfied, as long as you sit in front of the monitor colors are great, no ghosting, no lag, no dead pixels, no bleeding nice and easy menu...the only thing is: I thought it would be bigger...viewing size is 12''(H) and 21''(W). I'm not sure but I think 24'' monitor using 1920X1200 are bigger than 24'' monitor using 1920X1080. So if I were you, I would keep your T240, or go with the asus VW266H (25'5 '' at 1920X1200)...Of course with dell, you get awesome quality monitors and superb costumer service. Knowing that the viewing size of the st2410 was that small, I would have probably waited a bit to get more cash and bought the U2410

I ended up getting the S2409W. I like it better than the T240. It is more "widescreen" than the T240. Its 1920 X 1080. The colours are pretty decent and works good with games.

Ya, let me know on the Dell. I am looking now at the S2409W.... hmmmm. I looked at the Asus in the store near me and they are nice but not sure they compare to the Dells that I have looked at.

I currently have a Samsung T240 24" and want to change monitors. The colours are way too drab.

Any suggestions to a good monitor in the under $300 range would be appreciated.