eyebrows' forum posts

Avatar image for eyebrows
eyebrows

686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 eyebrows
Member since 2003 • 686 Posts

[QUOTE="eyebrows"]Dude I know how it works...the point of the post was, MS and Sony have got greedy and more lazy than ever and the current state of BC shows that. I just wanted to know if we'd ever see it again...emulating really isn't hard, especially for multi-billion dollar corporations such as Sony and MS...they just don't want to as they want to milk every dime they can. Yes that's business but look at the Wii, they haven't taken the GC feature out when they know they could EASILY charge people $10 to even $25 for classic GC games such as Luigi's Mansion, Rogue Squadron 2, Pikmin, Mario Kart, Mario Sunshine, Smash Bros etc...they haven't because in that sense they know it would be beyond a joke. Now to count the different versions of the DS...SakusEnvoy

Well it's not like Nintendo even could, what with 512mb of internal storage. Nintendo kept BC because there was no compelling reason not to -- the Gamecube was already basically dead, internal storage wasn't large enough to allow downloadable GC games, and it uses the same hardware so they didn't have to do any work.

I mean, if anything, what Microsoft and Sony did was more impressive and certainly more costly. Sony took a big hit on initial PS3 production costs to include Emotion and the Graphics Synthesizer. Microsoft had to write an emulator from scratch and create a team to constantly improve the list of compatible games.

I agree with the first part, what I didn't like was that the consumer should always get more value for their money...I don't think there's a console in history that during its lifecycle has more features removed than the PS3 and I'm not just talking about BC.
Avatar image for eyebrows
eyebrows

686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 eyebrows
Member since 2003 • 686 Posts
I'm still bitter Sony took out BC...locopatho
Exactly, same here...it's the fact that if you look at the PS3 they actually had it in the sense of HARDWARE but greed got in the way and if you are to buy a slim from the store right now, you cannot play ONE ps2 game...ONE.
Avatar image for eyebrows
eyebrows

686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 eyebrows
Member since 2003 • 686 Posts

The 360 Slim isn't even Slim. It's just Smaller.

LegatoSkyheart
That's true and being honest, they haven't really reduced the size that much at all...like if you compare a PS2 fat to a PS2 slim then you can clearly see a difference but not as much with this new 360...
Avatar image for eyebrows
eyebrows

686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 eyebrows
Member since 2003 • 686 Posts

I don't see why people make a fuss over the physical appearance of a console. :? You didn't buy it to look at it.

Bigboi500
Some of us do, I'd rather have a PS3 60gb to go with my setup and look more sophisticated than a purple GC...
Avatar image for eyebrows
eyebrows

686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 eyebrows
Member since 2003 • 686 Posts
Dude I know how it works...the point of the post was, MS and Sony have got greedy and more lazy than ever and the current state of BC shows that. I just wanted to know if we'd ever see it again...emulating really isn't hard, especially for multi-billion dollar corporations such as Sony and MS...they just don't want to as they want to milk every dime they can. Yes that's business but look at the Wii, they haven't taken the GC feature out when they know they could EASILY charge people $10 to even $25 for classic GC games such as Luigi's Mansion, Rogue Squadron 2, Pikmin, Mario Kart, Mario Sunshine, Smash Bros etc...they haven't because in that sense they know it would be beyond a joke. Now to count the different versions of the DS...
Avatar image for eyebrows
eyebrows

686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 eyebrows
Member since 2003 • 686 Posts
For me personally the gamecube...I had a launch one from nearly 10 years ago and it STILL works flawlessly...but maybe that's just me, I don't know the failure rate of the GC but I presume it's not bad like the PS2, PS3, 360 etc...
Avatar image for eyebrows
eyebrows

686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 eyebrows
Member since 2003 • 686 Posts

PS3 and 360 = Very different from there predecessors.

Wii = 2 gamecubes duct taped together.

i joke

Vinegar_Strokes
lol, it's actually true though.
Avatar image for eyebrows
eyebrows

686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 eyebrows
Member since 2003 • 686 Posts
Both slim models look ugly IMO. I did buy a PS3 Slim, but it's the white and pink FFXIII Lightning edition that I got since I hated the matte black version.tekken220
I agree with the alternative PS3 slim that you got, it looks much better.
Avatar image for eyebrows
eyebrows

686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 eyebrows
Member since 2003 • 686 Posts
Will we ever see it? This list hasn't been updated for nearly 3 years: http://www.xbox.com/en-US/games/backwardcompatibilitygameslist.htm What is sad is that classic, awesome titles such as Timesplitters 2, Chronicles of Riddick etc are not on this list when they were actually caring about BC but...BARBIE HORSE ADVENTURE WAS? Then we have the PS3. I purposely bought a 60gb PS3 the second I heard about the 40gb coming out that was taking out PS2 playback, I just had this bad feeling they wouldn't put it back in out-of-the-box for someone like me with a big PS2 collection. Now I know the argument of "if you want to play older games get an older console" which is great although I must counter with "then don't tease US, the people that had the previous version of your system in the first place and had obviously loved playing those games, thought about making the upgrade as most thought it was a standard feature like the previous gen and then boom, take it out"... Look at the PS2. It was so easy trading in all your PS1 stuff but keeping your games since you know it would work on the next gen console, whether it was launch or even when it was in slim-form. PS3 the same...now look. It's quite sad that IMO, we the hardcore audience have been screwed and unless we had our old consoles...our old-skool game collections are worthless. The Wii can do it with the gamecube pretty much flawlessly...but not Sony and Microsoft? Absolute garbage. Rant over.